ADVERTISEMENT

Palisades fire

I'm not saying anything.

I'm just pointing out that some of the cuts were to one time purchase items, civil positions that were already vacant and firefighters got a raise that wasn't in the budget in time to be confirmed.
OK. And it’s important to have all the relevant information.

I just don’t think this really refutes the crux of Crowley’s complaint. Having budget cuts doesn’t necessarily mean that the department’s budget as a whole went down. What the chief has been saying is that they’ve been deprived of critical resources that they’ve been begging for.

Whether or not those resources would be making a significant difference in outcomes here, I have no idea. Maybe they wouldn’t. But it still seems to me that LA is institutionally unprepared not only to reduce the risk posed by these fires, but to minimize their destruction when/if they do happen.
 
I think we see a thousand year fire, to put it in flood terminology. We saw cities in Indiana hammered by a thousand year flood, Columbus hospital was flooded out in 2008 as an example. We struggle when the black swan occurs.

I agree there probably should have been more done, more water towers on hills would be the best answer. Even more pumps to pump up to them.

But we aren't going to ever spend the money to defeat the 1000 year problem in an area as large as Southern California. These winds gusting to 100 just is more than we can really adequately fight. We can prepare for X, but know that 2X is going to be a problem. We can handle another Mt St Helen's, Yellowstone blows and we are just screwed.
 
My bad, Brad. That was really directed at crazed, who didn't want to answer a direct question about it and just opine vaguely. Sorry for being grouchy about it. I knew your heart was in the right place on that.
I get it. It must be stressful to even be near that much devastation. And rather than just watch it and take it all in, my mind went to thinking of fixing it to avoid thinking about the bad stuff. Men, am I right? :)

Here’s a partial answer: the salt is corrosive to the machinery, dampens the firefighting effect of the water, carries a charge that might be dangerous to the firefighters, and will run off into groundwater afterwards, perhaps making it unusable.

 
OK. And it’s important to have all the relevant information.

I just don’t think this really refutes the crux of Crowley’s complaint. Having budget cuts doesn’t necessarily mean that the department’s budget as a whole went down. What the chief has been saying is that they’ve been deprived of critical resources that they’ve been begging for.

Whether or not those resources would be making a significant difference in outcomes here, I have no idea. Maybe they wouldn’t. But it still seems to me that LA is institutionally unprepared not only to reduce the risk posed by these fires, but to minimize their destruction when/if they do happen.

I'm sure there are things to certainly improve on, but I think 80+ miles an hour winds are something that no matter how much you prepare for, it's just game changing when it's all said and done.
 
I think we see a thousand year fire, to put it in flood terminology. We saw cities in Indiana hammered by a thousand year flood, Columbus hospital was flooded out in 2008 as an example. We struggle when the black swan occurs.

I agree there probably should have been more done, more water towers on hills would be the best answer. Even more pumps to pump up to them.

But we aren't going to ever spend the money to defeat the 1000 year problem in an area as large as Southern California. These winds gusting to 100 just is more than we can really adequately fight. We can prepare for X, but know that 2X is going to be a problem. We can handle another Mt St Helen's, Yellowstone blows and we are just screwed.
I get it. Start with simply accepting defeat, instead of building the infrastructure to start with. I wouldn't expect any differnt from 1)the swamp 2) California 3) the left (unless they have control of the voting machines program). Nothing to see here. Just accept your shit being burnt down.

Oh, we can't ever walk on the moon so don't try... ooops.
 
I get it. Start with simply accepting defeat, instead of building the infrastructure to start with. I wouldn't expect any differnt from 1)the swamp 2) California 3) the left (unless they have control of the voting machines program). Nothing to see here. Just accept your shit being burnt down.

Oh, we can't ever walk on the moon so don't try... ooops.

You must be talking about yourself. You know, one of those who pretends AGW doesn't exist because you don't want to be bothered to do anything to fight it. Get that fricking redwood out of your eye before discussing my mote.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Budget cuts have impacts? And here I thought there was all kinds of waste to be rooted out of government.

With all due respect, I don't think you have any clue about what Karen Bass is doing or not doing in Los Angeles and I don't see anything other than political hackery in your assessment.
It doesn’t matter where the cuts come from? Either no departments have waste or all do? Interesting take..🤔
 
You must be talking about yourself. You know, one of those who pretends AGW doesn't exist because you don't want to be bothered to do anything to fight it. Get that fricking redwood out of your eye before discussing my mote.
Accepting Self defeat is something that I don't aspire to accept.
There is an identified reason for failure. Go fix it! It's only impossible if one never tries. Cali has set a stake that they are ok with Billions of $$ of damage, without attempts to cure it, are ok. Lets trade Greenland for CAli! That whole mentality can go away and it won't be soon enough.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT