Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe to see who else IU got first.He says Not do fast Zach Anderson. Why did he wait so long?
Maybe waiting to get out of Champaign. He finished his degree.Maybe to see who else IU got first.
If he is ok only playing like 10-15 minutes a game he will pick IU. If he wants to start he will not.I am hearing there is a good chance he is heading to IU. We shall see.
Plus knows all about what the B10+ 8 bringsHe’s a really good role player. Plays hard off the bench. Perfect fit.
Sounds like Galloway’s role on the team now? Of course, Goode can shoot.He’s a really good role player. Plays hard off the bench. Perfect fit.
Hard for me to believe any game Loyer ever played was fun to watch. Whiney little flopper with a Grady Dick--type punchable face.I enjoyed Luke when he was at Homestead because I follow high school sports in the Fort. He and Loyer played together for a year and they were a fun team to watch.
Not sure about your second point. Coming to Bloomington as a grad transfer might open his time commitments up a bit too much. And I think he's a better athlete than Kopp. Whatever the case though, I hope we get him.Goode is very comparable to Kopp imo but with a better nose for rebounding.
Plus graduating in 3 years, shouldn't that project for him to focus more energy toward basketball in a senior season?
A bit injury prone, and not the greatest 1 on 1 defender I would characterize as his non strengths.
Not sure about your second point. Coming to Bloomington as a grad transfer might open his time commitments up a bit too much. And I think he's a better athlete than Kopp. Whatever the case though, I hope we get him.
Too many teams with empty rosters for that to mean anything currently.If you run Goode on torvik added to the roster it takes us from 20 to 17. That’s without Tucker. So Bart likes IU so far.
For those that study this more closely...would Torvik take in to account the potential/probable playing time impacts these additions would have on teams?Too many teams with empty rosters for that to mean anything currently.
I have no idea how he does his projections... but assume he just inputs efficiency * projected minutes. How he projects minutes is beyond me. It doesn't account for glue guys like Cupps, or growth from experience... but, I'm guessing, yes?For those that study this more closely...would Torvik take in to account the potential/probable playing time impacts these additions would have on teams?
Reason I ask... anyone that we add, at this point, that will be a main rotation guy, will change how the playing time minutes are divided up. If we get Goode, and he's projected to play 15mpg...1)that's less than he played this past year at Illinois 2) that's 15 minutes that need to be taken from the players that are currently providing them data.
I guess if last years lineup with someone like Anthony in the game instead of Gabe was more efficient, that's a decent answer. Or even Xavier instead of Gabe. I know the starting lineup he was a part of was really efficient in the minutes they played together...what about a couple of the lineups with the other 4 starters and someone instead of Gabe?I have no idea how he does his projections... but assume he just inputs efficiency * projected minutes. How he projects minutes is beyond me. It doesn't account for glue guys like Cupps, or growth from experience... but, I'm guessing, yes?
If you add Cupps to any lineup the rating will drop .. but is it the reality?
I would have to pay to get that info ... so .. not going to pay.hat about a couple of the lineups with the other 4 starters and someone instead of Gabe?
Yes. Cupps should redshirt next year, especially if we get Goode.I have no idea how he does his projections... but assume he just inputs efficiency * projected minutes. How he projects minutes is beyond me. It doesn't account for glue guys like Cupps, or growth from experience... but, I'm guessing, yes?
If you add Cupps to any lineup the rating will drop .. but is it the reality?
He can't really guard any position, but Anderson isn't exactly Scottie Pippin either. He is much higher volume shooter than Anderson though. He is big ten battle tested.Goode would be a very good pickup, at this point. Assuming he's excited about being a 10-15 minute a game guy off the bench.
He's not small, he can guard multiple positions, he was an upper 30's percentage guy on decent volume this past year... He's kinda streaky, but I would think he'd be a solid perimeter threat, that doesn't have a huge trade off in terms of being a bad defender or a guy that can't moderately handle the ball.
Like I said in a different post...each of these additions should raise our "floor" a little bit. Adding an established shooter, with some size, like Goode, should fill in some depth cracks...and his shooting can, for sure, win us an extra game or two.