ADVERTISEMENT

DOJ IG knows # of FBI informants

Still no links. Your Twitter twits don’t even link sources. You get all your information, disinformation, lies, and opinions from Twitter twits that count on your gullibility, or they’re even dumber than you.

Regardless of the officers past, the shooting was investigated and declared justified.
Not my fault that the fake news refuses to do any real journalism.


And if that shooting was remotely justified then Ben Crump should've been unemployed long ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Not my fault that the fake news refuses to do any real journalism.


And if that shooting was remotely justified then Ben Crump should've been unemployed long ago.
If that shooting was "remotely justified?"

No one is glad Ashli Babbitt died that day, but come on man:


“USCP’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) determined the officer’s conduct was lawful and within Department policy, which says an officer may use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes that action is in the defense of human life, including the officer’s own life, or in the defense of any person in immediate danger of serious physical injury,” Capitol Police said in a statement.

The officer, who remains unidentified, will not face disciplinary action.

Their actions “potentially saved Members and staff from serious injury and possible death from a large crowd of rioters who forced their way into the U.S. Capitol and to the House Chamber where Members and staff were steps away,” Capitol Police said in the release.

“If the doors were breached, the rioters would have immediate access to the House Chambers. The officer’s actions were consistent with the officer’s training and USCP policies and procedures,” the agency continued.

Babbitt was shot as she tried to enter the Speaker’s gallery just off the House floor in the Capitol on Jan. 6. A group of people who had stormed the building had slammed through a window to the gallery, and Babbitt was climbing through that space.

The officer fired one shot, hitting Babbitt in the left shoulder.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Not my fault that the fake news refuses to do any real journalism.


And if that shooting was remotely justified then Ben Crump should've been unemployed long ago.
You’re linking the fake news. You always do. 95+ percent of what you link turns out to be nonsense. You’ve got a dozen or so links to Twitter twit tweets that don’t even exist anymore because they were bull shit. Amazing that you’ve not figured this out.

The police department, you remember those organizations Republicans support, investigated the shooting and found it justified. That usually settles it for us law and order types. You no longer qualify as a law and order guy.
 
Last edited:
Not only did you not answer the question, you're omitting some pretty key and important details there.
Why would anyone with a shred of intellect believe anything coming from Capitol Police or their OPR?
Byrd had a decades-long public record of failure to exercise good judgement, was reckless, careless with weapons, had been suspended two times (that we know of), lied to prosecutors, failed FBI background checks for weapons purchases, ad. infinitum, yet was not fired, but promoted, paid over $37k from the funds allocated to assist officers injured on the job, received full time security, housing, and who knows what else after the murder.
The Fed had a lot invested in Byrd, not to mention incalculable damage to any perception of integrity. They were, and remain all-in on the fictional hero Michael Byrd. Just like you.
It's pathetic...
 
Why would anyone with a shred of intellect believe anything coming from Capitol Police or their OPR?
Byrd had a decades-long public record of failure to exercise good judgement, was reckless, careless with weapons, had been suspended two times (that we know of), lied to prosecutors, failed FBI background checks for weapons purchases, ad. infinitum, yet was not fired, but promoted, paid over $37k from the funds allocated to assist officers injured on the job, received full time security, housing, and who knows what else after the murder.
The Fed had a lot invested in Byrd, not to mention incalculable damage to any perception of integrity. They were, and remain all-in on the fictional hero Michael Byrd. Just like you.
It's pathetic...
The Capitol Police were the law enforcement good guys, the rioters were the bad guys engaged in injuring officers and breaking in and destroying government (tax payer) property.

Calling it a murder proves you are long gone as as a sane member of the party or society. It’s sad. It’s very disappointing.
 
Why would anyone with a shred of intellect believe anything coming from Capitol Police or their OPR?
Byrd had a decades-long public record of failure to exercise good judgement, was reckless, careless with weapons, had been suspended two times (that we know of), lied to prosecutors, failed FBI background checks for weapons purchases, ad. infinitum, yet was not fired, but promoted, paid over $37k from the funds allocated to assist officers injured on the job, received full time security, housing, and who knows what else after the murder.
The Fed had a lot invested in Byrd, not to mention incalculable damage to any perception of integrity. They were, and remain all-in on the fictional hero Michael Byrd. Just like you.
It's pathetic...
Until I read some of you and a few others' batshit take on this incident I didn't even know Michael Byrd was the name of the officer who shot Ashli Babbitt. So I'm not 'all-in' on anything or anyone in this particular matter, except reality and facts.
 
Can you shoot someone trespassing on your property and attempting to enter your house?
Yes, but I can’t shoot someone breaking into our County courthouse, but a policeman can (or possibly not nowadays depending on justice involved individual’s race, etc). Your analogy is dumb. That being said, I have no problem with Ashli Babbitt being shot. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
Yes, but I can’t shoot someone breaking into our County courthouse, but a policeman can (or possibly not nowadays depending on justice involved individual’s race, etc). Your analogy is dumb. That being said, I have no problem with Ashli Babbitt being shot. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
It’s a perfect analogy for Mas’ post which I was responding to.
 
It is murder of an unarmed woman, shot at point-blank range, by a 'guard' with multiple disciplinary actions on his record, who should never have been in the position to commit murder.

33 day suspension for 'forgetting' his issue Glock 22 in a public restroom. 7 day suspension for firing the weapon at a suspected stolen vehicle in his neighborhood.
The subsequent investigation by Maryland State prosecutors show Byrd lied to them during their investigation. Byrd received no sanctions for lying to prosecutors. After the Babbit murder, Byrd attempted to buy a shotgun to 'defend his home', but failed the FBI background check. The Capitol Police then tried to issue him a shotgun, but he failed the qualification tests.
There were also 3 separate additional Capitol Police referrals to the Office of Professional Responsibility, but those records 'could not be located'.
Byrd was promoted to Captain, a position created for him.

The corruption in this ruling clique is neverending .
Damn, he couldn't even get a personal weapon because he failed a background check?

Holy shit - and this is the guy the Democrats hold up as some kind of hero?
 
I get what you're saying, but I'd like to give the Capitol police some benefit of the doubt in that they didn't use deadly force until they absolutely had to.
Of course, the 2 Capitol Police standing right next to Babbitt on her side of the door didn't see the need to even try to stop her.

But your hero on the other side of the door who had issues even handling a weapon, found the need to shoot a 5' woman in the face.

That's some real heroism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Do you think unauthorized trespassers should be able to break into prohibited/strictly guarded areas of the US Capitol while members of Congress and the sitting Vice President are holding official business? It's an unfortunate situation, but that's what it boils down to.
Do you think unarmed trespassers should be shot in the face?
 
Shoulder. Not face, not neck. It’s a relatively small factual error in your part, but it’s a prime example of how you make it up as you go along.
Neck. No one dies from getting shot in the shoulder. It's a small error that small people like to turn into a big deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Neck. No one dies from getting shot in the shoulder. It's a small error that small people like to turn into a big deal.
Shoulder. Left shoulder to be precise. Stop making shit up and you’d be less intolerable. Slightly less.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Shoulder, dipshit. Left shoulder to be precise. Stop making shit up and you’d be less intolerable. Slightly less.
Byrd is such a bad shot - he was aiming for her face and neck and hit her shoulder?

He was 2 feet away. Is that what cops normally shoot at? The shoulder? lmao
 
Byrd is such a bad shot - he was aiming for her face and neck and hit her shoulder?

He was 2 feet away. Is that what cops normally shoot at? The shoulder? lmao
Your entire post is stupid. Why did you bother posting it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT