ADVERTISEMENT

On Traditional Media and Why it Sucks

I guess now I'm confused about "something to aspire to". I would suspect that the teacher in question would reject that because it then also offers up an alternative of straightness as "something to aspire to" when what I get from her is that people should be accepted for and accept themselves for what they are. Is that a "something to aspire to" that you have a problem with?
You’re overthinking it. Kids have role models. Their teacher is a role model - especially at that age. It’s not hard to quickly get to “my teacher tells us she is LGBTQ, and I want to be just like her!” Would the teacher explain to these 4 yr olds that this isn’t the right approach? Who knows. Who knows if the kids would say anything to their teacher - but the seed has been planted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
I don’t think that’s the case. There has been a sea change brought about in this country over the past couple decades where we’ve gotten really tolerant of others that don’t fit the “traditional mold.” That’s a good thing.

However, I also think we’ve grown too tolerant of overt mental illness while we attempt to make up for the sins of past intolerances. We’ve given too much power to activists that clearly cross lines and have empowered them to say and do unacceptable things without the necessary repercussions. Criticizing their actions yields claims of bigotry or intolerance or that we just “don’t get it.” It gets to the heart of being unserious and in our haste to make up for past sins, we are destroying our future.
The problem with folks like Crazy is they seem to lament your first paragraph because they believe it caused the second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Think only b/c at a preschool level they have no idea what gay, straight, queer even means.

Sexuality isn't aspirational but her message should have, at a minimum, been balanced by saying "being straight is totally cool too" and when you think that in your head to get to realizing how discussing sexuality at all with preschoolers is kinda dumb.
Totally. That's why I asked about the specifics of what she is doing in the classroom that sets people off. Ranger made some assumptions that I don't think are necessarily on point, so I wondered where the trigger point lies (I think it was you talking about a teaching saying that they had a nice weekend getaway with their vs. talking about hooking up all weekend long.) It's been interesting to me to watch how some people (not the people we're conversing with here) don't blink when a female teacher talks about her husband, but are horrified when she talks about her girlfriend.
 
You’re overthinking it. Kids have role models. Their teacher is a role model - especially at that age. It’s not hard to quickly get to “my teacher tells us she is LGBTQ, and I want to be just like her!” Would the teacher explain to these 4 yr olds that this isn’t the right approach? Who knows. Who knows if the kids would say anything to their teacher - but the seed has been planted.
Did they do that when they found out their teacher was straight?
 
Totally. That's why I asked about the specifics of what she is doing in the classroom that sets people off. Ranger made some assumptions that I don't think are necessarily on point, so I wondered where the trigger point lies (I think it was you talking about a teaching saying that they had a nice weekend getaway with their vs. talking about hooking up all weekend long.) It's been interesting to me to watch how some people (not the people we're conversing with here) don't blink when a female teacher talks about her husband, but are horrified when she talks about her girlfriend.
Yeah, I'm trying to tiptoe around what people's motivations or intentions for being upset might be. I can understand why someone might be upset with the vid of the teacher. It might be inappropriate as a discussion to have with a 5 year old who probably just wants to be on the swings outside. It's probably a better conversation another 5 years or so down the road.

What I can't get on board with is someone believing her intention was to advocate for a lifestyle. Perhaps some see normalization of queer as a problem. Not saying that's IUCrazy's belief of course as he's been pretty adamant he doesn't give a damn about someone's lifestyle, pedos excluded obviously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosboot
Preschool teachers are an odd bunch to begin with, but "grooming" is a pretty loaded word and I think most people who use it understand the implication that you noted.

I didn't have any problem with the intentions that she stated in that video - setting the table for kids who turn out to be straight to respect and accept kids who turn out to be queer and for kids who turn out to be queer to love and accept themselves. One might quibble with how she gets there, but I don't see that information or that quibble here. So, "grooming" feels like a major and troubling inaccuracy.
I don’t know, teaching children to be accepting and respectful of others, and accepting of themselves, sounds pretty woke to me. It’s horrifying that our nation has come to this.

I’m not down with that woke shit. Keep that woke shit away from me.

No more woke! No more woke! No more woke!
 
And now this...Jezuz.

Did this guy show up?

jacob-chansley-01-gty-jc-210115_1610727185111_hpMain_16x9_1600.jpg
 
You show me a thread that gets over 100 posts that doesn't.

It's how the world works.
That being said...
I gotta admit that I do appreciate @IUCrazy2 . I don't agree with much of what he says (almost typed "alot", but remembered my AlohaHoosier lessons), and he is a tad bit overreactive, but he presents his argument with passion, honesty, and a refreshing lack of smarm...unlike some of his gasbag, condescending, patronizing brethren, who try to act like the the most clever guy in the room. Or cray. :D
 
That being said...
I gotta admit that I do appreciate @IUCrazy2 . I don't agree with much of what he says (almost typed "alot", but remembered my AlohaHoosier lessons), and he is a tad bit overreactive, but he presents his argument with passion, honesty, and a refreshing lack of smarm...unlike some of his gasbag, condescending, patronizing brethren, who try to act like the the most clever guy in the room. Or cray. :D
Agreed. Far more interesting to have an actual discussion as opposed to many others.
 
realizing how discussing sexuality at all with preschoolers is kinda dumb.
Now we are getting closer to the same page. Even if we disagree about some of the other stuff, this basically gets to the heart of everything. These discussions with very young children are dumb. That is exactly what the Florida bill covered and it got labeled "don't say gay", Disney got involved as the Corporate protector of the LGBTQ community and is about to get their nose bloodied, and all this because of wanting to do what you (rightly) indicate is dumb.
 
That being said...
I gotta admit that I do appreciate @IUCrazy2 . I don't agree with much of what he says (almost typed "alot", but remembered my AlohaHoosier lessons), and he is a tad bit overreactive, but he presents his argument with passion, honesty, and a refreshing lack of smarm...unlike some of his gasbag, condescending, patronizing brethren, who try to act like the the most clever guy in the room. Or cray. :D
I am a total asshole though. ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bulk VanderHuge
Yeah, I'm obviously wrong here. And I also have kids in school. One of which is 4 and will be going into preschool in the fall.
Take this for what it is worth, be involved and vigilant about what they are teaching your child. You have every right and it is your job to make sure that your values are being respected in school as well.

It is not an easy job that teachers have and even when I have disagreed with our children's teachers, every conversation has always been respectful. That being said, we have to advocate for our kids as parents. This is probably the one topic that fires me up more than anything. It sucks to have your trust broken in institutions where you almost have to send your kids for 1/3 of the day, 5 days a week, for 13 years. You have to have a trust relationship with teachers, it stinks when you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spartans9312
Yeah, I mean who can’t get behind: “Don’t tax Disney! Don’t tax Disney!”?
Is it all about Disney or is some of it the redistricting map? DeSantis went all New York and really smashed the Democrats with the Congressional redistricting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spartans9312
Thought about it. Too broad. Too easily applied to all things. Not narrow enough to mean a person in power coercing their charge - who has to be there by statutory law.
I don't like the practice you are describing in the least, although I do at the end of the day agree with the woman in that TikTok video that I think it would be great for kids to be normalized as to the fact that gay people are perfectly fine and just as morally upstanding as straight people. Cool. But when she starts talking about training "allies" she crosses a line because that is a very specialized term in the social justice community and it carries a lot of baggage.

That said, using the term grooming here is wrong, in my mind. Grooming has a sexual connotation now:
(Oxford Dictionary)
the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense.
"online grooming has become a growing cause for concern"

And that's obviously why the word is being used. Of course, the Left misuses words like racism and fascism all the time with similar intentions. That's not good either.

Again, I'll fall back on Orwell who was so prescient:

 
I don't like the practice you are describing in the least, although I do at the end of the day agree with the woman in that TikTok video that I think it would be great for kids to be normalized as to the fact that gay people are perfectly fine and just as morally upstanding as straight people. Cool. But when she starts talking about training "allies" she crosses a line because that is a very specialized term in the social justice community and it carries a lot of baggage.

That said, using the term grooming here is wrong, in my mind. Grooming has a sexual connotation now:
(Oxford Dictionary)
the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense.
"online grooming has become a growing cause for concern"

And that's obviously why the word is being used. Of course, the Left misuses words like racism and fascism all the time with similar intentions. That's not good either.

Again, I'll fall back on Orwell who was so prescient:

is your issue with allies age-related in this example? Or the word in general?
 
They don’t understand straight vs gay vs XYZ. That’s the point. They don’t think in those terms.
I'm not so sure about that. When I was five, for a brief time during the summer, my best friend was a girl who lived a few houses down. Neither one of us understood when our parents tried to explain to us why a sleepover was inappropriate. Other than vaguely understanding that boys and girls were somehow two different things, we didn't understand what those differences actually were. But, by the time my second grade teacher was getting married, I completely understood that she was a she, and she was marrying a he, and this was completely normal, because boys became men, girls became women, and women married men and started families. I might not have appreciated the clinical realities of sex at the time, but I certainly had the basics of gender and sexuality down pat.
 
Totally. That's why I asked about the specifics of what she is doing in the classroom that sets people off. Ranger made some assumptions that I don't think are necessarily on point, so I wondered where the trigger point lies (I think it was you talking about a teaching saying that they had a nice weekend getaway with their vs. talking about hooking up all weekend long.) It's been interesting to me to watch how some people (not the people we're conversing with here) don't blink when a female teacher talks about her husband, but are horrified when she talks about her girlfriend.
One false assumption you’re teasing out of Ranger lies in this text:


“my teacher tells us she is LGBTQ, and I want to be just like her!”
.... Who knows if the kids would say anything to their teacher - but the seed has been planted.
Ranger and others wittingly or unwittingly see LGBTQ as a choice, thus “a seed can be planted” “to want to be like her” and later choose to be so.

Societally we have two basic issues people mix up related to sex and kids. 1) Biological reproduction is conflated with sexual feelings. 2) Bullying is conflated intolerance of non-traditional sexual identity.

Young kids know that babies come from somewhere and are curious about that long before teenagers start feeling sexual passion.

Bullying occurs at very early ages for all kinds of reasons.

These conflations lead to stupid politics and stupid discussions. The solution for teachers is to talk about bullying and, for example, telling young kids that daddy kisses mommy in a special way to make a baby. That’s the simplicity of the intelligent but boring discussion.
 
They don’t understand straight vs gay vs XYZ. That’s the point. They don’t think in those terms.
I get that, but I'm asking about the application of that which you object to. You assumed what the preschool teacher was talking about, but nobody provided examples of actual behavior that they objected to. I think it was Lars who did a pretty good job of fleshing out some of that and I think that's where some of the disconnects stem from.

You seem to have a concern about preschool kids aspiring to be like their LGBTQ teachers. So, all my kids' preschool teachers talked about their significant others. Sometimes those significant others visited the classroom. One was a fireman. Another was a construction foreman. Another was a nurse. Two of those were straight opposite-gender relationships and one was a same-sex relationship. Is that okay? Or should it be verboten?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin the Martian
I get that, but I'm asking about the application of that which you object to. You assumed what the preschool teacher was talking about, but nobody provided examples of actual behavior that they objected to. I think it was Lars who did a pretty good job of fleshing out some of that and I think that's where some of the disconnects stem from.

You seem to have a concern about preschool kids aspiring to be like their LGBTQ teachers. So, all my kids' preschool teachers talked about their significant others. Sometimes those significant others visited the classroom. One was a fireman. Another was a construction foreman. Another was a nurse. Two of those were straight opposite-gender relationships and one was a same-sex relationship. Is that okay? Or should it be verboten?
I have no problem with young children aspiring to be like their teachers, LGBTQ or not, but I do have a problem with them ascribing to be like them because of their LGBTQ-ness.

I expect teachers to say “Hi, I’m so and so and I’ll be teaching you this year.” I don’t expect “Hi I’m so and so, my pronouns are this and that and I’ll be teaching you this year.” And then proceeding to teach about LGBTQ issues and acceptance and being good Allies.

No, I don’t have a problem with a teacher’s significant others showing up in the classroom provided they’ve passed the requisite clearance process.
 
I don't like the practice you are describing in the least, although I do at the end of the day agree with the woman in that TikTok video that I think it would be great for kids to be normalized as to the fact that gay people are perfectly fine and just as morally upstanding as straight people. Cool. But when she starts talking about training "allies" she crosses a line because that is a very specialized term in the social justice community and it carries a lot of baggage.

That said, using the term grooming here is wrong, in my mind. Grooming has a sexual connotation now:
(Oxford Dictionary)
the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense.
"online grooming has become a growing cause for concern"

And that's obviously why the word is being used. Of course, the Left misuses words like racism and fascism all the time with similar intentions. That's not good either.

Again, I'll fall back on Orwell who was so prescient:

Grooming has many uses, including grooming someone at work to be a future leader or an apprentice to be a tradesman. Defenders of activists are choosing to make it a pedo-accusation. That’s not how I think most use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
is your issue with allies age-related in this example? Or the word in general?
It's the term--for those in the social justice community, an ally is someone who actively fights for a political objective or ideology. In short, they are activists. I don't think public schools should be training grounds for people fighting for any political positions.


I think of this as a growing problem in public education in large suburban or urban settings. Some states have even changed or are considering changing their social studies objectives to include "activism." I think it is a terrible idea and hurts political minorities in local areas. Illinois at one point proposed to enshrine teaching progressive ideology and creating progressive activists as a goal in teacher training:


I think that is just as wrong and misguided as if Mississippi tried to legally enact teacher training to pump out anti-abortion activists. Public schools should be left out of these culture wars instead of being made the front lines of those wars. And starting them at young ages is really beyond the pale, in my mind.
 
Grooming has many uses, including grooming someone at work to be a future leader or an apprentice to be a tradesman. Defenders of activists are choosing to make it a pedo-accusation. That’s not how I think most use it.
I think you're being naive. Libs of Tik Tok used the term when posting a video about pedophilia made by someone with a trans identity, in the political context of a movement that goes out of its way to describe the opposing side as a secret cabal of child sex traffickers. The term "grooming" can be used in multiple ways, but there's only one way it's being used here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU
I think you're being naive. Libs of Tik Tok used the term when posting a video about pedophilia made by someone with a trans identity, in the political context of a movement that goes out of its way to describe the opposing side as a secret cabal of child sex traffickers. The term "grooming" can be used in multiple ways, but there's only one way it's being used here.
Yes, one of the more insidious issues in this: gays (mostly gay men) have been fighting the stereotype that they are all child molesters and pedophiles for a very, very long time.

From what I have read, though, LGBTQ+ advocacy has moved beyond what many gay men care about or identify with. Ironic that they might shoulder the brunt of this, then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bub-rub
Yes, one of the more insidious issues in this: gays (mostly gay men) have been fighting the stereotype that they are all child molesters and pedophiles for a very, very long time.

From what I have read, though, LGBTQ+ advocacy has moved beyond what many gay men care about or identify with. Ironic that they might shoulder the brunt of this, then.
See even in the LGBTQ world Gen Z is better than Millenials and Zoomers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_6hv78pr714xta
Allies is a social justice warrior word that is basically “if you don’t agree with everything we see - you’re against us.”

my opinion isn’t fully formed on this issue but could a catholic or otherwise conservative Christian school be viewed as creating allies for the heterosexual, abstinence-til-marriage crowd and all the political leanings that entails? Granted, the parents are making the choice to send them but it’s still indoctrination

as a pragmatist, I’d rather send my kids to a school full of LGBTQ teachers than most other cults
 

"Western societies are in the midst of a growing 'culture war' between cultural socialism and cultural liberalism"... this has led Republican voters to mistrust K-12 educators, social science professors and the media because they're cultural socialists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Yes, one of the more insidious issues in this: gays (mostly gay men) have been fighting the stereotype that they are all child molesters and pedophiles for a very, very long time.

From what I have read, though, LGBTQ+ advocacy has moved beyond what many gay men care about or identify with. Ironic that they might shoulder the brunt of this, then.

ive worked with hay folks who were caught between being left of straight but right of LGBTQ. Would be an opportunity for a wing of a political party if we weren’t allowed but the two lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT