I still think IU fans are missing the point. You need the game, we don't. There's no incentive for us to play that game. When they debated seeding tournament teams, they list good wins/bad loses. IU would only make one of those for Kentucky. We don't need the game, yet we offered neutral sites, and IU declined.
A half truth at best. IU came back with a compromise of home and home and neutral site. Cal squirmed away.
Get your facts straight or stay on the Ky site where they still buy this crap.