That chant receives a better reaction than its chanters could have ever hoped for.
vs. this:
The TWO-SECOND "chant" is a consequence of whose "mentality" ?? Its future depends upon what ? The 200,000+ living Purdue alumni ??? Or the hundreds of 18-22 yr. olds that comprise the Paint Crew ??? The OP mentioned Greg Doyle. Which has WHAT to do with banners ??? Any chance that we all can just move on past the 2,784, 622 mentions of this ?
You really think Marshall would have been tons better than Archie? I don’t.
If it makes you feel any better I was told I'd be banned if I wasn't a good boy. I can't speak for GBI. I belong but have no idea of their tolerance level. I know Peegs banned people all the time. I got banned for using the term "creaned". This regime has been pretty fair to me. While I don't agree with the warning I will do my best to abide by it.
Never claimed that it was "just the kids" that joined in on "the chant". What constitutes "obsession" about I.U. would involve what % of the total Boiler fan base in all things athletic ?? Not that big of a number.
Hey, you posted last night that you were going to stop posting here. Honor your statement. silly broilee....
It certainly gets inside of Court’s head, which is why he repeatedly cries about it here. Funny stuff.
I replied to you last week. How soon you forget, silly. I am the origin. A broilee(s) is a derisive and ridiculing term referring to a pu fan that is insecure and envious of IU success, that posts stupidity on this board to gain attention. Sort of like you, since you are on your 4th or 5th name on this board. Broilees can also refer to a pu team or coaches, as they typically fit the above description. I made the term up, and it is oh so fitting of your type of poster.
It definitely wasn’t funny or clever, and accuracy is only relevant if there’s an actual comparison available.
Telling that he had to tap out of the facilities discussion after acknowledging he wasn’t well versed on the topic, especially after representing that he was.
No, it’s really moronic. Even you should realize it isn’t funny or clever. It literally makes no sense or has any tie to Purdue. I’m sure you aren’t college educated, but you do understand it’s not even a word, right?
Then why are you unable to comprehend what’s been written here? I realize you lack education, as you’ve admittted, but that’s really not an excuse for your lack of understanding. If you’re going to try and participate, you need to do better.
You weren’t able to contribute anything to the facilities discussion because, as you acknowledged, you haven’t been exposed to any other conference schools beyond iu and Purdue. You were smart to tap out as it was clear you couldn’t add anything to the discussion. Not following the program closely or the BiG Ten in general made you a poor candidate for participation, yet you unwisely persisted, to your detriment.
Ah, there they are: the “lacking basic English” argument and the “lacking communication skills” argument, both in the same sentence. How long before Bigreddfredd pulls out the Godwin’s law argument?
