Michigan loses a top recruit
- Thread starter 4IUfourever
- Start date
Another drunken uncle response. Barely coherent and makes you shake your head. Are you investing half into Donovan’s horse farm? Is it a done deal?
How did YOU get so confused. We were talking about Juwan and Archies recent recruiting classes because you said MU and Juwan were recruiting Head and shoulders above IU. I pointed out the fact that with Landers committing and reclassifying to ‘20 that our class and MU’s classes were similar or IU’s was a little better. We didn’t mention anything about their records but of course you bring that up when that has nothing to do with what we were talking about. I’m done. Man you wear me out. Let’s just agree to disagree a lot.
It’s like trying to reason with your little brother. He’s just there to annoy and harass.
Michigan’s class is ranked 13th even after losing their best recruit to overseas league. Ours is ranked 40th. Facts are facts.
If Juwan misses the tournament the next two years and his recruiting falls back to classes in the 30s and 40s then he will be equal to Archie.
I mean, they do have a extra player to boost those ratings. You know, the more players a team has in a class, the higher the ranking...
Facts are facts.
Last edited:
And of course you are not counting Lander in that ‘20 class. A 5* recruit #12 overall and #1 point guard and we move into the top 15 top 10 team rankings and that had been the whole discussion. You kept saying that Juwan was recruiting head and shoulders above Archie and I have proved you wrong. So that’s it. You have your opinion I have mine. I am done with this thread. You have continually seen the negative (always) and I see the positives. Yeah u must be just a pleasure to live with. But I digress. You are counting us as 40 without Lander. But that still doesn’t matter. Our recruiting is grinding up with a 5* and 4* in the last 2 months and MU loses a 5* recruit. Just accept on this one issue you are wrong. Juwan is not recruiting head and shoulders above Archie. So please stop. It’s over. I am sure you will respond but I cannot continue when you just pick the facts you want.
The more recruits a team has, the higher the rankings as well.
Is NC States class a great class? They have one five star, two four stars and two three stars. One of the four stars is just inside the top 70 and the other is outside the top 100. That means that three of their 5 incoming recruits aren't top 70 kids, and one just barely makes it at 69.
That is a top 10 class.
The more kids you have in your class, the higher it is rated.
Last edited:
I tried to explain this already. He must’ve skipped comprehension in school.
That’s a really good class. We have one guy barely in the top 100 and 2 in the 100-150 range. Plus potentially Lander who might be in the 50-70 range in 2020? Big difference between the two.
I will bet you board banishment that if Lander reclassifies that he will not be ranked in the 50-70 range.
Take the bet if you're so confident.
And when is 84 barely inside the top 100?
It’s a decent, middle of the pack in the BiG class. Not great, certainly not awful.
Do you know what “might” means? They’ve probably already put out the final rankings.
Why would the final ranking include a player who hasn’t technically reclassified yet? Follow-up: what’s with the poop-tinted glasses?
Similar threads
