There are two problems here. First, people instinctively assume that those who harm them do so intentionally. This is an emotional reaction. If someone trips and hits us our initial reaction is often anger at the person for hitting us. Some people are capable of moderating that emotion with reason and recognizing when the blow was unintentional. Some aren't. The second problem is harder. Many people feel extreme emotional hatred directed at those who are, in fact, trying to harm them. Controlling those feelings is central to responding properly to such people--as anyone with military training knows. This is also the problem that many minorities have had to endure in pretty much every place and time. Think of Dr. King and the civil rights movement responding to those who quite literally meant to destroy them. This is also a problem for women who must often deal with people e.g., rapists and abusers who mean them harm.Of course it makes sense. Those are the hard core Trump supporters that see the Russia thing as mostly a trumped up sore loser attack by Democrats on the President they support. What it really shows is they can't stand those Democrats and would take Russia over those dastardly sore losers. Why did 22.6% of Democrats think it was "very likely" and another 28.2% say it's "somewhat likely" when asked this question in a 2006 poll:
"How likely is it that people in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East?"
In other words, more than half of Democrats believed that it was at least somewhat likely that people in our government either helped facilitate the most deadly terrorist attack in history or stood by while letting it happen. Democrats made up the large majority of 9/11 Truthers (it was a regular thing at Daily Kos) with John Conyers even holding mock hearings (unofficial, but at least some televised) allowing, among others, some of the 9/11 Truthers to air their ridiculous conspiracy theories. Waxman gave them some credibility they certainly did not deserve. That's all pretty disgraceful, isn't it? The fact is that I don't think they really believed what they claimed to believe so much as they were letting their extremely emotional hatred of President Bush do their thinking for them. It's something people do all to often. Including certain folks here.
Overall, the relatively powerless, are going to do better in terms of reacting to both situations by virtue of being forced to control their emotions while dealing with harms done by the indifference of the powerful and through the experience of being under actual attack. The relatively powerful much less so. The Republicans, as the party of the empowered, regularly screw this up more often than the Dems. But everyone is human.