Because it was factually inaccurate. The "deepest roster ever" stuff is simply laughable, especially when one considers that five members of the team have yet to ever wear the uniform or play in a game.
It's hilarious that you would answer a question asked of a different poster.
So it's your position I was definitive about it being the deepest roster? I guess you missed the use of the term maybe, which means it is debatable.
Stomp and tromp, stomp and tromp without addressing the point of a post. We see this stuff from you (Plural) all of the time.