Dude I posted what neighbors, people living in the neighborhood said. How exactly can it be wrong, when people are discussing personal encounters they've had with the McCloskey's? Many of those people, who had lived in the neighborhood prior to the McCloskeys buying in, said that they (McCloskeys) tried to appropriate public land as their own and accused the neighbors who had been crossing it for years as trespassing...I also posted video from local St Louis tv stations- not sure what level of lunacy wants to label them as "worthless partisan sites"No. Every single thing you posted from your worthless partisan sites was wrong. You take it as gospel and it was all wrong. But you believe it; because it's congruent with your hyper partisan beliefs, despite those possessing personal knowledge telling you and showing you otherwise. The unpardonable sin is being the unrelenting political hypocrite that you are with your endless bot posts. Link, link. Link to stupid, partisan sites. You are a far left wingnut who has been co-opted by propaganda sites. Your hypocrisy in the truckers vis-à-vis BLM is typical.
The worst indictment for those clowns was that outsiders (who didn't know them) held them up as heroes and they spoke at the Trumper convention. Meanwhile, none of their neighbors had a single good thing to say about them. They live in a wealthy conclave- are any of their neighbors contributing to their Senate campaign or hosting fundraisers? If not, I'd say that's sort of telling of how their neighbors feel about them... Which was kind of always the main focus of my posts...
So I guess this won't count since the BBC is a "leftist rag", but here is the type of incidents I discussed...
"However, according to court documents and other media reports, the McCloskeys' residency on Portland Place has, at times, been contentious.
In a piece for the St Louis Post-Dispatch, investigative journalist Jeremy Kohler detailed a long list of alleged legal battles Mark McCloskey has waged against his neighbours, colleagues, and even his own father and sister, mostly over matters to do with property.
In one court filing, they are said to admit using a gun to force a fellow resident of Portland Place off a patch of grass they claimed to own because he "refused to heed the McCloskeys' warnings to stay off such property".
"According to Kohler's reporting, the McCloskeys also sued the trustees to enforce the neighbourhood rules that said only married couples could live there.
In one of the stranger reported conflicts, Kohler found the McCloskeys destroyed beehives along the outside of their northern wall, placed there by the neighbouring synagogue as a part of its children's programming. "The children were crying," the rabbi told Kohler."
Mark and Patricia McCloskey: What really went on in St Louis that day?
A US couple gained instant notoriety for waving guns at protesters. What really happened that day?
www.bbc.com