There is a fair question about us loosening restrictions on Iran. And I will agree it looks like a bad idea. But.
It appears that most of the damage was done by AK47s. In much of the world it is as ubiquitous as water. In the Middle East, probably more than water. The weapons and ammo used to create most of the deaths probably could be funded by many individuals on this board.
Now the rockets do cost more (I suspect, I've never priced them but God know every 4th of July people in my neighborhood sure put on one hell of a rocketry display). But even at that, we have had North Korea locked down for a LOOONG time and they could easily contribute to a much bigger display than Hamas has. Even under Maximun Pressure, Iran had troops across the Middle East spreading death and destruction. They had and still have major military posts in Syria. As another example, Cuba sent mercenaries around the world under sanctions.
I agree with the conservatives that we should keep Iran on a short lease. I just happen to also think they can carry all this out without our spending (recall, Russia is quite willing to help Iran militarily). Hamas didn't use state-of-the-art equipment. I don't know that they needed American money to do what they did. Maybe, just maybe, they would have had fewer rockets. That wouldn't have appreciably changed the death toll.
Okay, a quick look shows Hamas' rockets are estimated around $600. So to launch 1000 rockets would cost $600,000 dollars. I don't know that would be beyond Iranian means. Much like North Korea, they are quite willing to let their people go hungry to procure the military equipment they want.
“This partnership poses a threat not just to Ukraine, but to Iran’s neighbors in the region,” a senior administration official told NBC News.
www.nbcnews.com