That is 100% false.
Just when I thought the democrats couldn’t be more disgusting . . .
- Thread starter CO. Hoosier
- Start date
Speaking of plotting to steal it. Looks like the Dems are using the 2020 playbook again.
Trump Isn’t Playing to Win the Election, He’s Plotting to Steal It
Team Trump know they have lost. Cue the fake polls, false claims of voter fraud, and any other malign trick they can dream up to subvert democracy.www.thedailybeast.com
There most definitely will be “questions about cheating.” It’s called campaign strategy by some.
You're free to investigate
I don't know why you wouldn't believe it - this was rampant in swing states in 2020
Biden illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Pence illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Trump illegally having tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump refusing to cooperate regarding his tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump and his lawyers lying and claiming that he didn't even have tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump showing classified documents to show off to civilians who shouldn't have access, even in a SCIF, if not OK
Summary
The crime is not OK
An even greater magnitude of the crime is even more not OK.
The coverup is even more not OK
The lying over and over and over and over is even more not OK.
Got the picture?
probably not
/cult
Dumbass. Willingness to cooperate is a mitigating factor in sentencing, not a determinate of bringing charges.
Unless you think letting a bank robber go after he gets caught but returns the money willingly is OK.
Biden not being prosecuted not OK.
Blow .08, dui. Blow a .18, still dui. It's still the same crime. Magnitude can be addressed as an enhancement.
what about resisting arrest, impeding an investigation, lying, etc.
those are extra crimes
Separate crimes.
You are missing the point. Trump was indicted for the same crime biden wasn't.
Your argument is not fact-based nor responsive to what the other poster accurately set forth.
Trump obstructed justice.
In addition to taking the documents, he was charged in five counts relating to conspiracy to obstruct justice and withholding documents and records. He was also charged with making false statements.
You can't possibly be this stupid. Oh, wait. It's you. Never mind.
It’s not OK, but it was a fraction of the number of documents Trump had, there’s no evidence it was deliberate as there is with Trump and Biden didn’t try to illegally keep them like Trump did.
I’d be good with prosecuting Biden under the gross negligence standard of the law but they couldn’t do it until January when he’s out of office. They didn’t prosecute HRC under that standard either. I thought they should have. I’m a stickler on the issue and Trump should most definitely be prosecuted.
Last edited:
See, that's one of the big problems with your movement. If someone opposes Trump and/or has a different ideology than him/you, then they're immediately a bad person. But your leader/idol demonizes his opponents and/or anyone he doesn't like on a daily basis, so it's not surprising that you'd follow suit.
No. 1960 is the election that may have been flipped due to voter fraud. None since could have been.
Some of you guys have no issue with lies or linking to liars. It is sad to see.
You are a “lock her up” hypocrite on this issue. And obstruction of justice is a separate crime that he’s been charged with, lying dumbass.
And Nixon gracefully accepted the results.
Wrong. There are different standards under the law. Deliberate mishandling of classified information is a much higher level than gross negligence in handling classified information. I have extensive knowledge and experience with handling classified information.
Nobody ever thought that.
TIC. Good lawyers are the backbone of liberty, IMHO.
Then you've studied at the feet of the masters.
1) Person one is stopped for speeding. Doing 70 in a 55. He pulls over, presents papers to the cop, cooperates, has a clean record, admits to making a mistake, and the cop just gives him a warning.
2) Person two is stopped for speeding. Doing 90 in a 55. Cop tries to pull him over, but he bolts. They stop him with stop sticks. He refuses to cooperate or present his papers. He gets a $200 ticket, plus time in the slammer for the multiple other offenses.
Same crime, different punishment.
24/7/365
Uh no. #2 first off isnt stopped in your example.
It becomes an additional crime at the point of speeding away.
Wtf?
both were speeding. We could make them both doing 70 in a 55 if you want.
One was a jackass
One was not
The jackass gets the speeding ticket and gets everything else
The non jackass drives away happy and ticketless
Trump is the jackass
Pence and Biden are the non jackasses
This seems hard for you. Too much fluoride?
One was a jackass
One was not
The jackass gets the speeding ticket and gets everything else
The non jackass drives away happy and ticketless
Trump is the jackass
Pence and Biden are the non jackasses
This seems hard for you. Too much fluoride?
Ok, prosecute Trump 21Jan2029 then. But Hillary starts today and Joe in a couple months. Equal equal.
After all my explanations of this you still don't understand that they're not at all the same. On the seriousness scale, Trump is at 100 and the others are at 20, if that. Once again, I'd be good with prosecuting all of them, but that's not going to happen. They've made the determination that gross negligence, which is the most they could get for HRC, Pence and Biden for (without obstruction of justice or conspiracy to obstruct justice). Let's be clear - anyone that said "lock her up" about HRC and defends Trump is a huge hypocrite. It's not even debatable.
