And I will reiterate the fact that every article I read and person I heard, rated Archie as the top hire in college basketball. That isn't just a fluke. RMK didn't endorse him for kicks. He was HIGHLY thought of as a coach and most speculate that if IU wouldn't have hired him he would now be at OSU. All of that said, Archie might not be the guy but the next one or two years will tell the tale.
If he doesn't work out, that IMO, doesn't make it a bad hire by Glass. If you have every hired people, did everyone of them excel? I know I can't make that claim.
Let's tease your logic out. You're essentially saying as long as some national media/twitter people say it's a great hire, then the A.D. is off the hook for the results of the coach. Theoretically, Glass, could continue to be the A.D. after 15 bad hires because the national media said they were great hires. You can't see why someone would question that logic?
I base my opinion on actual results. If Allen and Archie work out, Glass, should be given credit, a raise, and etc.. If they both don't work out, he should be fired.
Never met the man. My opinion is just as valid as yours.
IMO, he hired one of if not the best candidate available. Archie has everything in facilities and support that he needs to be successful. What more can Glass do?
Have you ever hired employees?
What Glass needs to do is hire a coach that turns IU into an elite program again. It's his most important job requirement.
Not to be rude, but you comparing your hiring of entry level employees to Fred Glass's job, is apples to oranges. I will say, if I was your boss and you continued to hire employees that weren't any good at the job, I would stop allowing you to make those decisions.
Last edited: