Trump Trial - New York

[Hoopsdoc1978]

I think this is a terrible case, even if guilty it is the equivalent of driving 36 in a 35. But Hillary isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. The only thing they have here is that the corporation was involved, without that this wouldn't be a felony and I think there is no way they would have pushed only a misdemeanor case.

So I don't know what the state could have pursued with Clinton that is similar.

What do you mean by without the corporation this wouldn’t be a felony and they wouldn’t have pushed only a misdemeanor case?

The corporation WAS involved.

That doesn’t make the decision to create a case against Trump and not against Clinton look any better. It makes it look worse.

 

[Aloha Hoosier]

You said “Once the FEC acts it’s over so no legal case to be had.”

What did you mean by that?

That's what I understand is the case under federal law. I don't have any idea if that's true with state law, but my guess is that it would also apply along double jeopardy lines.

 

[Hoopsdoc1978]

That's what I understand is the case under federal law. I don't have any idea if that's true with state law, but my guess is that it would also apply along double jeopardy lines.

Maybe one of the lawyers can weigh in.

 

[Marvin the Martian]

What do you mean by without the corporation this wouldn’t be a felony and they wouldn’t have pushed only a misdemeanor case?

The corporation WAS involved.

That doesn’t make the decision to create a case against Trump and not against Clinton look any better. It makes it look worse.

There is a case against Trump because of the corporation. That is the only reason this law fits him. He is charged with falsifying corporate records. Clinton did not pay through a corporate account so this law would not apply. How could you file this case against Clinton without corporate involvement?

 

[Hoopsdoc1978]

There is a case against Trump because of the corporation. That is the only reason this law fits him. He is charged with falsifying corporate records. Clinton did not pay through a corporate account so this law would not apply. How could you file this case against Clinton without corporate involvement?

Ahh, i misunderstood. I thought you were referring to Perkins Coe, the firm which the Clinton campaign was fined for misrepresenting payments to.

 

[DDE-6-20-23]

100 percent wrong. Every one of you devout deranged Trumpsters lack logic and reason.

 

[mushroomgod_1]

There is a case against Trump because of the corporation. That is the only reason this law fits him. He is charged with falsifying corporate records. Clinton did not pay through a corporate account so this law would not apply. How could you file this case against Clinton without corporate involvement?

this is weak

 

[Marvin the Martian]

this is weak

The case is weak. But the only felony they have is falsifying a business record. That wasn't present with Clinton. They are not apples-to-apples, that is a simple fact.

 

[dbmhoosier]

The case is weak. But the only misdemeanor they have is falsifying a business record. That wasn't present with Clinton. They are not apples-to-apples, that is a simple fact.

Fixed it for you. Also not even a misdemeanor. A reimbursement to your lawyer who you have on retainer is a legal expense. Hillary ordered her aides to destroy 13 iphones containing classified information with hammers.

 

[mushroomgod_1]

The case is weak. But the only felony they have is falsifying a business record. That wasn't present with Clinton. They are not apples-to-apples, that is a simple fact.

How can anyone take your nonsense seriously?

 

[Marvin the Martian]

How can anyone take your nonsense seriously?

Show me specifically where I am wrong. Show your math. Here is my math:

Thirty-four felony counts of violating a New York law on corporate record-keeping​

​

Tracking the Trump criminal cases: Latest on legal charges and key players

A definitive guide to the key players and legal risks in the four criminal probes of the former president.

www.politico.com

Trump faces 34 felony charges of falsifying business records with the intent to commit or conceal another crime relating to payments made to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to ensure her silence about an alleged sexual encounter between them.[a​

​

Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Below are the actual indictments, please refer to them and how the words "falsifying business records" keeps appearing over and over

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiz4eWuk7aGAxUolokEHdYAClYQFnoECDQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3p2JcNqg7utjg6Y4IWFx34

 

[anon_mya1phvcpf5x4]

I can understand disagreements on what is an appropriate level of punishment but does anyone really think falsifying business records is ok and shouldn't have any punishment?

 

[mushroomgod_1]

Show me specifically where I am wrong. Show your math. Here is my math:

Thirty-four felony counts of violating a New York law on corporate record-keeping​

​

Tracking the Trump criminal cases: Latest on legal charges and key players

A definitive guide to the key players and legal risks in the four criminal probes of the former president.

www.politico.com

Trump faces 34 felony charges of falsifying business records with the intent to commit or conceal another crime relating to payments made to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels to ensure her silence about an alleged sexual encounter between them.[a​

​

Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Below are the actual indictments, please refer to them and how the words "falsifying business records" keeps appearing over and over

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiz4eWuk7aGAxUolokEHdYAClYQFnoECDQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3p2JcNqg7utjg6Y4IWFx34

Here's where you're wrong.

None of your bullshit matters.

What does matter is that this is a sham prosecution coordinated by a lawless WH and amoral political party solely for the purpose of eliminating its primary political opposition.

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"....Lavently Beria. You are one of the useful idiots.

 

[T.M.P.]

Here's where your wrong.

None of your bullshit matters.

What does matter is that this is a sham prosecution coordinated by a lawless WH and amoral political party solely for the purpose of eliminating its primary political opposition.

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"....Lavently Beria. You are one of the useful idiots.

dumb

 

[Circlejoe]

Here's where your wrong.

None of your bullshit matters.

What does matter is that this is a sham prosecution coordinated by a lawless WH and amoral political party solely for the purpose of eliminating its primary political opposition.

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"....Lavently Beria. You are one of the useful idiots.

You're

 

[anon_mya1phvcpf5x4]

Here's where you're wrong.

None of your bullshit matters.

What does matter is that this is a sham prosecution coordinated by a lawless WH and amoral political party solely for the purpose of eliminating its primary political opposition.

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"....Lavently Beria. You are one of the useful idiots.

None of your partisan bull crap matters either

I give about as much credence to your highly biased opinion on political matters as I do to the crap I leave in the toilet

 

[Marvin the Martian]

Here's where you're wrong.

None of your bullshit matters.

What does matter is that this is a sham prosecution coordinated by a lawless WH and amoral political party solely for the purpose of eliminating its primary political opposition.

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"....Lavently Beria. You are one of the useful idiots.

I guess it is better to be a useful idiot than just a plain stupid idiot.

I've said the case is weak and shouldn't be brought. Maybe you missed the several times I have said that. But the FACT that you cannot find yourself even trying to refute is that there is a difference between this and Clinton. Unless Clinton falsified business records these charges COULD NOT be brought against her. Not possible. Falsifying business records requires a business and records.

Clinton should never have been a nominee. Biden shouldn't have ever been a nominee. Trump never should have been a nominee. I'm not defending Clinton from being a terrible candidate. But the question was, "Why wasn't Hillary charged" and the answer is that these charges involve business records therefore she couldn't be charged with these charges.

 

[dbmhoosier]

Yes.

 

[mushroomgod_1]

I guess it is better to be a useful idiot than just a plain stupid idiot.

I've said the case is weak and shouldn't be brought. Maybe you missed the several times I have said that. But the FACT that you cannot find yourself even trying to refute is that there is a difference between this and Clinton. Unless Clinton falsified business records these charges COULD NOT be brought against her. Not possible. Falsifying business records requires a business and records.

Clinton should never have been a nominee. Biden shouldn't have ever been a nominee. Trump never should have been a nominee. I'm not defending Clinton from being a terrible candidate. But the question was, "Why wasn't Hillary charged" and the answer is that these charges involve business records therefore she couldn't be charged with these char

But the fact that this particular crime could not be charged against HC is of no significance whatsoever. Because the alleged "crime" is of no significance, and would never have been charged against any individual other than Trump. Had Joe Biden, or one of his lackeys , invited prosecutors from the various jurisdictions relating to Clinton, state and federal, to the WH to coordinate the pursuit of criminal chares against HC, there could have been an equal # filed against her. Relating to true fing fraudulent conspiratorial election interference, and intentional destruction of government data, among other matters. But its not really about Trump and Clinton. That's a sideshow.. The coordinated weaponization of the judicial system against the political opposition, in a manner unprecedented in US history, is the story here. Meanwhile, you bloviate about nonsense. Good for you, if that's what you're into. But its all just noise.

 

[BCCHoosier]

Verdict is in.

 

[Ohio Guy]

You have no right to speak. None, you need drop kicked in your (choose a body part and use female genitalia). Fact checkers? Ohhh you mean those paid idiots that parrot left furry food for furries like you. Go stand in the corner kevin, ken, klaus whatever your pronoun is today.

He's already, in two posts in 24 hours using twitter (the guy driving the car with the suspended license, the cali progressive rep that woke up) provided more value to this board than you ever can hope to. Enlighten us with your trump hate this morning and laugh about the latest the girl getting raped is about all you're good for.

You're WAY out of line here. Especially your last sentence.

 

[Marvin the Martian]

But the fact that this particular crime could not be charged against HC is of no significance whatsoever. Because the alleged "crime" is of no significance, and would never have been charged against any individual other than Trump. Had Joe Biden, or one of his lackeys , invited prosecutors from the various jurisdictions relating to Clinton, state and federal, to the WH to coordinate the pursuit of criminal chares against HC, there could have been an equal # filed against her. Relating to true fing fraudulent conspiratorial election interference, and intentional destruction of government data, among other matters. But its not really about Trump and Clinton. That's a sideshow.. The coordinated weaponization of the judicial system against the political opposition, in a manner unprecedented in US history, is the story here. Meanwhile, you bloviate about nonsense. Good for you, if that's what you're into. But its all just noise.

Biden should have tried calling other countries and threaten to withhold aid unless they charged Trump. We know it has been decided that isn't a serious offense.

 

[T.M.P.]

You're WAY out of line here. Especially your last sentence.

Whack job ...

 

[Ohio Guy]

Whack job ...

We've had our fair share of morons who post some pretty stupid and dumb stuff, but he really takes the cake. Ad hominem attacks are one thing, but I honestly think he's too stupid to realize he took it way too far.

Probably needs an extended time out. It's clear that something about today short circuited some of the few neurons he had firing.

 

[mcmurtry66]

I guess it is better to be a useful idiot than just a plain stupid idiot.

I've said the case is weak and shouldn't be brought. Maybe you missed the several times I have said that. But the FACT that you cannot find yourself even trying to refute is that there is a difference between this and Clinton. Unless Clinton falsified business records these charges COULD NOT be brought against her. Not possible. Falsifying business records requires a business and records.

Clinton should never have been a nominee. Biden shouldn't have ever been a nominee. Trump never should have been a nominee. I'm not defending Clinton from being a terrible candidate. But the question was, "Why wasn't Hillary charged" and the answer is that these charges involve business records therefore she couldn't be charged with these charges.

@stollcpa @UncleMark

can you do something here with unhinged marv and the name calling etc. hate to see this thread go to shit

 

[cosmickid]

You're WAY out of line here. Especially your last sentence.

Can we get real here for a few seconds...

All the folks saying tis is a phony charge got me curious. So I went back to the DOJ (Trump's DOJ) and what they had to say (if anything) regarding the hush money payments...

This is 2018, and the release from the DOJ regarding Cohen who plead guilty and was sentenced to PRISON...

"According to the allegations in Information 18 Cr. 602 (WHP), filed by the United States States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (the “Office”), as well as previous court filings and statements in public court proceedings:

Between 2012 and 2016, COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the Internal Revenue Service, avoiding more than $1.3 million in income tax. COHEN also made false statements to a federally insured financial institution to obtain a $500,000 home equity loan. Finally, in 2016, COHEN made or caused two separate payments to women to ensure that they did not publicly disclose their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate in advance of the election. In one instance, COHEN caused American Media, Inc. (“AMI”), which was identified in previous court filings as “Corporation-1,” to make a $150,000 payment to one woman; in the other, COHEN made a $130,000 payment to another woman through an LLC he incorporated for the purpose of making the payment. COHEN was reimbursed for the latter payment in monthly installments disguised as payments for legal services performed pursuant to a retainer, when in fact no such retainer existed. COHEN made or caused both of these payments in order to influence the 2016 election and did so in coordination with one or more members of the campaign.

In addition to the sentence of imprisonment, Judge Pauley also ordered COHEN, 52, of New York, New York, to pay a fine of $50,000, to forfeit $500,000, to pay $1,393,858 in restitution to the IRS, and to pay a mandatory $800 special assessment. Separately, COHEN was ordered to pay a $50,000 fine and to pay a $100 special assessment in the case brought by the SCO. COHEN was also sentenced to concurrent three-year terms of supervised release in both cases, to follow his term of imprisonment."

So Trump's own DOJ in 2018 in charging Cohen said that Cohen was reimbursed for monthly payments DISGUISED as payments for legal services".

In other words, the DOJ in 2018 basically laid out the entire case that Trump has just been found guilty of. The only way you can think Trump was "innocent" is to basically claim that Trump knew nothing about the conspiracy that Cohen plead guilty to and went to prison for...

 

[UncleMark]

@stollcpa @UncleMark

can you do something here with unhinged marv and the name calling etc. hate to see this thread go to shit

It's being dealt with.

 

[Ohio Guy]

Can we get real here for a few seconds...

All the folks saying tis is a phony charge got me curious. So I went back to the DOJ (Trump's DOJ) and what they had to say (if anything) regarding the hush money payments...

This is 2018, and the release from the DOJ regarding Cohen who plead guilty and was sentenced to PRISON...

"According to the allegations in Information 18 Cr. 602 (WHP), filed by the United States States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (the “Office”), as well as previous court filings and statements in public court proceedings:

Between 2012 and 2016, COHEN concealed more than $4 million in personal income from the Internal Revenue Service, avoiding more than $1.3 million in income tax. COHEN also made false statements to a federally insured financial institution to obtain a $500,000 home equity loan. Finally, in 2016, COHEN made or caused two separate payments to women to ensure that they did not publicly disclose their alleged affairs with a presidential candidate in advance of the election. In one instance, COHEN caused American Media, Inc. (“AMI”), which was identified in previous court filings as “Corporation-1,” to make a $150,000 payment to one woman; in the other, COHEN made a $130,000 payment to another woman through an LLC he incorporated for the purpose of making the payment. COHEN was reimbursed for the latter payment in monthly installments disguised as payments for legal services performed pursuant to a retainer, when in fact no such retainer existed. COHEN made or caused both of these payments in order to influence the 2016 election and did so in coordination with one or more members of the campaign.

In addition to the sentence of imprisonment, Judge Pauley also ordered COHEN, 52, of New York, New York, to pay a fine of $50,000, to forfeit $500,000, to pay $1,393,858 in restitution to the IRS, and to pay a mandatory $800 special assessment. Separately, COHEN was ordered to pay a $50,000 fine and to pay a $100 special assessment in the case brought by the SCO. COHEN was also sentenced to concurrent three-year terms of supervised release in both cases, to follow his term of imprisonment."

So Trump's own DOJ in 2018 in charging Cohen said that Cohen was reimbursed for monthly payments DISGUISED as payments for legal services".

In other words, the DOJ in 2018 basically laid out the entire case that Trump has just been found guilty of. The only way you can think Trump was "innocent" is to basically claim that Trump knew nothing about the conspiracy that Cohen plead guilty to and went to prison for...

Wow - this is great, thanks for digging this up and posting it.

 

[Marvin the Martian]

@stollcpa @UncleMark

can you do something here with unhinged marv and the name calling etc. hate to see this thread go to shit

Hey, I didn't call anyone a soccer fan...

 

[zeke4ahs]

So McCarthy, Wisenberg, and a former SCOTUS clerk don't know what they're talking about and aren't reputable? Watch the first 14 minutes here and tell me how this trial is remotely legitimate. You can't.

View embedded media

I knew you’d be rapidly looking up sources to tell us it’s a sham. Do you truly not understand we can find a million sources that say it is legitimate?

 

[zeke4ahs]

It's not meaningless; in fact, it's likely the only shot demented Joe has at winning.

His brain (ie.. his handlers) knows that he only has to change 2 to 3% of the vote to when the election. So it matters little that 97-98% of the voters know this is all horseshit. There is very little that the sick bastard won't do to stay in power.

Well, he hasn’t tried an insurrection yet, has he? There is still that. The fact you can post that with no sense of irony is amusing.

 

[zeke4ahs]

Unless there is an actual recording, I can't give this much credibility. If there is a recording of him using the N word in that manner it won't matter one iota to any of the hard core Trumpsters here, but it might be the thing that loses Trump enough of the black vote to destroy any chance he has of winning.

Multiple people who worked there have said it for years. Supposedly there is a recording now. We’ll see.

 

[zeke4ahs]

But the fact that this particular crime could not be charged against HC is of no significance whatsoever. Because the alleged "crime" is of no significance, and would never have been charged against any individual other than Trump. Had Joe Biden, or one of his lackeys , invited prosecutors from the various jurisdictions relating to Clinton, state and federal, to the WH to coordinate the pursuit of criminal chares against HC, there could have been an equal # filed against her. Relating to true fing fraudulent conspiratorial election interference, and intentional destruction of government data, among other matters. But its not really about Trump and Clinton. That's a sideshow.. The coordinated weaponization of the judicial system against the political opposition, in a manner unprecedented in US history, is the story here. Meanwhile, you bloviate about nonsense. Good for you, if that's what you're into. But its all just noise.

Read the room

 

[anon_mya1phvcpf5x4]

You have no right to speak. None, you need drop kicked in your (choose a body part and use female genitalia). Fact checkers? Ohhh you mean those paid idiots that parrot left furry food for furries like you. Go stand in the corner kevin, ken, klaus whatever your pronoun is today.

He's already, in two posts in 24 hours using twitter (the guy driving the car with the suspended license, the cali progressive rep that woke up) provided more value to this board than you ever can hope to. Enlighten us with your trump hate this morning and laugh about the latest the girl getting raped is about all you're good for.

Nope. Just laugh at idiotic posts from partisan hacks like yourself.

 

[anon_mya1phvcpf5x4]

You're WAY out of line here. Especially your last sentence.

Way out of line should be his middle name.

 

[Stuffshot]

NYuck Nyuck Nyuck

Hey Moe!

 

[stollcpa]

When quoting a source that has had many of it's claims labeled as false from fact checkers, it kind of makes it hard to give the benefit of the doubt on the next claim without other sources corroborating the story.

Kind of like if the prosecution only had Cohen as a witness and nothing else to back him up. Probably the reason they made sure to have a lot more than just Cohen saying so.

And dbm's sources (mostly twitter apparently) are batting a ridiculously low percentage when it comes to being factual.

Fact checkers LOL. Anyone can call themselves a fact checker.

 

[anon_mya1phvcpf5x4]

Fact checkers LOL. Anyone can call themselves a fact checker.

Yea and usually they have an article with their reasoning and evidence. More than just links to Twitter twits

 

[Hoosier_Phenom]

Anytime someone posts a response like this they're demonstrating how astonishingly stupid they are.

Whether you agree with the prosecution or not, whether you like what's happening or not, a former president of the United States is on trial in criminal court for the first time in history. It's a big news story despite the fact that you, for whatever reason, would rather ignore it.

It’s a mockery of the judicial system. The sorry ass corrupt judge and DA which stands for Dumb Asshole have not proved a dam thing but he still gets found guilty. Those two should be disbarred and never allowed to try a court case again. New York is a shit hole.

 

[Hoosier_Phenom]

Multiple people who worked there have said it for years. Supposedly there is a recording now. We’ll see.

Really! I find it funny all the liberal assholes that believe everything they see posted. Keep drinking the kool aid idiot leftist scum.