There are now sound analysis being conducted, and there are a few of the shots that have totally different sound signature than the first 4-5. Also extremely different than the shot from the "identified" sniper that allegedly shot Crooks.
There are now sound analysis being conducted, and there are a few of the shots that have totally different sound signature than the first 4-5. Also extremely different than the shot from the "identified" sniper that allegedly shot Crooks.
The further we go out, the deeper the water gets.
What did I post that was getting silly?Let's not get silly. This guy breaks down everything in detail.
Thread by @OAlexanderDK on Thread Reader App
@OAlexanderDK: 🧵Analysis of footage from the Trump assassination attempt shows that Trump and David Dutch were hit in Crook's initial 3 shot volley. Corey Comperatore and James Copenhaver were struck by Crook's foll...…threadreaderapp.com
What did I post that was getting silly?
There actually is sound analysis that have recorded different sound signatures.
This could be the difference in store bought ammo (every precise shooter knows that mass quantity rounds are not equal).
This could be a different gun
This could be a different location
This could be, WTF knows? but it is recorded and it is being investigated.
Nothing is off the table, until it is proven to not have a place at the table. We are in the public, and offical. investigation phase.
If the recent history of the ABC swamp hold true, there will be more gleaned from the water cooler questioning, than all of what is declassified and published to us poor serfs.
That part, you can take to the effing bank !
I thought a 130 yard shot was a layup? And the counter sniper had optics.
A Doc Holiday gif would have been better. Huckleberry.
Have we heard from @outside shooter lately? Wink.
@swman 😀Have we heard from @outside shooter lately? Wink.
Florida man arrested for 'written threats to kill' Trump, Vance days after assassination attempt
A Florida man made "written threats to kill" former President Trump and Sen. JD Vance just days after the attempted assassination attempt on the former president.www.foxnews.com
So, the counter sniper obviously had Crooks in his sights prior to when the shooting started.Let's not get silly. This guy breaks down everything in detail.
Thread by @OAlexanderDK on Thread Reader App
@OAlexanderDK: 🧵Analysis of footage from the Trump assassination attempt shows that Trump and David Dutch were hit in Crook's initial 3 shot volley. Corey Comperatore and James Copenhaver were struck by Crook's foll...…threadreaderapp.com
As soon as they see a rifle I’d be shocked if their ROE doesn’t permit instant kinetic action.So, the counter sniper obviously had Crooks in his sights prior to when the shooting started.
Sorry if I missed it but what’s the official story on that? They knew he was there but couldn’t shoot until they knew for sure what he was up to?
I agree but the mere seconds between the first volley and the second volley which killed Crooks means they would have HAD to had him in their sights. No one finds a target as small as Crooks apparently was(one in a million shot) and kills him with one shot in that amount of time unless they were watching him.As soon as they see a rifle I’d be shocked if their ROE doesn’t permit instant kinetic action.
Didn’t they hear that there was a suspicious guy on the roof earlier? In the infantry we premark targets (usually when in a defense) for artillery / indirect fires before we actually attack. Then we call out the name of the target and send it.I agree but the mere seconds between the first volley and the second volley which killed Crooks means they would have HAD to had him in their sights. No one finds a target as small as Crooks apparently was(one in a million shot) and kills him with one shot in that amount of time unless they were watching him.
I agree but the mere seconds between the first volley and the second volley which killed Crooks means they would have HAD to had him in their sights. No one finds a target as small as Crooks apparently was(one in a million shot) and kills him with one shot in that amount of time unless they were watching him.
‘The weekend of the Butler shooting, the Secret Service had sent multiple countersniper teams and hundreds of agents to the Republican National Convention and was also securing an event by Jill Biden and a scheduled trip by President Biden to Austin the day after the shooting. “It’s just true - we don’t have the resources to secure him [Trump] like we did when he was president,” the official said.’Just want to let you know... I'm not ignoring you... In the past I've enjoyed most of what you post... My old phone won't allow me to access most of what you're linking these days, which is a shame because I'm certain it's both interesting and informative...
There are widely varying degrees of bullying within the “bullied” label. The same goes for “loner”. What’s that mean, he didn’t eat lunch at the cool guys’ table? Didn’t play pool on Friday nights nor join Glee Club?The kid's not talking. Who knows if he left a note. Who knows how much light the parents can shed on this. But you're right. Apparently he wasn't much for social media and not public about his ideology if, in fact, he had one.
We'll probably never understand what prompted him to do this.
An all-too-common pattern, though. Bullied. Loner.
‘The weekend of the Butler shooting, the Secret Service had sent multiple countersniper teams and hundreds of agents to the Republican National Convention and was also securing an event by Jill Biden and a scheduled trip by President Biden to Austin the day after the shooting. “It’s just true - we don’t have the resources to secure him [Trump] like we did when he was president,” the official said.’
Quote is from WaPo
‘The weekend of the Butler shooting, the Secret Service had sent multiple countersniper teams and hundreds of agents to the Republican National Convention and was also securing an event by Jill Biden and a scheduled trip by President Biden to Austin the day after the shooting. “It’s just true - we don’t have the resources to secure him [Trump] like we did when he was president,” the official said.’
Quote is from WaPo
They purposely left your boy out like a sitting duck. Doesn’t matter though, they still couldn’t take him out. It’s going to be a great fall.It's so real, sad, disgusting, and almost unbelievable. They needed an army of @Joe_Hoopsier and instead they were given a bunch of Zeke's. 😡😡😡
A good man was killed. 😪They purposely left your boy out like a sitting duck. Doesn’t matter though, they still couldn’t take him out. It’s going to be a great fall.
Unfortunately, that’s what can happen when you have incompetent people in places they shouldn’t be in.
They purposely left your boy out like a sitting duck. Doesn’t matter though, they still couldn’t take him out. It’s going to be a great fall.
Problem is the stakes just got even higher... The pros (bad guy pros) have seen the Secret Service in action and not only are they not intimidated, (which used to be the best thing the Secr. Serv. had going for it), they're bound to be encouraged...
The Iranian Quods Force, ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Chinese, the Drug Cartels, MS13 and similar gangs, businesses whose Trumps policies are threatening to blow up future big money deals, Illegal Immigrant Criminals and brain washed morons who truly believe he's an "existential threat to democracy", plus the lone nut are now All very serious threats from here on out...
Once again, it's my opinion that if Trump and the RNC are smart they'll contract with a pro protection company (or two) and plug them into the Secret Service protection augmentation (on the perimeter) in both the intelligence collection mode and the day to day protection mode...
I wouldn't trust Mayorkas in any way, shape, or form to provide adequate protection resources, at best he doesn't care what might happen to Trump, at worst he might be compromised (by the Cartels)... I say that only because no one can be as bad at their job as he is unless it's a purposeful effort...
The head of the Secret Service strikes me as just a Mayorkas lackey who evidently isn't anywhere near as sharp as her resume' would suggest (based on that Ridiculously stupid Lie about the roof being too steep to place her Snipers on)...
My wife played a detailed analysis for me. I upset her at the start, laughing about it. After listening to the entire thing I quit laughing. I don’t know enough about the subject to know if I heard what I heard. Based on sound, there were definitely three distinctly different sounds from the shots. Maybe there’s an explanation for the shooters shots sounding differently?There are now sound analysis being conducted, and there are a few of the shots that have totally different sound signature than the first 4-5. Also extremely different than the shot from the "identified" sniper that allegedly shot Crooks.
The further we go out, the deeper the water gets.
I thought a 130 yard shot was a layup? And the counter sniper had optics.
How is that 'one in a million'?