ADVERTISEMENT

Purdue get Proctor, Archie gets ?

Never posted that...ever...ever
Link?

Still waiting
You called Cline a drug addict and implied that it was the fault of his parents, Love4beer. Not surprised you keep lying about it, since you keep lying about your Love4beer identity, too, until today. Still remember your not very heartfelt “glad he straightened his life out” garbage.

Love4beer Sucks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Courtsensethree
The clown is you. You are the same pos who ran Crean out of town. Their is a reason you can’t say a bad word about PUke. 3 years ago you idiot never won shit Purdue fans wanted Painter ran out of town. Did you quit paying premium to spew your garbage?
Ran Crean out of town? Me? Not his 9 years of never making it past the Sweet 16? Not his 5 years of missing the Tournament in 9 years? I did that?
 
Learn the definition of irony.

Bottom line - I'm done arguing with a PUke on an IU board when the PUke doesn't like how the IU fan is posting. Either deal with it and stop crying, or go away.
Lol now I'm crying? Ive said multiple times idc what you do on here. I just pointed out the fact that you give no opinions on things and solely post here to argue with others even in your own fanbase. Looks like your feelings are hurt though since I'm being told to go away.
 
Yea they had a great tournament and I won't deny that. However, Oklahoma and Maryland came in the final four though and I'm talking about the path to get there since that's what I responded to. Now I was only a kid when this was going on so I don't know but I'm willing to guess that not many people thought Indiana was going to come out of that region.

Indiana was a 4 or 5 seed I don't remember which and got the 12 and 13 seeds to reach the sweet 16. Then they got the huge upset win over Duke and got 10 seed Kent St in the elite 8. Not the most difficult path but none of that matters in the record books though because it still goes down as a final 4. That's my point when I say you need things to break your way from time to time.
judging a path to the championship based on seed numbers is exceedingly foolish
 
judging a path to the championship based on seed numbers is exceedingly foolish
If I'm a 5 seed and I'm told I have two paths I can take to try to get to the final four

Path 1 - 12 seed, 4 seed, 1 seed, 2 seed

Path 2 - 12 seed, 13 seed, 1 seed, 10 seed

Wouldn't I be an idiot if I don't take path 2? It's foolish to think that?
 
all-aboard-the-5cca0d.jpg

You confuse excuses with simple analysis. A significant injury at the wrong time can hurt your chances of advancing. Are you going to claim that Scott may's injury did not hurt IU's chances of advancing? I certainly think that it did.

You also fail to acknowledge the direct contradictions in your posts. I guess you just think failure to recognize will make it go away; my child when three years old used to think that if she covered her eyes whatever she saw would disappear as well. Unfortunately for you, that only works in the minds of very small children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emartin70287
Yea they had a great tournament and I won't deny that. However, Oklahoma and Maryland came in the final four though and I'm talking about the path to get there since that's what I responded to. Now I was only a kid when this was going on so I don't know but I'm willing to guess that not many people thought Indiana was going to come out of that region.

Indiana was a 4 or 5 seed I don't remember which and got the 12 and 13 seeds to reach the sweet 16. Then they got the huge upset win over Duke and got 10 seed Kent St in the elite 8. Not the most difficult path but none of that matters in the record books though because it still goes down as a final 4. That's my point when I say you need things to break your way from time to time.
And there lies the difference in the two schools. When IU talks about their path, it is a path to the national title. When Purdue (you) talks about the path, it is to the F4. You just said it yourself.
 
And there lies the difference in the two schools. When IU talks about their path, it is a path to the national title. When Purdue (you) talks about the path, it is to the F4. You just said it yourself.
Or maybe I was talking about the final 4 since the post I responded to originally was about the final 4. Even says that in the post you chose to respond to.
 
If I'm a 5 seed and I'm told I have two paths I can take to try to get to the final four

Path 1 - 12 seed, 4 seed, 1 seed, 2 seed

Path 2 - 12 seed, 13 seed, 1 seed, 10 seed

Wouldn't I be an idiot if I don't take path 2? It's foolish to think that?
the tournament is rife with "upsets" and hot teams. there are frequent surprise teams that make it to the final 4 or even the championship game each year. the point being, small conference schools can never be a high seed but sometimes have a great team as we have all seen.
 
the tournament is rife with "upsets" and hot teams. there are frequent surprise teams that make it to the final 4 or even the championship game each year. the point being, small conference schools can never be a high seed but sometimes have a great team as we have all seen.
Well it looks like you answered jimbo's question from the other day but I'd still choose to play the small schools over the big schools seeded better every single time. That's why you try to have the best possible regular season to get seeded as high as possible.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT