Purdue get Proctor, Archie gets ?
- Thread starter Tegray1
- Start date
This s**tshow is just getting started. Next season will be ugly.
Why don't you add something to the conversation besides weak ass negative BS?
Why don't you answer the questions Taz asked?
Oh wait, that is because you can't.
to be a shooter you actually have to, you know, shoot the ball. if you don't even make one three pointer per game how in the hell are a shooter? you keep hanging on 40% like that's all that matters. if you took 5 shots all season and made 2 are you a prolific shooter?
what i can see is a player with terrible form, even worse footwork, and a couple of years of college play against a talent level far below the big ten and a proven inability to score from three. perhaps you could write a letter to the st. mary's coach and ask him to please tell you he isn't a coach.
And let’s say Archie did blow that evaluation.
THAT is what caused us to miss the NCAA tournament? Those 90 player games missed to injury had no impact, right?
I think you have it backwards: this board's become a circus and then the clown showed himself.
Yeah but not because he couldn’t shoot. Don’t bring up bullshit about not starting. He didn’t start because he’s not a post player and not because he couldn’t shoot.
You still here asshole. You’re the only clown I see but you’re not in charge of jack shit.
That is stupid, pretty much all grad transfers are 1 and done. I would rather him concentrate on recruiting real talent and real players unlike Fitzner and his lifetime 4-10 3 pt clip in NCAAW league land
There is a risk to grad transfers if they negatively affect team chemistry. You have to get the right guy that fits in with your team.
This is very true. No way an IU coach can take 14 years to finally make it past the sweet 16. A lot of people here think Archie should’ve done it in year two!Painter would have been ran out of town on a rail at IU, and justifiably so. They just finished their statue of Painter to place outside of Mackey:
When will the state of Indiana, as it relates to college basketball, maintain the consistency of states like North Carolina and Michigan in their success on the hardwood?
Every year, Duke and UNC are good and have legitimate shots to go deep in the tourney?
Michigan State and Michigan have become a situation like that.
Meanwhile, states like Indiana this year had 3 teams not worth a damn and 1 that was pretty good. And it ebbs and flows every year. One year, it may be IU or Butler or Purdue or ND but never all of them playing at consistently high levels in the same season.
They call this a “basketball state?”
I guess that just means that the state really likes basketball without the results?
Hell, the best kid in the state this recruiting class, Brooks, decided to pack his shit and head out of state.
So much for being a state that has college programs appealing enough to lock them in to a state school.
I could make an argument that the state of Alabama is as much a basketball state as Indiana at this point.
The apologists won’t like this truth.
Here come the personal attacks and insults with a side of false guarantees.
Really? Is it that hard to understand why UNC/Duke and MSU/UM have built programs that compete in the tourney every year? The state of North Carolina has had successful coaches stick around 2 and 3 or more decades (Dean Smith and Roy Williams @ UNC and Coach K @ Duke). The state of Michigan did with MSU from Jud to Izzo and UM has had lesser success through the years but still was best when they held on to coaches for a long time (Orr, Freider, Fisher and now Beilein all got 10 or more seasons). The state of Indiana had it for nearly 3 decades with Knight-Keady-Phelps @ IU-PU-ND,
Currently in Indiana and Carolina and Michigan, the teams with the most continuity in coaching staffs have built programs that continually compete, and even the past 2 decades in Indiana with ND and Purdue. Brey didn't miss the postseason in nearly 20 years until they joined the ACC, and have missed 2 of 6. Purdue transitioned from Keady to Painter and have been the most consistent of the bunch. Butler has been great and bad, up and down. the past 2-3 decades as every time they have a good coach, he gets poached by a higher profile program (7 coaches in 20 years). And IU has had 5 coaches in 20 years (6 if you count Dakich), and had fired every one of them except the current one and some people want him fired too (something that can't be said about ANY of the teams you listed).
It's hard to build a dynastic program when you are changing coaches like dirty underwear.
Currently in Indiana and Carolina and Michigan, the teams with the most continuity in coaching staffs have built programs that continually compete, and even the past 2 decades in Indiana with ND and Purdue. Brey didn't miss the postseason in nearly 20 years until they joined the ACC, and have missed 2 of 6. Purdue transitioned from Keady to Painter and have been the most consistent of the bunch. Butler has been great and bad, up and down. the past 2-3 decades as every time they have a good coach, he gets poached by a higher profile program (7 coaches in 20 years). And IU has had 5 coaches in 20 years (6 if you count Dakich), and had fired every one of them except the current one and some people want him fired too (something that can't be said about ANY of the teams you listed).
It's hard to build a dynastic program when you are changing coaches like dirty underwear.
Last edited:
Best kid in the state based on what? I thought TJD was the highest ranked?
Or when you hire terrible coaches and then hang on to them way too long.
Tom Crean was here 9 years. That’s an eternity in college sports. He should have been fired after 3. Hanging on to a bad coach for 30 years will just get you 30 bad seasons.
Year 3 of Archie is the most important one of his life. If no NCAA, his seat will get very hot. That's a fact.
I definitely think this true. IMO, he will get year four unless there is rules issues or another epic collapse.
3 years of no NCAA and you think he gets year 4? I really don't understand this thought .
The subject line of this thread sounds like the start of a very bad riddle:
“Purdue get Proctor, Archie gets?”
Answer: A “proctologist?”
“Purdue get Proctor, Archie gets?”
Answer: A “proctologist?”
Here's the long discussion on it. Roster Construction 2019 - 2021
The pertinent portion to answer your question on the injuries is this:
Please answer the bold. Been asking this same question for A MONTH now and all the people who tell me "every team has to deal with injuries" has never been able to give me an answer. Would be much obliged if you could provide who this team is.
Can you possibly answer why anyone would think the 2018-2019 team would win the conference and get to the final four as long as they had “solid” point guard play, then come on here for 8 pages and argue that the talent and experience level of the team weren’t comparable to MSU, the team that accomplished those things? Face it, you were wrong. Very, very wrong. You’re trying to have it both ways and it’s impossible. Just own that you didn’t know what you were talking about and then shut up. Please.
Sure, ordfan - that was the possibilities BEFORE the season.
BEFORE all the injuries.
Any other questions?
One more: Why do you post here when you don’t have the slightest idea what you’re talking about? A team lacking in talent and experience, by your estimate, was still a legitimate conference champion and final four contender? No one could be as stupid as you. Please stfu. Please. You were wrong. Way wrong. Just own it.
Damn man, I was agreeing with you or so I thought.
You stated that no NCAA next year and his seat gets very hot. You did NOT say he would be fired. I took it to mean that his seat would be very hot in year four.
So are you saying that no NCAA in year three and he gets fired?
One more: Why do you post here under the 346th username, Ordfan? Why don’t you own that?
If painter had all the talent we’ve had the last 15 years he’d have 3-4 final fours by now Jimbo.
Similar threads
