Is the library filled with books about ass sex? Or is it just a normal library?
We have a verdict -- Guilty on ALL counts
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
- Status
Trump insisted she did. Using your logic, that by itself makes him a terrible human.
Unfortunately for him, he couldn't get Comey and Sessions to buy in.
It’s scary how many people still do not have the slightest understanding of the Mueller report. Because DOnnie said completely exonerated, you guys believe that. There is and was plenty of evidence. I’ll point out just one. So you have an explanation for why Paul Manafort was passing voter rolls and information to the Russians? What possible reason can you dream up for that? Start there….
I don’t think so Aloha. The Rittenhouse case is probably the clearest example. There’s no doubt that he was innocent but you really want to take your chances trying that case in Manhattan? There are still leftists that will label him a murderer. Many on this board.
Bullshit. If the rules were the same. Trump, Biden, Pence, and Hillary would all be prosecuted. Look in the mirror for the hypocrisy.
I’ve never heard of a library like that. You’ve probably never stepped foot in one, so you wouldn’t know.
I read quite a bit actually. It’s why my command of the English language is much better than your 3rd grade tirades.
That's impressive reading, Stoll. The counter says TMP has only posted 23617 messages, maybe you missed one along the way.
I don’t get how in the world people don’t get that! But we never prosecute Presidents!!!! Duh. We aren’t usually stupid enough to ELECT a known criminals to the highest office in the land.
Thank you for doing the work. It’s hard to believe how many people just took Trump and his minions at his word and believed there was nothing in the Mueller report. Bill Barr did some heavy lifting on that one. And lived to regret it.
Because we can understand the legal claims, recognize the stupidity of same, and realize that the Soros prosecutor campaigned on finding something, anything. You don’t think the same could be done to Biden? He had classified docs in a garage. Grow up
Well for being such a reader, you certainly couldn’t even read a couple paragraphs and pick out the important information from it.
Be honest with yourself. If Trump wanted an AG that would go get Hillary, he could’ve gotten one.
As much as you try to demonize him, when he won he was willing to let bygones be bygones. He put the greater interest of the country first.
And now you guys have come along and shit all over the whole political process.
You're not going to "win" any arguments like this.
All decent people can do in this day and age is refuse to alter personal barometers on decency and principles, show good faith in all deeds, and resist the easy temptation of grievance, insecurity, petulance, parochialism and bigotry that has overwhelmed vast numbers of likely once-reasonable people.
No I don’t think the same can be done to Biden because I don’t think he is someone who has been a known criminal his entire lifetime. Could you find something on anyone, sure. Has his entire life been a criminal enterprise? No, it has not.
That is world class misrepresentation. The kind that indicates an extremely dishonorable person.
I’m confused is it Russian collusion he’s guilty of? Or obstructing his own DOJ?
If we’re going to imprison presidents for meddling in their own DOJ we better save room in Trump’s cell for Obama, Bush II, Clinton and Carter.
The prosecutor literally said there’s enough to indict Biden. This case. Being mushy peas saved him. That doesn’t make him better. He’s been in gov 50 years. He should or did know better
Who knows what the 10 percent to the big guy and the whistleblower shit will yield of trump wins
Dems politicized the judicial system federally - and locally with Soros backed prosecutors. If trump wins the other side of the coin will turn.
Not a net gain for the country.
There is also a lot of responsibility for Presidents and former Presidents. They should try to set an example for the country by making sure they pay their bills and obey the laws and not do things that look shady.
Don't bother responding with anything using words like "Biden", "progressive" or "Democrat." I'm talking about Trump this time.
None of us are winning any arguments here. I don’t feel the need to respond in good faith when someone asks if the library is filled with books on “ass sex”. That doesn’t deserve a serious discussion.
She should have lost her clearance, been prosecuted, found guilty, and put on probation and fined. That would have been just. Trump’s crimes in the document case are worthy of prison time.
In all seriousness and non-judgment, you do you.
For me, engaging in bad faith stuff that will never know any bounds only elevates the bad faith. While I'm certainly not above it, I don't have much interest in poking back at derangement. It doesn't gratify me.
I do think, though, about whether others are the audience. There are some likely reasonable people here. I'd rather engage with them. I'd think they - consciously or otherwise - would take note on who's rising above the chaos and who's just wallowing in the mud with the pigs. There's got to be a better way for those of us who want better and who are horrified by the turn things have taken with propagandized, gullible, bigoted, hate-mongers having an outsized influence on things that actually matter.
They shouldn’t do things that look shady.
Obama became president as a first term senator, former community organizer. Now he owns houses in DC and Martha’s Vineyard and has a net worth of probably around 100 million.
Is it “shady” that our presidents make bank off of their time in office? Or are we more amenable to the blatant corruption?
No that’s not what he literally said. He said that he didn’t think he could get a jury to indict because the president COULD present himself as “an elderly man with a poor memory. “ He also said that it “does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. “
Youre a shill. And kind of a terrible human.
Actually he's brilliant. And you're a caricature of a clown...
I appreciate that and know I should be better. Sometimes I’m just not. I’m listening to Righteous Minds right now, as recommended by Brad Stevens here, as an attempt to better understand.
Correct. But Fani Willis….. to put it kindly is not a smart person. She has surely made all sorts of missteps and mistakes.
Won’t be hard to destroy her life once Trump is back in office.
She’ll learn what happens when Atlanta idiots try to play in the big game. It’ll be similar to when Sherman went through there.
You don’t have a clue about the issue and a reason I no longer try to explain the huge differences between the cases. You choose invincible ignorance.
Hey! This is your typical critique of me. If you are gonna dilute it with more people, you lose your credibility.
Bragg didn’t campaign on that. James did that in Georgia. Bragg was actually reluctant to bring the case but succumbed to pressure from the left.
I can’t believe he was wrong. It was probably his first time 😉
If Trumps document case is a slam dunk, why do you think the FBI would stage allegedly photographic evidence, then leak or publish the fake evidence? That’s not a good look for the government.
Last edited:
No.
You call him "a terrible human being" only because he disagrees with you.
It’s actually not Aloha. It’s the facts of the Trump/ Russia relationship.
it’s a joke that this was allowed to hang over the majority of his term in office. **** these people.
Dishonorable is when government shills contort Harmless events into some sort of malevolence for political and personal gain. You are the one that is dishonorable.
"The Rittenhouse case is probably the clearest example. There’s no doubt that he was innocent but you really want to take your chances trying that case in Manhattan?"
So explain the difference between Rittenhouse murdering 2 people and Abbott in Texas pardoing a white nationalist who murdered a BLM demonstrator ?
Rittenhouse was found not guilty,even though 2 unarmed people died, by a jury in Wisconsin. Daniel Perry was found guilty by a jury in Texas. Yet Abbott decided to usurp the people's will and pardon a man who was unquestionably guilty and provoked the situation...
- Status
