Trump has nothing g to apologize for. He said nothing wrong re Cheney. We’ve become a country of morons ready to feign and impute meaning that isn’t there then quickly faint
Trump suggests Cheney should be in front of a firing squad
- Thread starter Bowlmania
- Start date
There's a rant from alternate reality. In your first paragraph you claim Republicans are "warheads" (bullshit) and they've run to the Democratic Party. Very few have become Democrats. I'm sure you consider me one of them (actually anyone that isn't a Trump loyalist) and I'm still a Republican despite not liking a good large faction of the party right now. So, they're not in the Democratic Party and can in no way make "make puppets of the people in charge." I'm sorry but almost every word of that first paragraph is dumb.
One final thing as I get ready to golf, why do some of you doubt Harris' racial makeup? She's black and Indian. Period. Her father is from Jamaica and black. Take a look at his picture. Her mother is Indian. There is no doubt of her makeup. Why is this a thing for some of you?
Some on this board need a lobotomy. He never said or implied any such thing. What he said is that Lyin' Liz is a war whore who will gladly vote to send your sons and daughters to go to the front lines to fight a pointless war while she herself would never go near a war in a million years.
Trump is using the "Chickenhawk" argument that we heard so frequently from 2002-2008 from Democrat's about the Iraq War.
It's as old an argument as time itself.
@aloha
What’s funny about what I wrote? Did you not hear him? It’s the same thing Dems have said forever. Bush cheney etc are quick to send kids to war. They aren’t the ones going.
Exactly. Ridiculous. Dems have said it themselves for decades
Bloodbath 2.0. The OP isn’t the brightest bulb out there
Let me start by saying I can't stomach Trump, but I agree with McM.
I believe that those executive and legislative branch war supporters, under the age of 45, should be in the first wave of COMBAT troops. Second wave would be composed of their children.
You're defending the indefensible. It's a huge, gigantic stretch, to say Liz Cheaney has sent kids to war. She's never been in a position to do it and to the best of my knowledge there hasn't even been a vote during her tenure to do anything of the kind. I heard exactly what he said in total. Everything immediately before and immediately after. There is no defense for it, but you're trying. I have a good friend who was a JAG officer (now civilian lawyer), and he once told me that there was almost no defense he wouldn't try for his clients (paraphrasing) because sometimes they fly. Good luck with yours. Your defense reminded me of my buddy and what he said so I laughed.
That’s all trump clearly meant. It’s been the cry of Dems for years against bush bush 2 Cheney McCain and the rest. And it’s also the rebuke of rfk jr against the Dems ostensibly sidling up with Cheney and the war machine politicians. Hypocrites
This is why you should never compare your intellect to mine. It’s also why you found the right profession. You’re too literal. Unable to discern context etc. To think critically. What he said/implied was patent and your interpretation of same is way off
That's the worst defense of them all, but exactly what I'd expect from you.
He’s correct. You can disagree with the interpretation but if you disagree with his belief as to her and their intent you’re wrong. He doesn’t want to shoot Cheney. I can’t believe I have to write this
Bush lied children died!!!
Same playbook every time. Hilarious to watch the left that for years called Bush and Cheney mass murderers now defending them.
You can't believe you have to explain what Trump was saying?
Have you not been paying attention? He has people explaining what he meant a lot (I read between the lines, but he is one of the worst communicators that I can remember with his messages).
Who the hell said he wanted to shoot her? He's using violent language that should never be used by any Presidential candidate. No Presidential candidate except Trump would be defended for it, but here you are. There are elected Republicans and people in his campaign doing their best to try to spin this into something less irresponsible and reprehensible. They're going to have a very tough time doing that. One thing you're right about is that Trump should be hidden away and stay off Twitter and Truth from now until the election. He doesn't help himself by saying so many extremely stupid things and he doesn't have the ability not to do it.
I defended them then and I'll defend them now. You're the so-called Republican who joined the left to attack them.
That’s not what he said at all. Another hoax.
Every single day lately Trump has given his team something they have to try furiously to defend. This one is a tough one since it actually is indefensible without being master contortionists.
He said exactly what I think he said. I listened to it probably five times while listening to POTUS this morning. There is no doubt and no reasonable defense, which of course, is why his team is very busy trying hard to spin it.
Lots of dumb people in the media too. All they do is lie. Will be blood on their hands when the rioting starts early Wednesday. Because Trump is Hitler obviously and will put people in camps and make himself King for life.
No candidate for president of the United States should be depicting a political opponent in front of a firing squad. Full stop. Intent, context, nuance, etc., do not negate this. What Trump said is reckless and irresponsible, and entirely consistent with his long history of violent rhetoric.
No. It was very clear. Nor a first impression argument. This is incredibly dumb. Our country is annoying
Since when is a person to be executed given a gun? Trump was saying Liz should fight in the wars she championed.
It’s an argument that’s been around for decades. Farhenheit 911. Of course no member of congress would want to send their kids. Michael Moore etc.
Emotions are guiding you. TDS. I’m fine if he or Harris said it. But I can think
Now defend this.
Ready . . . GO!!
Gen. Mark Milley Says He Has Taken 'Measures' to Protect Family After Trump Suggests He Should be Executed
Trump, who is running in the 2024 presidential race, claimed Milley would have faced death "in times gone by" for communicating with a Chinese general during the former president's tenure.
No candidate for president of the United States should be depicting a political opponent in front of a firing squad. Full stop. Intent, context, nuance, etc., do not negate this. What Trump said is reckless and irresponsible, and entirely consistent with his long history of violent rhetoric.
I can’t defend anything Milley says or does. He was part of the Bible March fiasco and a vital part of the Afghanastan fiasco. The guy is a moron—A spineless one at that.
Biden said Trump should be in the bulls-eye and should be locked up.
This whole topic is nothing but fake outrage, which is very typical of the wuss centric Democrat party.
Ha ha. No, defend what Trump said that caused Milley to fear for his family's safety.
Wasn't the defense for a majority of the Jan 6th defendents that they were basically brainwashed and led to believe the big lie? Very dangerous rhetoric coming from the leader of a group, where roughly 60% of members still believe the big lie. Low info, high hate.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Trump suggests Cheney should be in front of a firing squad
- Latest: ChicagoFineForNow
-