Mar-a-Lago is Under Siege
- Thread starter Lucy01
- Start date
He's just repeating the Fox Entertainment Propaganda narrative. That sound bite was repeated constantly the last two days ..
You guys keep mistaking his statements as thought, people like him don't think for themselves, he has no clue..
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Yes.
Every document relating to activities by the President and staff while on duty belongs to the American people. Every memo, every rough draft, every itinerary, every agenda, every post-it note, EVERYTHING. No exceptions. Full stop means nothing more to add: no exceptions, no additions, no addendum, no "yeah butts".
An archived document can be duplicated, only on request, for personal possession by the president or to display in the presidential library.
How is this hard for you?
Obviously a note passed to Stormy after hours about banging somewhere besides the oval office isn't official business. But if he's signing in porn stars for an oval office visit, that log is public property. Probably the type of crap he is trying to hide.
It's a commonly used phrase used to express that the statement preceding it is conclusive and there are no exceptions, addendums or interpretations of said statement.
All the cool kids have been using it since the telegraph was invented.
And you know the documents in question don't
or just making assumptions because it fits your narrative?
You're talking to a guy who refers to his wife as his "stoker."
I saw a clip of that too. It's ridiculous. What does it even mean? Because they're investigating Trump, they're just going to start investigating his followers en masse?
I'm actually kind of curious what @VanPastorMan thinks it means.
Here's the thing where I'll sort of agree with you. Most everyone doesn't actually know what documents the FBI was looking for and/or removed from Mar-a-lago. The only parties who actually know are the FBI, DOJ, and Trump and his lawyers.
All of those people have seen the warrant and the inventory list of what was actually taken during the raid. Trump and his legal team also have the added benefit of actually being able to take inventory of what was there before and after.
So with all that knowledge, what do you think Trump would do with it? If the past is any indication, he'd bold and highlight anything that MIGHT absolve him from wrong doing. If the warrant didn't match the list of items that were taken, don't you think Trump would be truth socialling the 'eff' out of that? I know he has claimed they planted evidence, but he was going to type that regardless. Kind of like he was telling people in the summer of 2020 that he would claim election fraud if he lost the election.
Bottom line here is either the FBI did plant evidence (I find that unlikely) or they found something incriminating that they were actually looking for and Trump is going to go to his grave claiming some conspiracy that it was planted there.
Yeah, I know that. Just wanted you guys to say it.
Here is what it really means
Is that kid holding his breath until his telegraph goes through?Yeah, I know that. Just wanted you guys to say it.
Here is what it really means
COH when he hears anything bad about Trump.Yeah, I know that. Just wanted you guys to say it.
Here is what it really means
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
That looks like you and other trumpersYeah, I know that. Just wanted you guys to say it.
Here is what it really means
Who are 'they' in the big conspiracy that's in your head?
Is it the lifelong republican in charge of the FBI or was it the lifelong Republican judge that signed the affidavit?
Both were appointed by Trump.
Please explain how those two facts can exist in your conspiracy.
It can't.
Which means your conspiracy is pure lunacy.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
This can't be right. COH said it was a predawn raid with lights and sirens:
A convoy of unmarked black SUVs and a Ryder rental truck filled with about three dozen FBI special agents and technicians entered the gates in the early evening. Heavily armed Secret Service agents were also visibly present at the gates. The Palm Beach Police Department was also present at the scene.
The entire operation was conducted relatively stealthily. No FBI people were seen in their iconic blue windbreakers announcing the presence of the Bureau. And though local law enforcement was present, the Palm Beach Police Department was careful to tweet on Tuesday that it "was not aware of the existence of a search warrant nor did our department assist the FBI in the execution of a search warrant."
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
I would be willing to bet they made sure to do everything by the book because they know it will be heavily scrutinized.
But of course, people like our resident nutjobs will still act like it wasn't done by the book.
There are now Republicans and "strong conservatives". I take strong conservatives to be those that pass the social issue litmus test.As soon as they turned on Trump, they are no longer true republicans
Schumer for one was directly quoted as saying the first he learned about this "seige" (LOL) was through the media. If he was lying, he would be found out and destroyed.
SOP for the DOJ is to conduct such operations alone and all indicators are that this is what happened.
According to the link, Trump suggests that the FBI "could have" been "planting" evidence, because they made everyone else leave the residence during the search. Trump offered no proof that anyone saw any evidence being planted or that anyone found any planted evidence when they came back.You're prescient.
Donald Trump Suggests FBI Agents 'Planting' Evidence at Mar-a-Lago
Trump claimed the FBI agents "wanted to be left alone, without any witnesses" when they searched his Florida residence on Monday.www.newsweek.com
Trump surely must be expecting more search warrants. Otherwise, what possible reason could Trump have for fabricating an excuse in advance for possession of contraband? Without more search warrants, nobody would ever know that Trump innocently (?) possessed the "planted" evidence he imagines.
Trump supporters keep demanding to know how the feds knew Trump possessed things he shouldn't -- the answer has been public all along.
Earlier this year after Trump returned several boxes of documents, the federal National Archives and Records Administration "noticed that several items were missing from their catalog of Trump White House records."
Archives threatened to go to Congress and Justice Department to get Trump to turn over records
Worried that a trove of White House records that had been brought to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate contained classified material, a top official in the former President's orbit warned his aides last fall: Do not touch those boxes.
www.cnn.com
So, everybody in government knew that the feds catalog the documents in a President's possession and keep track where they are after the President leaves office.
I'm sure Trump isn't used to anybody keeping track of him like that. So, naturally Trump claims it's someone else's fault.
What a great leader for the Republican party! Trump 2024, 2028, 2032 !
I've seen it stated (somewhere) that Wray signed off, and I have to believe Garland did as well. But it would have been malpractice if not malfeasance to clue in the politicos, including the White House.
I remember the days when you would just beat your opponent at the ballot box. I guess now we use the gestapo to take them out first.
I would put nothing past the FBI look at their corrupt history.According to the link, Trump suggests that the FBI "could have" been "planting" evidence, because they made everyone else leave the residence during the search. Trump offered no proof that anyone saw any evidence being planted or that anyone found any planted evidence when they came back.
Trump surely must be expecting more search warrants. Otherwise, what possible reason could Trump have for fabricating an excuse in advance for possession of contraband? Without more search warrants, nobody would ever know that Trump innocently (?) possessed the "planted" evidence he imagines.
Trump supporters keep demanding to know how the feds knew Trump possessed things he shouldn't -- the answer has been public all along.
Earlier this year after Trump returned several boxes of documents, the federal National Archives and Records Administration "noticed that several items were missing from their catalog of Trump White House records."
Archives threatened to go to Congress and Justice Department to get Trump to turn over records
Worried that a trove of White House records that had been brought to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate contained classified material, a top official in the former President's orbit warned his aides last fall: Do not touch those boxes.
So, everybody in government knew that the feds catalog the documents in a President's possession and keep track where they are after the President leaves office.
I'm sure Trump isn't used to anybody keeping track of him like that. So, naturally Trump claims it's someone else's fault.
What a great leader for the Republican party! Trump 2024, 2028, 2032 !
Well that happened too, but guess who refused to accept that? And then tried to steal the election?
Let's review.
A Federal Judge who was appointed by Trump
signed off on a warrant issued by an FBI director who was appointed by Trump
and was executed by a DOJ attorney who was also appointed by Trump.
And yet it's some Democrat witch hunt?
A Federal Judge who was appointed by Trump
signed off on a warrant issued by an FBI director who was appointed by Trump
and was executed by a DOJ attorney who was also appointed by Trump.
And yet it's some Democrat witch hunt?
I wouldn’t be surprised if the FBI inserted an agent onto Trump’s staff. That’s the kind of shit it does. Everything else is grassy knoll stuff. The 30 FBI agents don’t need 9 hours each to follow the road map or to search through Melania’s underwear.
This is about January 6 dirt.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
You should thank the fbi. If they didn't come out ahead of the 2016 election that Hilary was back to being investigated, crime lord Trump never would have been president
There is an SOP for serving a warrant. You never know what you will encounter, for SURE anyway, after going behind any closed door. To argue that is was some special "show" is ludicrous.
There is no heavy scrutiny of the FBI. Not from Congress. Not from the media. Not from the DOJ.
That's a false argument.
If I stealthily download your harddrive, I won't immediately know what I stole, but I would definitely know I had stolen something that wasn't mine. That's called theft.
If I leave a building and take with me boxes of documents, while knowing I didn't bring those boxes into the building with me, while also knowing that the terms by which I agreed to use that building inevitably would put me in possession of documents that I did not own, I surely would have known that keeping documents after the owner asked me to return them was also theft.
Trump is a great leader of the Republican Party Republicans love Trump (but Lincoln would still puke).
Mar-a-Lago was vacant staffed only by a skeleton crew for the summer. The family was at Bedminster. Certainly the FBI mole would have known that.
Wow.
So, look at this everybody -- Bailey's hypothesis is that the FBI might have planted evidence even though neither the FBI nor anybody else under the sun (including Trump) thought more search warrants would be served to collect documents not obtained in the previous search.
Hmmm. Bailey, how do you come down on the flat earth theory?
