It isn't in schools
- Thread starter IUCrazy2
- Start date
Smart. Catholic is way better. No virtue-signaling masks. No lockdowns. And they removed zippers from all the priests' pants. All good now
Here in Indy, there have been a couple of clashes in the last few years between the Archdiocese and staff members in same sex marriages.
I'll bet that opens up all kinds of discussions in the student body.
Also, check out stories out of Worcester about the Nativity School flying Pride and BLM flags, much to the chagrin of the Bishop.
Can't stay insulated forever.
For a guy with 4 degrees - 2 from the Ivy League, supposedly - you are amazingly juvenile.
Last edited:
It's even more ridiculous when he claims to have me on ignore. lol
Yet, he somehow knows what I post......
It’s like the President elections. They both suck but you have to pick 1.
Like same sex couples in multiple story problems. Teaching of Islam in a reading comprehension exercise. Those are both examples from my 4th graders coursework. These should not be in elementary coursework.
Thank you.
So, are you against the inclusion of all couples in story problems? Also, interested in how Islam is "taught". Are you against all religion being taught in school? I've seen several posters on here complain about things being covered at the expense of academic time. Will you have the same problem if the Bible is covered at Catholic school, or is that okay?
What is the name of the textbook company? Are we talking Indiana?
Yes, Indiana.
In elementary I am against these types of subjects. These are issues for at home with parents. I was a public school kid and don’t remember ever remember doing reading comprehension on Muhammad the profit. (That was the subject of the reading). (Or Jesus for that matter!)
I just don’t understand why they don’t use unisex names. When you clearly use the names of 2 females you’re clearly pushing an issue. It’s not hard to say “Taylor and Lindsey” or something similar.
If they go to catholic school and get taught religion, I’m fine with that. We’re a traditional Christian values family just like the majority of the US.
In elementary I am against these types of subjects. These are issues for at home with parents. I was a public school kid and don’t remember ever remember doing reading comprehension on Muhammad the profit. (That was the subject of the reading). (Or Jesus for that matter!)
I just don’t understand why they don’t use unisex names. When you clearly use the names of 2 females you’re clearly pushing an issue. It’s not hard to say “Taylor and Lindsey” or something similar.
If they go to catholic school and get taught religion, I’m fine with that. We’re a traditional Christian values family just like the majority of the US.
Hard to argue with any of that.
Glad you have the wherewithal to afford private Catholic school...just don't ask for any of my money via tuition vouchers.
Why shouldn’t students/parents get to choose where they spend their money for school? It is their tax dollars.
In school ..
I read about Marx. I'm not communist.
I read about homosexuality. I'm not a homosexual.
I read about Islam. I'm not muslim.
I read about Christ. I'm not Christian.
I read about Hitler. I'm not a nazi.
You guys believe kids look to their teachers, textbooks and lessons as role models for their opinions and maps for their life choices...... laughable.
They believe old ass teachers, and stupid text books (and most parents) are lame AF and out of touch...
If you don't want your kids to be indoctrinated into current societal norms, lock them in their room, take away their phone and keep them away from other kids. Besides that they do what they feel is right, form their own opinions with help from their peers, regardless and in spite of what a school, text book, teacher or even parent thinks.
Are you guys really this out of touch with reality?
The irony, that I can't ignore .. is that the ones complaining the loudest HAVE been groomed by memes, bots, and entertainment news into this and other bullshit radicalized belief. Hilarious ... hopefully the kids are not as weak minded as a bunch of disgruntled boomers.
Look in the god damn mirror ..
I read about Marx. I'm not communist.
I read about homosexuality. I'm not a homosexual.
I read about Islam. I'm not muslim.
I read about Christ. I'm not Christian.
I read about Hitler. I'm not a nazi.
You guys believe kids look to their teachers, textbooks and lessons as role models for their opinions and maps for their life choices...... laughable.
They believe old ass teachers, and stupid text books (and most parents) are lame AF and out of touch...
If you don't want your kids to be indoctrinated into current societal norms, lock them in their room, take away their phone and keep them away from other kids. Besides that they do what they feel is right, form their own opinions with help from their peers, regardless and in spite of what a school, text book, teacher or even parent thinks.
Are you guys really this out of touch with reality?
The irony, that I can't ignore .. is that the ones complaining the loudest HAVE been groomed by memes, bots, and entertainment news into this and other bullshit radicalized belief. Hilarious ... hopefully the kids are not as weak minded as a bunch of disgruntled boomers.
Look in the god damn mirror ..
Last edited:
I don't care where they spend their money...have at it. But my money?
So, you would be okay with your tax dollars going to a Wiccan school?
I think I'd rather have a bunch of thoughtless people in charge over a bunch of elites who think the know it all and know what's good for everyone when, if fact, they don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
Good to see you’re down with school choice. You’re talking to a 2000 Wiccan High graduate.
Last edited:
The Horned Gods. It was a wild 4 years.
You had me fooled. I always assumed you were a homosexual Christian nazi.
This is is the pure Leftist game......."nothing to see here". It gets old.
Yes.....if its the same amount of taxpayer $ wtf concern is it of his?
I see conservatives complaining about how their tax dollars are spent all the time. I guess you never do.
A lot of people don't know this, but the Bible says there were 5,000 men present. So the women and the children were not counted which means we would have to know the exact number of people which could be over 20,000 for it to be a proper math question.
Or they NEVER say "father" or "mother" and ALWAYS say parent or guardian. Because that's what we're talking about, not your bs example.
He gave you an answer. You asked him for examples and he gave you two. Then you went into your bs 21 question 'nothing to see here mode'. We're tired of playing your games.
I think I was pretty polite and thanked him. Of course, he's not the asshole you are on here. I was curious, and I know curiosity is the bane of the conservatives' existence.
BTW, mushy...my dad is still alive and sharper than you at 90 yo...in case you wanted to make any more jokes about him.
Is it ok if we say that men with promiscuous homosexual lifestyles are more prone than hetro males to HIV & other sexually transmitted disease; Hep A, B & C; anal cancer; Depression & Anxiety; body image and eating disorders; alcoholism, nicotine addition & other substance abuse; and domestic abuse?
Health issues for gay men and other men who have sex with men
Understand health concerns for gay men and other men who have sex with men, and learn how to promote good health.
www.mayoclinic.org
Should we mention the much greater %s of suicidal ideation, attempts and completed suicides?
Suicide Attempts Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Lifetime Prevalence and Antecedents - PMC
Objectives. We examined lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts and psychosocial correlates in a large population-based sample of men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods. A telephone probability sample of US urban MSM (n = 2881) were interviewed ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Has Florida released more examples? These examples may be random, may be the most egregious, may be least egregious. I would suspect the urge would be to show the most obvious
Riiiight.
Looking forward to your "nothing to see here" response.
I asked a question, a very legitimate question. If you don't know the answer why bother replying?
