That is 100% false.Well, you're free to vote accordingly. But people need to stop spreading BS about the 2020 election. Even Trump's own lawyers knew it was a lie.
That is 100% false.Well, you're free to vote accordingly. But people need to stop spreading BS about the 2020 election. Even Trump's own lawyers knew it was a lie.
Speaking of plotting to steal it. Looks like the Dems are using the 2020 playbook again.Trump Isn’t Playing to Win the Election, He’s Plotting to Steal It
Team Trump know they have lost. Cue the fake polls, false claims of voter fraud, and any other malign trick they can dream up to subvert democracy.www.thedailybeast.com
There most definitely will be “questions about cheating.” It’s called campaign strategy by some.
Who are the "worst people," and what makes them so bad?
I'd like to hear the whole/real story.Speaking of plotting to steal it. Looks like the Dems are using the 2020 playbook again.
What’s disgusting is how Trump and his team have destroyed faith in our elections. Possibly permanently. I’m a strongly against voter fraud and have argued for measures to prevent it for years, but I’ve not argued that it’s so prevalent that it has changed the results of Presidential elections because it hasn’t in my voting lifetime. Trump claims he lost 2020 due to voter fraud to this day. He knows that’s a lie, but a large percentage of Republicans believe his lie. That’s our moron faction, but they’re loud about it. This is 100 percent unforgivable for me and one of the reasons I’m convinced Trump is unfit for office. The top reason remains that I’m convinced Trump is mentally unstable.
You're free to investigateI'd like to hear the whole/real story.
Biden illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.But biden having classified documents in his Delaware garage is OK?
People get frustrated by the unequal application of the law. Seems dems get away with a lot more.
Dumbass. Willingness to cooperate is a mitigating factor in sentencing, not a determinate of bringing charges.Biden illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Pence illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Trump illegally having tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump refusing to cooperate regarding his tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump and his lawyers lying and claiming that he didn't even have tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump showing classified documents to show off to civilians who shouldn't have access, even in a SCIF, if not OK
Summary
The crime is not OK
An even greater magnitude of the crime is even more not OK.
The coverup is even more not OK
The lying over and over and over and over is even more not OK.
Got the picture?
probably not
/cult
Biden not being prosecuted not OK.Biden illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Pence illegally having a few classified documents is not OK.
Trump illegally having tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump refusing to cooperate regarding his tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump and his lawyers lying and claiming that he didn't even have tons of classified documents is not OK.
Trump showing classified documents to show off to civilians who shouldn't have access, even in a SCIF, if not OK
Summary
The crime is not OK
An even greater magnitude of the crime is even more not OK.
The coverup is even more not OK
The lying over and over and over and over is even more not OK.
Got the picture?
probably not
/cult
what about resisting arrest, impeding an investigation, lying, etc.Blow .08, dui. Blow a .18, still dui. It's still the same crime. Magnitude can be addressed as an enhancement.
Separate crimes.what about resisting arrest, impeding an investigation, lying, etc.
those are extra crimes
Dumbass. Willingness to cooperate is a mitigating factor in sentencing, not a determinate of bringing charges.
Unless you think letting a bank robber go after he gets caught but returns the money willingly is OK.
It’s not OK, but it was a fraction of the number of documents Trump had, there’s no evidence it was deliberate as there is with Trump and Biden didn’t try to illegally keep them like Trump did.But biden having classified documents in his Delaware garage is OK?
People get frustrated by the unequal application of the law. Seems dems get away with a lot more.
See, that's one of the big problems with your movement. If someone opposes Trump and/or has a different ideology than him/you, then they're immediately a bad person. But your leader/idol demonizes his opponents and/or anyone he doesn't like on a daily basis, so it's not surprising that you'd follow suit.Look in the mirror and you'll see one.
A liar linking liars - again.Speaking of plotting to steal it. Looks like the Dems are using the 2020 playbook again.
No. 1960 is the election that may have been flipped due to voter fraud. None since could have been.Were you alive in 1960?
You are a “lock her up” hypocrite on this issue. And obstruction of justice is a separate crime that he’s been charged with, lying dumbass.Dumbass. Willingness to cooperate is a mitigating factor in sentencing, not a determinate of bringing charges.
Unless you think letting a bank robber go after he gets caught but returns the money willingly is OK.
And Nixon gracefully accepted the results.No. 1960 is the election that may have been flipped due to voter fraud. None since could have been.
Wrong. There are different standards under the law. Deliberate mishandling of classified information is a much higher level than gross negligence in handling classified information. I have extensive knowledge and experience with handling classified information.Biden not being prosecuted not OK.
Blow .08, dui. Blow a .18, still dui. It's still the same crime. Magnitude can be addressed as an enhancement.
Nobody ever thought that.MODS...
we need to change the thread title to
"just when I thought that lawyers couldn't be more disgusting..."
Then you've studied at the feet of the masters.I learned about election fraud studying the Chicago Daley Machine. Long time ago.
1) Person one is stopped for speeding. Doing 70 in a 55. He pulls over, presents papers to the cop, cooperates, has a clean record, admits to making a mistake, and the cop just gives him a warning.Separate crimes.
You are missing the point. Trump was indicted for the same crime biden wasn't.
I am glad that my kids never became drug dealers, pimps, Trumpers, or lawyers.Nobody ever thought that.
TIC. Good lawyers are the backbone of liberty, IMHO.
Uh no. #2 first off isnt stopped in your example.1) Person one is stopped for speeding. Doing 70 in a 55. He pulls over, presents papers to the cop, cooperates, has a clean record, admits to making a mistake, and the cop just gives him a warning.
2) Person two is stopped for speeding. Doing 90 in a 55. Cop tries to pull him over, but he bolts. They stop him with stop sticks. He refuses to cooperate or present his papers. He gets a $200 ticket, plus time in the slammer for the multiple other offenses.
Same crime, different punishment.
24/7/365
The issue we were discussing was election fraud. The Daley Machine is exhibit 1A.Then you've studied at the feet of the masters.
Ok, prosecute Trump 21Jan2029 then. But Hillary starts today and Joe in a couple months. Equal equal.It’s not OK, but it was a fraction of the number of documents Trump had, there’s no evidence it was deliberate as there is with Trump and Biden didn’t try to illegally keep them like Trump did.
I’d be good with prosecuting Biden under the gross negligence standard of the law but they couldn’t do it until January when he’s out of office. They didn’t prosecute HRC under that standard either. I thought they should have. I’m a stickler on the issue and Trump should most definitely be prosecuted.
After all my explanations of this you still don't understand that they're not at all the same. On the seriousness scale, Trump is at 100 and the others are at 20, if that. Once again, I'd be good with prosecuting all of them, but that's not going to happen. They've made the determination that gross negligence, which is the most they could get for HRC, Pence and Biden for (without obstruction of justice or conspiracy to obstruct justice). Let's be clear - anyone that said "lock her up" about HRC and defends Trump is a huge hypocrite. It's not even debatable.Ok, prosecute Trump 21Jan2029 then. But Hillary starts today and Joe in a couple months. Equal equal.
Yes, 'good' lawyers are. That leaves out many 'ungood' lawyers.Nobody ever thought that.
TIC. Good lawyers are the backbone of liberty, IMHO.
okay. great. we're glad you finally showed up. let's try to stay in the threads and topics that matter. this is a big nightYes, 'good' lawyers are. That leaves out many 'ungood' lawyers.
Maybe they could remake Pat Garrett and Billy the Kidboth were speeding. We could make them both doing 70 in a 55 if you want.
One was a jackass
One was not
The jackass gets the speeding ticket and gets everything else
The non jackass drives away happy and ticketless
Trump is the jackass
Pence and Biden are the non jackasses
This seems hard for you. Too much fluoride?
Just got in my hotel in Wythville, VA for the evening. I wanted to get a ways out of Charlotte before driving to Indiana tomorrow.okay. great. we're glad you finally showed up. let's try to stay in the threads and topics that matter. this is a big night
You've said it 1,000 times. With this post I've disagreed 1,001 times. You can not, via written law nor especially the implicated law, that there are any differences other than, "well Trump and I hate him".After all my explanations of this you still don't understand that they're not at all the same. On the seriousness scale, Trump is at 100 and the others are at 20, if that. Once again, I'd be good with prosecuting all of them, but that's not going to happen. They've made the determination that gross negligence, which is the most they could get for HRC, Pence and Biden for (without obstruction of justice or conspiracy to obstruct justice). Let's be clear - anyone that said "lock her up" about HRC and defends Trump is a huge hypocrite. It's not even debatable.
That’s an elementary school level view.Lawyers threatening lawyers with lawyerly shit and COH is outraged. This is delicious.
You still don’t understand. They are not in any way equivalent. It amazes me that you cannot understand this very simple fact.You've said it 1,000 times. With this post I've disagreed 1,001 times. You can not, via written law nor especially the implicated law, that there are any differences other than, "well Trump and I hate him".
You will post a response, then I will in reply.
My goal for all white, black, red, green, brown, rich, poor, politician, NON politician people is equal application of the law, not only the written but also the intent of the law.
You are for... Well, it's Trump and Msm said "he humped my mom once, and she liked it".
The beat goes on. I've got 1,003 set up, so bring on your next. I'm pretty sure we both know that neither will stop.
Equally can't understand how you think they are not equal. Honestly, Buyden and Clintons are 100x worse due to time of possession and total lack of tracking from DC. You have ZERO solid land to stand on here. ZERO. DC and the swamp have spent 50+ years covering up for your preferred MIC accomplices. You Only prefer The swamp that protects your employer and thus your paycheck. Every one here knows it. Just come clean. Joe and Hillary used all of those doc's for their own personal gain. HELL, Joe even admitted using them for a $$$ Book.You still don’t understand. They are not in any way equivalent. It amazes me that you cannot understand this very simple fact.
I'm sure someone else said this, but they're just saying make sure you base your litigation on actual facts based on evidence. Don't just rely on a bunch of old me on message boards and a bloated Presidential candidate trying to stay out of jail.They fly below my lowest expectations.
Marc Elias, Harris’s chief election lawyer warns all lawyers not to represent Trump lest they face loss of clients, loss of firm partnerships, or official license discipline.
Progressives Threaten Conservative Election Attorneys in Advance of 2024 Election - Tennessee Star
Progressive activists are warning conservative election attorneys to avoid getting involved in litigation over the 2024 election or they will have their jobs threatened, will be targeted for disbarment, and even prosecuted.tennesseestar.com
Pull quote:
Progressive activists are warning conservative election attorneys to avoid getting involved in litigation over the 2024 election or they will have their jobs threatened, will be targeted for disbarment, and even prosecuted.This is deliberate interference with the attorney client relationship. It interferes with the fair administration of justice. It’s attorney misconduct. There is no way to know whether future litigation about the 2024 election has merit or not. The democrats are running this message as a political ad with the only possible intent to suppress any questions about cheating.
This message, op ed and advertising should itself subject all the attorneys involved to discipline.