ADVERTISEMENT

So have you seen the Gillette ad

I have no problems to calling out bad parenting no matter the gender, religion, race, political affiliation, or favorite sports team.

So it is bad parenting not to break up two boys who are wrestling around? You have no context that would say they were in a fight in that ad, it looked like the guy breaking up play.

Hey ladies, if you allow your daughter to play dress up, play with your makeup at a young age, and watch Princess shows, you are a shitty parent for telling her that her looks matter more than anything else. Stop toxic femininity. Do better....oh and buy Dove Soap while you are at it.
 
Because you aren’t talking about gender hate and racism. You’re all up in your feels about a commercial you don’t like. The epitome of emotional.

Yeah I don’t like the ad. I don’t like many advertisements. Perhaps that is an emotional reaction. I think it’s more of a reaction to an ad that tries to manipulate my emotions. What do you think of that Simpli-Safe ad that depicts a withdrawn scared woman after her home is ransacked? That’s also a terrible ad that reinforces woman stereotypes, a stereotype that you also often reinforce. I just don’t think stereotyping serves a constructive purpose because it’s designed to play on emotion. I don’t like those SPCA doggie ads for the same reason. In this case its more harmful because it needlessly scrapes the scab off of some important social issues with quick emotional images and sound bites. There are better ways.
 
Question: When you guys see an ad for Viagra, do you get all bent out of shape and whiny that it is stereotyping you all as unable to get it up?

No because the women in those ads are hot to trot. The ad is aimed at you, not me. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: stollcpa
Whatever happened to a boy or girl just being themselves?

After all, not all boys and girls are alike
Furthermore both are human beings with a great deal in common. Why is it we play up the differences?
 
So it is bad parenting not to break up two boys who are wrestling around? You have no context that would say they were in a fight in that ad, it looked like the guy breaking up play.

Hey ladies, if you allow your daughter to play dress up, play with your makeup at a young age, and watch Princess shows, you are a shitty parent for telling her that her looks matter more than anything else. Stop toxic femininity. Do better....oh and buy Dove Soap while you are at it.

I don't know what it is in that fight, it might be play but then it might be play they were told not to engage in.

By coincidence the American Psychological Association issued a new report on boys and men this week. The Chief of Professional Practice for the APA said:

"I was very impressed by [the ad]," says Skillings. "I thought that not only did it highlight some of the positive traits about masculinity, for example that men can be competitive playing sports or could enjoy barbecuing and enjoying company with other men, but it also highlighted the ways in which this traditional, or toxic, masculinity has harmed other people, including women, and in some ways, men themselves."​
 
BS! The ad stereotyps men and boys as being bullies and abusers.
The ad criticizes toxic masculinity--it criticizes the purveyors of that toxic culture and asks men to model non-toxic masculinity and to, instead, stand up against bullying and abuse. The right sees this as an attack on men and masculinity. Takeaway: bullying, abuse and toxic masculinity are central to what the right regards as being male.
 
Isn't it better when kids just fight it out anyway?

I hope when my kids get into disagreements it will be settled in the park, down the block, after school. The better man wins, argument resolved. In the end there is always someone who can kick your ass, bullies hit their ceiling eventually.

Why do teachers and parents need to be brought into it at all? It's a product of those who prefer a nanny state and feel the need to run to higher authorities to resolve even the smallest disagreements.

Bullies are easy to deal with, but raising a tattle tale? ......... well then you've just failed as a parent.
 
The ad criticizes toxic masculinity--it criticizes the purveyors of that toxic culture and asks men to model non-toxic masculinity and to, instead, stand up against bullying and abuse. The right sees this as an attack on men and masculinity. Takeaway: bullying, abuse and toxic masculinity are central to what the right regards as being male.

I’ve got no problem with ads asking people to do the right thing. And I think there is a lot of bad male behavior. There are reasons why more males are in prison than females. But that isn’t toxic masculinity. TM strikes me as a trendy woke expression to normalize general bashing. I’m against that.
 
It may be accurate, but I've known a lot of people (male and female to be honest) who ascribe very
Just another perfect example of a guy that absolutely doesn’t get it and likely never will.( author, not you) Let me know when there are an astronomical number of men sexually harassed, abused, killed by domestic violence, stalked, on and on and on. Girls absolutely do bully and can be extremely mean to each other. And it’s something that is addressed and depicted often . Just can’t imagine why anyone could possibly be offended by this . I’d be thrilled with more ads encouraging young girls to be kinder and better people.
So you wouldn’t be offended if they made an ad like this about women?
I said in another post, that they have made ads like that aimed at young girls and bullying. Some public service. But no, I wouldn’t be mad at all. I’d welcome it.
 
And there we have part of the problem... Dad tells me to hit someone saying bad things to me. He may consider that standing up for himself. Schools consider that suspension.

LOL at caring what schools think. I got suspended several times and turned out just fine.

And who said anything about the kid just getting verbally abused? You are just making up scenarios to fit your feminine narrative.
Lol at NOT caring what schools think. Want to check suspension/ drop out rates and put them up against incarceration numbers, etc? Where do you think it starts? Oh forgot. Because you got suspended and turned out ok , that’s evidence that everyone else does too. And when I was discussing fights at schools I said parents came in saying they told kids they could hit if someone was reading them. Feminine narrative? Lol. How about teacher narrative? Saw it, lived it narrative?
 
I’ve got no problem with ads asking people to do the right thing. And I think there is a lot of bad male behavior. There are reasons why more males are in prison than females. But that isn’t toxic masculinity. TM strikes me as a trendy woke expression to normalize general bashing. I’m against that.
The ad only focuses on bullying and abuse...and only asks people to do the right thing. Lots of guys are in prison precisely because they abuse others in a criminal fashion.
 
Isn't it better when kids just fight it out anyway?

I hope when my kids get into disagreements it will be settled in the park, down the block, after school. The better man wins, argument resolved. In the end there is always someone who can kick your ass, bullies hit their ceiling eventually.

Why do teachers and parents need to be brought into it at all? It's a product of those who prefer a nanny state and feel the need to run to higher authorities to resolve even the smallest disagreements.

Bullies are easy to deal with, but raising a tattle tale? ......... well then you've just failed as a parent.
There you go. Toxic masculinity in a nutshell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrHoops
The ad criticizes toxic masculinity--it criticizes the purveyors of that toxic culture and asks men to model non-toxic masculinity and to, instead, stand up against bullying and abuse. The right sees this as an attack on men and masculinity. Takeaway: bullying, abuse and toxic masculinity are central to what the right regards as being male.
This reminds me of the back and forth on "extremist Islam." I didn't agree that psychotic behavior equates to any form of Islam and I don't agree that cowardice equates to any form of masculinity. Men aren't cowards.
 
That is drawing cheers, criticism , and threatens of boycotts? https://www.apnews.com/752f3d102a8142d98106ceb22139200b
Are there bad guys out there? Sure. But it's not the fault of being masculine. Gillette better be careful because people don't like to be lectured to, and they are getting close to the line that the football players did by kneeling, protesting their own country during the national anthem. Now that the kneeling has stopped ratings for the NFL are coming back. Who'd of thunk it? Stop putting people down and they might become good customers again.
As far as why men do what they do as far as their disrespect of women I don't blame masculinity. I blame the lack of male figures in many of the lives of boys as they are growing up. Where did we learn to treat women like ladies? We learned it from our dads. Every day we would see the way our dads treat our mothers and we as boys learned without them really sitting us down and talking to us about it. We learned because of the daily example. If boys don't have that then they might turn out to be grown up boys instead of men.
There is another factor in my view. The access to pornography has warped many of our males. They think they can treat women the way they want, ogle, talk about their body features, and disrespect them. Shelly Lubben, former adult actress has become a hero of mine. She has embraced Jesus as her Savior and tries to get girls out of that industry. One time she said that as men look at more and more pornography they will desire and even demand harsher kinds. They will want to see porn where women are humiliated. What actually happens is they don't have respect for women and they begin to somewhat hate them. How did they get there? Perhaps they didn't have Dads who taught them right or they were grabbed by the pornography industry as a young boy and their souls belong to them. Let's not blame masculinity. Let's embrace true masculinity which respects women and treats them right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoot1
Hate to break it to you. But that’s not a real phrase.
Hate to break it to you but not only is the phrase real so is the phenomena it describes. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/16/sci...ssage-of-gillettes-toxic-masculinity-ad-.html
I think this has been discussed in links above. Here is another that links back to the APA.
research supports the idea that “toxic masculinity” is, in fact, detrimental to the mental and physical health of boys and men.

Just days before the release of the ad, the American Psychological Association (APA) issued new “Guidelines for the Psychological Practice with Boys and Men.” The new guidelines highlight the unique physical and mental health risks that boys and men face, including higher rates of completed suicide, violence, substance abuse, cardiovascular problems and early mortality. They also issue a warning against conforming to traditional stereotypes of masculinity, citing years of research that links machismo to the aforementioned health risks.

“We didn’t coordinate with [Gillette],” Jared L. Skillings, Ph.D., Chief of Professional Practice for the APA tells CNBC Make It. “The timing of this is coincidental, although, nicely so.

The report states:

“Socialization for conforming to traditional masculinity ideology has been shown to limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict (Pleck, 1981, 1995; O’Neil, 2008; O’Neil & Renzulli, 2013), and negatively influence mental health (e.g., O’Neil, 2008, 2013, 2015) and physical health (Courtenay, 2011; Gough & Robertson, 2017). Indeed, boys and men are overrepresented in a variety of psychological and social problems.”
 
So if you’ve kept up on this thread, has that changed your mind?

not a bit. because the video isn't controversial. (as you noticed also).

but if the video itself isn't controversial enough, no problem.

just make the comments controversial instead, and away we go.



fact is, it's probably intentionally less controversial/graphic than it would need to be, to really make the point it's trying to make.

young kids can wrestle on the ground without it being bullying. a boss can state, "what i think she's actually trying to say" without being condescending or being sexually discriminatory, and guys can try to strike up a conversation with a girl without being sexual predators.

that said, actual bullying does go on, bosses can be bullies too, (i've seen far more bullying in the workplace than on the playground), and guys can be predatory towards women.

i just think the ad was targeted at all ages so needed to be "family friendly", thus avoided showing older kids actually beating or threatening to beat someone, a boss actually being condescending or sexist, and guys actually being sexually predatory, as the point of the ad was to promote awareness that these things go on and shouldn't, rather than graphically and realistically depicting them.

as for all the over the top reactions, no doubt some of those are from total idiots who can't grasp that the video was understated for family viewing, but more so, from the social media armies whose goal is to promote keeping everyone fighting amongst themselves, so as to keep them away from concentrating on the real issues of importance.

the sock puppets that dominate this and other social media have no interest what so ever in discussing the real non partisan issues that permeate both parties, and are the real threat.

their interest and agenda is to promote one party as good, and the other as bad.

or one parties voters as good, and the other parties voters as bad. (thanks Rush).

i could start a thread on how money has taken over both parties, thus govt and the regulatory side in general, and it wouldn't get 2 replies other than a couple personal attacks on me for even bring up the subject. as virtually no one here wants to discuss anything afflicting both parties or govt in general.

but if i just said Republicans are sell outs, or Democrats are sell outs, or Obama is corrupt, or Trump is corrupt, there would be 5 pages of replies in no time..

being party or ideology centric is the key.

promoting "us vs them" is what most are here for, not intellectual discourse on things of much greater importance.

and the reason they are pitching "us vs them" so hard, is to keep everyone fighting each other, rather than fighting the real malevolent force that's captured both parties and govt in general..
 
Last edited:
Hate to break it to you but not only is the phrase real so is the phenomena it describes. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/16/sci...ssage-of-gillettes-toxic-masculinity-ad-.html
I think this has been discussed in links above. Here is another that links back to the APA.
research supports the idea that “toxic masculinity” is, in fact, detrimental to the mental and physical health of boys and men.

Just days before the release of the ad, the American Psychological Association (APA) issued new “Guidelines for the Psychological Practice with Boys and Men.” The new guidelines highlight the unique physical and mental health risks that boys and men face, including higher rates of completed suicide, violence, substance abuse, cardiovascular problems and early mortality. They also issue a warning against conforming to traditional stereotypes of masculinity, citing years of research that links machismo to the aforementioned health risks.

“We didn’t coordinate with [Gillette],” Jared L. Skillings, Ph.D., Chief of Professional Practice for the APA tells CNBC Make It. “The timing of this is coincidental, although, nicely so.

The report states:

“Socialization for conforming to traditional masculinity ideology has been shown to limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict (Pleck, 1981, 1995; O’Neil, 2008; O’Neil & Renzulli, 2013), and negatively influence mental health (e.g., O’Neil, 2008, 2013, 2015) and physical health (Courtenay, 2011; Gough & Robertson, 2017). Indeed, boys and men are overrepresented in a variety of psychological and social problems.”

So you're counter is CNBC justifying their made up phrase by referencing a study from the APA that doesn't include the phrase "Toxic Masculinity" anywhere.

And why exactly am I supposed to lend credence to a bunch of worthless psychologists who banded together to form an organization in the hope that people would find them credible?

Did you do one ounce of research into the APA, or do you just assume acronym = credibility?

First line on their wikipedia page

"The APA has task forces that issue policy statements on various matters of social importance, including abortion, human rights, the welfare of detainees, human trafficking, the rights of the mentally ill, IQtesting, sexual orientation change efforts, and gender equality"

Oh yeah that doesn't sound like a political organization at all......

:rolleyes:
 
So you're counter is CNBC justifying their made up phrase by referencing a study from the APA that doesn't include the phrase "Toxic Masculinity" anywhere.

And why exactly am I supposed to lend credence to a bunch of worthless psychologists who banded together to form an organization in the hope that people would find them credible?

Did you do one ounce of research into the APA, or do you just assume acronym = credibility?

First line on their wikipedia page

"The APA has task forces that issue policy statements on various matters of social importance, including abortion, human rights, the welfare of detainees, human trafficking, the rights of the mentally ill, IQtesting, sexual orientation change efforts, and gender equality"

Oh yeah that doesn't sound like a political organization at all......

:rolleyes:

I suspect the Baptist Church issues statements on most of those, are they political?
 
Did I reference Baptist church positions as if they lend some sort of credibility to my argument?
Nope, just asking if having issued statements automatically makes a body political? Because if so, I doubt there is an apolitical organization in the US. If not, what make psychologists different from Baptists?
 
Nope, just asking if having issued statements automatically makes a body political? Because if so, I doubt there is an apolitical organization in the US. If not, what make psychologists different from Baptists?

What about organizations that form tasks forces to issue statements on the most politically charged social issues they can find. Is that organization still apolitical?

I guess your right. I don't know exactly what the APA's stance is on those issues.

I could hazard a guess though....
 
My boys want to wrestle and play fight.

What's "play fight"?

IMHO, you can't control emotions. You can only control how you react to them. The ad I saw didn't challenge the way men feel. It challenged us to have a higher standard for how men act. I'm fascinated by the complaints I hear about society from some of my conservative brethren out of one side of their mouth and the complaints I hear from some of those same conservative brethren when similar complaints come from a different perspective.
 
What about 99% of corporations and 99% of public sector employers?

I don't often see them publishing stances on abortion and sexual orientation change.

It seems only pseudo intellectuals/ scientists feel the need to do that.

By the way, it seems P&G just issued a position on toxic masculinity. Nike issued a position on kneeling a couple months ago. Remember RFRA? Cummins, Lilly, Salesforce, and others issued positions then.
 
It may be accurate, but I've known a lot of people (male and female to be honest) who ascribe very seriously to "boys will be boys" for all sorts of behaviors. So while a lot of people may not sit by and watch two boys " beat the shit out of each other", I've seen it. Heck, that pretty much sums up my father's attitude.

I would be curious about Aloha's experiences. My theory is growing up on the wrong side of the tracks makes this sort of parenting more likely. Added on Edit, I don't necessarily mean it makes one more likely to parent that way when they get older, as I sure was much different than my dad. But in my neighborhood we were almost expected to get into fights.
If you're talking about rough housing and typical, at least at the time I think, boy stuff - yeah I did a lot of it. I don't know how much different my experiences are from other guys, but I'd guess they're a lot different than many. Especially the younger guys here. Until the summer after second grade, when my parents divorced, I lived out in the country. I had a lot of friends my age and we wrestled, fought and all that. I wrestled and fought with my best two friends more than anyone else. Usually, we did it for fun, but there were times it went a little far and we'd get mad and really fight. One of us would "give" and then we went back to being friends. I learned a lot about fighting that helped later on. I was also taught never to look for a fight, never hit girls, protect girls if other guys were trying to hit them, and if a fight was going to happen you defend yourself and try to end it quickly. I did very well in school, but I did spend my share of time in the corner for overly rambunctious behavior with my friends on the playground. We'd also spend almost all day outside playing baseball, football, whatever. It was a lot of fun.

After that we moved to the "city" and I sort of kept the same set of rules though it was rough for the new kid for a while as we lived in the roughest part of town for a few years. I never started a fight and tried to avoid them, but I had plenty of them. Sometimes you just can't avoid them. I had to protect my little sister (two years younger) and my female cousin too. I also learned how to get along with people of all backgrounds. Don't need or want to tell the whole story, but it turned out alright. To be honest, I'm grateful for all of it. It was a good experience overall and prepared me in many ways for what I've done with my life since then.

My daughter has lived a life of privilege in comparison, and that's what I wanted for her. She also knows it, because I've shown her the places I lived and the neighborhoods my schools were located. She has quite a bit more gratitude for how her life was - and is. ;)
 
That's maybe the most condescending ad towards a marketers (supposed) target market that I could imagine being made. "Basically you are shitty people and have been a long time, do better."

That's about a 180 from the Kapernick ad, IMO.... which had a very positive message towards their target market.
 
And in the Trump presidency, we’ve seen families separated, children in cages, a rise in hate crimes/white nationalism & the normalization of a whole range of abhorrent behaviors from the president.

The vast majority of the anti-Trump protest after/during inauguration were peaceful. Peaceful protest is as American as it gets. Get a whole bunch of people together, and you’ll always have a few a’holes that act out.
Something tells me that Trump didn't tease, roughhouse, or play tackle football. He grew up a spoiled little rich boy and still turned out a sexist bully.
 
If you're talking about rough housing and typical, at least at the time I think, boy stuff - yeah I did a lot of it. I don't know how much different my experiences are from other guys, but I'd guess they're a lot different than many. Especially the younger guys here. Until the summer after second grade, when my parents divorced, I lived out in the country. I had a lot of friends my age and we wrestled, fought and all that. I wrestled and fought with my best two friends more than anyone else. Usually, we did it for fun, but there were times it went a little far and we'd get mad and really fight. One of us would "give" and then we went back to being friends. I learned a lot about fighting that helped later on. I was also taught never to look for a fight, never hit girls, protect girls if other guys were trying to hit them, and if a fight was going to happen you defend yourself and try to end it quickly. I did very well in school, but I did spend my share of time in the corner for overly rambunctious behavior with my friends on the playground. We'd also spend almost all day outside playing baseball, football, whatever. It was a lot of fun.

After that we moved to the "city" and I sort of kept the same set of rules though it was rough for the new kid for a while as we lived in the roughest part of town for a few years. I never started a fight and tried to avoid them, but I had plenty of them. Sometimes you just can't avoid them. I had to protect my little sister (two years younger) and my female cousin too. I also learned how to get along with people of all backgrounds. Don't need or want to tell the whole story, but it turned out alright. To be honest, I'm grateful for all of it. It was a good experience overall and prepared me in many ways for what I've done with my life since then.

My daughter has lived a life of privilege in comparison, and that's what I wanted for her. She also knows it, because I've shown her the places I lived and the neighborhoods my schools were located. She has quite a bit more gratitude for how her life was - and is. ;)
In short, nothing about bullying.
 
I was taught not to do it and not to tolerate it. I didn't do it and I didn't tolerate it. Those are the more memorable fights.
...and your solution for all the bullying that goes on today, leading to suicides and all sorts of other unfortunate consequences is...? (this is a discussion forum, so let's hear it)
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT