The decision is "fine" by me, the courts will hear it out and reach a final say. I'm not a constitutional scholar so what do I know? I just wish there was a system for courts to hear a case and rule to prevent the future mass eBay sell-off. I know there isn't, stupid system. "We cannot find this defendant guilty, but this is a clear violation of what the law is" would work perfect.
If the courts decide this appointment is invalid, fine. Like I said, I don't know. But if this were a poor Black, it would be called "getting off on a technicality" and the people cheering today would be grabbing pitchforks. Technicalities aren't bad, the law is the law. If the law demands Trump not face the charge, so be it.
But we really need an answer to what exactly a president is entitled to when they leave.