Would love to hear more networks call AZ before I go to sleep. That will make for restful dreams.I'm going to retire on a high note. AZ works.
Would love to hear more networks call AZ before I go to sleep. That will make for restful dreams.I'm going to retire on a high note. AZ works.
That's why I need more news, dammit! I can't go with only Fox. I mean, they have a very good decision desk, but this is a crazy year, so I want confirmation.Fox seems to be the only one calling AZ? Guess so.
Ohio?NBC calls Ohio for Trump.
Apparently there are allegations that defects with some mail in ballots have been cured vs discarded. Will give rise to more suitsWhy do you say that?
Yeah, someone mentioned that earlier. Going to be a fight over that, but I think you were right to point out that the courts have been consistently pro-voter so far, and there's no reason to think that changes.Apparently there are allegations that defects with some mail in ballots have been cured vs discarded. Will give rise to more suits
Not at all. Everything happening tonight is well within what the polls said so far. Now if Trump starts winning the Midwest states, you might have a point. But as of now, this is pretty much right where the polls said it would be.Whether Trump wins or loses what's happening right now ought to tell you (if you're being honest with yourself) is that most of the mainstream media polls are complete unadulterated BS...
That feels different.Yeah, someone mentioned that earlier. Going to be a fight over that, but I think you were right to point out that the courts have been consistently pro-voter so far, and there's no reason to think that changes.
Fox just called Minnesota, too.
Agreed.I think Biden is now the favorite with AZ and MN in the fold, and assuming he gets the 1 vote in NE Biden can win without PA, which means Trump has to win TWO of MI, WI, and PA.
And GA and even NC are still in play...
Biden definitely in the driver's seat. It's just not what his supporters had hoped. Democrats really wanted to win this tonight as a repudiation against Trumpism, and they aren't getting that. But he's still more likely to win than not.I think Biden is now the favorite with AZ and MN in the fold, and assuming he gets the 1 vote in NE Biden can win without PA, which means Trump has to win TWO of MI, WI, and PA.
And GA and even NC are still in play...
I think Biden is now the favorite with AZ and MN in the fold, and assuming he gets the 1 vote in NE Biden can win without PA, which means Trump has to win TWO of MI, WI, and PA.
And GA and even NC are still in play...
That's pretty much what it looks like.Doesn't it basically come down to who wins two of WI, MI, and PA?
That's pretty much what it looks like.
That's not what the talking heads are hinting at, but I guess we should watch just in case.Trump's going to declare himself the winner?
Yeah and that could result in a legal shit show if they split wi and mi. The idea of “curing” ballots is a different animal than the suits we’ve seen thus farDoesn't it basically come down to who wins two of WI, MI, and PA?
Yes, contrary to the Southern states the Midwestern states tend to report day-of votes first, is my understanding.And what we're looking at now is more in-person election vs. mail-in voting?
Yeah and that could result in a legal shit show if they split wi and mi. The idea of “curing” ballots is a different animal than the suits we’ve seen thus far
Trump's going to declare himself the winner?
Is it, really, though? That's rhetorical, obviously. I know nothing of PA election law, and I'm assuming you know all I know. So, if state law covers this issue, shouldn't we expect the courts to defer to them, as they generally have seemed willing to do, so far?Yeah and that could result in a legal shit show if they split wi and mi. The idea of “curing” ballots is a different animal than the suits we’ve seen thus far
Some PA voters were informed their ballots were flawed and given the opportunity to come in and fix the problems. Presumably we're talking about missing signatures and the like.What does 'curing' ballots mean?
Yeah I know nothing about it either. Spitballing tho it’s an affirmative act. It invites allegations of interference, fraud, bias, tampering, over zealousness etc. it’s of a different nature than counting a proper ballot and what the other suits have complainedIs it, really, though? That's rhetorical, obviously. I know nothing of PA election law, and I'm assuming you know all I know. So, if state law covers this issue, shouldn't we expect the courts to defer to them, as they generally have seemed willing to do, so far?
That's pretty much what it looks like.
Interesting take. I guess the hope is Biden wins WI and MI (and one of ME or NE) and it doesn't matter.Yeah I know nothing about it either. Spitballing tho it’s an affirmative act. It invites allegations of interference, tampering, over zealousness etc. it’s of a different nature than counting a proper ballot and what the other suits have complained
Is it, really, though? That's rhetorical, obviously. I know nothing of PA election law, and I'm assuming you know all I know. So, if state law covers this issue, shouldn't we expect the courts to defer to them, as they generally have seemed willing to do, so far?
For the sake of everyoneInteresting take. I guess the hope is Biden wins WI and MI (and one of ME or NE) and it doesn't matter.
I can't find it, because there are so many threads to look at. But I posted on Mon that in one of the PA counties people were lined up to go in and correct their mail-in votes. They had been notified by the County that they needed to do that, and it was all in accordance with PA state law...
I think your being overly pessimistic, at least until we get the final Iowa/Ohio numbers. I mean, Minnesota has been called already, so it's not like it's a region-wide flop.Considering how terrible Biden has shown in Iowa and Ohio compared with the polls.....anyone counting on MI/WI/PA to hold is grasping at a very weak string.
Obviously. This isn't a partisan point. Just recognizing that we should all hope whoever wins can do so without the intervention of courts.For the sake of everyone
That’s exactly my point. Again taking an affirmative act like curing will give rise to claims of fraud, bias, etc. I think without a law/Reg/rule on point that could get stickyObviously. This isn't a partisan point. Just recognizing that we should all hope whoever wins can do so without the intervention of courts.
Not at all. Everything happening tonight is well within what the polls said so far. Now if Trump starts winning the Midwest states, you might have a point. But as of now, this is pretty much right where the polls said it would be.