Here's another list.
I understand your good argument. I prefer that certain aspects of the matter - misuse, alteration - make for an automatic dismissal. Saves money, removes the incentive of the plaintiff's bar to file bad suits just to get paid to go away. Lawyers get paid for worthless cases just because the cost of pursuing the matter by the defendant is untenable. I'm driving at a legislative enactment because some of the states have codified their law rather than allow common law to evolve with each decision. Resorting to federal common law would put the states jurisprudence under the thumb of the federal courts, eliminate state case law and make statutes worthless and that is never a good thing.
Will he and his entourage be staying there? Surely he won't pass up a chance to bump their revenues.
TheVegasHoosier said said:
Don't leave out:
I was commenting on why evil in the world ie shooters and cancer is not a good reason to deny God's existence. Jesus is the embodiment of the mind of God. As God's Son clothed in human flesh he perfectly represents who the Father is and what His Will is. Jesus told Phillip in John 14, "If you have seen me you have seen the Father". By Christ's death we see the great love of God in sending His Son to die for sinful human beings. Every little one is brought into the presence of God and cancer will no longer plague them. Every sorrow on Earth will vanish in the next life. As John the Apostle said at the end of the Book of Revelation 21:4 and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.The issue when reciting these is the people who don't hold the bible in such high regard, simply see you reading this scripture as nothing more than you reading a fictitious novel written by a 1st century author. They just turn their head to the side and curl their nose. You have every right to pick and choose your favorite sentences/paragraphs and unravel/decipher them to equate to a meaning that best fits the message you feel most driven by; however, understand that to others it very well sounds like crazy man talk. It just does. That's not to hinder you from your own beliefs but to educate you on what others who don't believe, see when you do that. Like what do you think if/when you would hear someone perform an exorcism? Would you shake your head and gasp?
- "Friend, I understand the pain of this world" but as the all mighty creator, there is nothing I can do?
- To that, "we live here and can't escape it?" What? Why do we have to set forth a world where escaping is something we even would want to do? He created this place just as he wanted because he could.
- So his mission is to expect people to believe random stories that completely defy logic off nothing but blind faith? To bend on one knee to thank and worship this creator? What great person in your life do you know asks you to bend on a knee and thank them for the greatness they exude? And if you don't, they say you shall burn for eternity. You see a savior and a guy we should be looking up to and worshiping? Sounds more ruthless than the "put the lotion on the skin or else it gets the hose again" guy....
The question remains: do you agree with Aloha that Trump is a despicable man?
Thumpers (not a holistic knock on those of faith) tend to resort to unpersuasive, conclusory, nearly meaningless Bible-ish gobbledygook citation of PHRASES as if doing so revealed some deeper truth or meaning instead of a useless utterance of phrases.
That’s an appalling equivalence between a smart literate poster and a crazy illiterate poster. I question your judgment.
Another "technically right". Automatic weapons are not prohibited in Nevada by Nevada law. They are prohibited in Nevada and every other state by Federal law - the 1935 fire arms act and again by an Act in 1986. So, Nevada won't arrest you for violating their law, the feds will. Nevada, therefore, doesn't need a law since federal laws apply in Nevada.
You own a company which makes construction saws equipped with the highest quality guards and plastered with warnings and safety instructions about use and maintenance and comes in the box along with instructions for preparation and use. The 2nd guy to use it decides to take off the guard and is badly injured in operating the saw without the factory installed guard. He sues YOU for several million he claims is your fault, but you sold them a safe saw that they altered to an unsafe condition. Are you liable for his injuries? Should his alteration amount to a defense?
They aren't "silencers" in that they do not render the discharge of the weapon silent - even though H. Clinton, imbecile, seems to think so and appears to have said so publicly to her own shame. They are suppressors and you can hear them fired a long way off. Don't believe the movies.
You’re going to have to carefully specify “alteration” when it comes to these gun nerd long guns. Customization is the name of the game to these of the tiny-week military wanna-be variety. Are you saying that if somebody puts a bump stock on it indemnifies the seller?
I thought you could own an automatic weapon as long as it was manufactured prior to 1985 and you had the right license?
The most butthurt poster in this board’s history likes your post. I wish you would go away.
Why don't you explain to me how, as a man of God, you can look yourself in the mirror after voting for a despicable person like Donald Trump?
