I’m interested in your thoughts on this, Zeke.
Using the generic definition of groom, prepare or train (someone) for a particular purpose or activity, much of our traditional culture “grooms” people to be heterosexual, among other things, in the classroom and out. Biological reproduction necessitates this to a degree.
The LGBTQ community has a legitimate concern about this and a legitimate desire to “groom“ K-3 pupils to be tolerant and accepting of differences and to not bully others (without necessarily discussing issues related to sexual attraction).
How to resolve this dilemma?
For example, suppose a queer, physically female, K-3 teacher is noticeably pregnant. Her pupils are naturally curious. One pupil asks her how babies happen. What is her answer?
I chose this example because it clearly separates biological reproduction from sexual attraction. The baby in her tummy has nothing to do with her being queer, lesbian, cis, or any other sexual orientation.