https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-fox-news-interview-41d02466eddf3be38126008470335803
Described as High Risk — High Reward
Described as High Risk — High Reward
Kamala Harris booked exclusive interview with Brett Baier on Fox
- Thread starter TomEric4756
- Start date
Brett has the chops to avoid making Harris look like a victim.
Word salads won’t get the job done.
Will the real “Opportunity Economy” get disclosed?
Word salads won’t get the job done.
Will the real “Opportunity Economy” get disclosed?
What can be, unburdened by what has been
Could've been a second debate but Trump was afraid of getting his ass kicked by Harris again.
And during that interview, Trump will complain about Fox News giving her time on their network.
He's such a whiny little bitch.
Madam vice president. The nonconfined docket has doubled under your stewardship.
And that’s why I’m building an opportunity economy. It’s really about the significance of the passage of time. Okay. BWAHAHAHAHHA YOU KNOW WHAT IM SAYIN BWAHAHAHAHAHA. YOU FEEL ME. But we can’t go back. People are ready to turn the page. And we’re not gonna go back. Cuz I know what we can be, unburdened by what has been.
It's already started. What a crybaby.
It's hard to imagine going through life where you see everything that doesn't personally benefit you or that you enjoy immensely is a personal slight or affront to you. But that's how Trump is. If someone isn't kissing his ass, he complains about being treated 'very badly.'
He's truly insufferable. Probably why he doesn't have any real, legitimate friends.
He's a sociopath. And pathologically narcissistic. And who the fvck knows what else.
Ha...I saw that. I also saw that he said Kamala Harris's seasonal allergies are a 'dangerous situation' that will 'impact her functioning.'
What a piece of work he is.
He had more events than Kamala and she hid Biden's condition from the country. It's a desperate move by her to bring this up.
That makes no sense. Biden has nothing to do with Trump’s medical condition. He’s the old deteriorating grazer in the race now.
Yeah the guy who was shot and gets up yelling, "fight fight fight". He is a real whiner. Realistically how would Harris have responded if she was grazed on the ear?
He is a real whiner. He bitches and moans about everything he thinks doesn’t go his way.
One question I hope he asks her: would she sign legislation increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court if it landed on her desk?
Because it’s something voters should definitively know.
I’m sure she’d give some kind of mealy-mouthed answer that deftly avoids even suggesting Yes or No — like “it’s something that we should study” — let alone unequivocally answering it.
But it’s a big issue, many Dems in Congress are pledging to do it. So we need to know where she stands.
We need "studies" on reparations. SMH.
Just use this one. Then stop talking about it.
It doesn't matter even if she says no unequivocally. She would absolutely sign it. All Dems are radicals. If you didn't learn from the moderate lunch pail Joe, Scranton Joe BS the media fed you then you are hopeless at this point.
I
I thought I was pretty clear. I stated that she hid Biden's condition. Why would you respond with "Biden has nothing to do with Trump's medical condition". No shit, I never said that.
Are you saying Trump was a badass after only being "grazed on the ear?" Just want to be clear.
Why is it I don't believe "all" Dems are radical (whatever that mesns) and "all" Pubs are racists (whatever that means) ?
We are in the season of negative political advertising dominating our media (television, radio, websites, etc.) which makes us think those in the other psrty are "all" without virtue, or what is normal, or those without common sense ( whatever that means).
Because you're not a partisan hack.
Now is the time for Pete to give her the answers through an earpiece if there ever was one. She’ll be accused of it anyway.
Yeah, but we established over the past 4 years that doesn't matter. Nor does ducking journalists because you are "ahead" and don't need to expose yourself to a potential misstep.
Biden set the rules on what is expected of old geezers running for office.
So, if the Dems end up with a trifecta, you think they’ll eliminate the filibuster, pass a bill expanding the court with 50-51 votes in the Senate, and the bill will be signed by President Harris?
The CW in the 2021-22 Congress was that Manchin and Sinema weren’t on board with the idea (or, for that matter, for nixing the filibuster to do that or anything else). But I always suspected there were some other Dems who opposed the idea, but just didn’t say so for fear of blowback from the left.
Here’s a question: would Republicans get out ahead of the Dems by doing this if they ended up with a trifecta?
I sure hope not. Elected officials of both parties need to stop moving the norms goalposts.
Similar threads
