ADVERTISEMENT

Mexico v Smith and Wesson

CO. Hoosier

Hall of Famer
Aug 29, 2001
48,127
26,538
113
Arguments today in Supreme Court.

In short: Mexico sued Smith and Wesson because of the horrendous amount of guns in the hands of the Cartels resulting in thousands and thousands of deaths.

Federal immunity law protects s&W. An exception is if S&W knowingly violates a law proximately related to the ultimate third party crime. Mexico says S&W knows it sells to gun runners. S&W says that’s not facially illegal.

For those of you who have been here awhile know I dislike the immunity law, as I do most all immunity laws. (I think they violate the 7th Amendment). Moreover, I think we need decent and effective gun control laws.

Oral arguments today and even the liberal justices were poking holes in Mexicos case.

Mexico is gonna lose. Nice try though.

Congress needs to fix this.

 
Arguments today in Supreme Court.

In short: Mexico sued Smith and Wesson because of the horrendous amount of guns in the hands of the Cartels resulting in thousands and thousands of deaths.

Federal immunity law protects s&W. An exception is if S&W knowingly violates a law proximately related to the ultimate third party crime. Mexico says S&W knows it sells to gun runners. S&W says that’s not facially illegal.

For those of you who have been here awhile know I dislike the immunity law, as I do most all immunity laws. (I think they violate the 7th Amendment). Moreover, I think we need decent and effective gun control laws.

Oral arguments today and even the liberal justices were poking holes in Mexicos case.

Mexico is gonna lose. Nice try though.

Congress needs to fix this.

Loser argument. The path to success is prescribed by tobacco. Advertising practices etc. seems the only viable path in these cases
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT