ADVERTISEMENT

Do any of RFK’s defenders still believe he’s not anti-vax?

WhyisIUBBcursed

All-Big Ten
Gold Member
Jan 11, 2024
4,023
6,405
113

Vaccine critic’s apparent selection to head HHS autism study shocks experts​

Like RFK Jr., David Geier has long clung to debunked assertions, scientists say​

Measles and tetanus vaccine vials
Vernon Bryant/The Dallas Morning News via AP
helen-b-avatar-small2-80x80.png

By Helen Branswell
March 26, 2025
Senior Writer, Infectious Diseases
News that a major player in the anti-vaccine community may have been tasked by the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a study looking for a link between immunizations and autism has been met with incredulity and dropped jaws among vaccine experts and others familiar with the anti-vaccine movement.
The apparent choice of David Geier — who does not have a medical degree and who was disciplined by the State of Maryland’s Board of Physicians for practicing medicine without a license — to conduct a study looking for the link that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long asserted exists, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, struck many as a surreal choice.
ADVERTISEMENT

Geier and his father, a physician who lost his medical license in multiple states, promoted claims that use of the preservative thimerosal in vaccines led to an increase in autism diagnoses. A raft of studies has refuted the allegation, and autism rates have not declined in the more than 20 yearssince thimerosal was phased out of most vaccines in the United States. For a time, the two treated autistic children with unproven therapies, including a drug licensed for prostate cancer that induces chemical castration.
 
It's my understanding that the level of autism in America is much greater than the rest of the world. As in any investigation/ questioning of current procedures and processes, the initial correlation may be incorrect, but if the conversation causes new finding, then it was a successful exercise! It's not important to enter an investigation with a correct opinion, it's only important that the end findings uncover new, provable conclusions.
 
It's my understanding that the level of autism in America is much greater than the rest of the world. As in any investigation/ questioning of current procedures and processes, the initial correlation may be incorrect, but if the conversation causes new finding, then it was a successful exercise! It's not important to enter an investigation with a correct opinion, it's only important that the end findings uncover new, provable conclusions.
Damn. This study has been done over and over and over. There is no fvcking link. Just stop
 
Damn. This study has been done over and over and over. There is no fvcking link. Just stop
Why are our citizens more prone to be on the scale?
Simple question.
Go ahead and read all of the released studies. ANSWER one question, why are we more fvcked up than the rest of the world?
 
Damn. This study has been done over and over and over. There is no fvcking link. Just stop
OHHHHHH In my 56 years of circling the sun, I have never found one scientific study that was the end all be all. There is ALWAYS new things to learn, that were either unknowns prior, or we weren't even smart enough to understand to ask a specific question.

So, in your apparent very short sighted, ability to simply accept "today's" word as definitive, all answering and never to be questioned again.
YOU, go Fvck youself. You know nothing of our scientific method and are a total partisan ignorant hack. Questioning things, uncover the unknown. I hope your prostate gets inflammed and you simply say... That can't be, it's been studied.
 
OHHHHHH In my 56 years of circling the sun, I have never found one scientific study that was the end all be all. There is ALWAYS new things to learn, that were either unknowns prior, or we weren't even smart enough to understand to ask a specific question.
I'm just pleasantly surprised you referred to a year as "circling the sun".
;)
 
OHHHHHH In my 56 years of circling the sun, I have never found one scientific study that was the end all be all. There is ALWAYS new things to learn, that were either unknowns prior, or we weren't even smart enough to understand to ask a specific question.

So, in your apparent very short sighted, ability to simply accept "today's" word as definitive, all answering and never to be questioned again.
YOU, go Fvck youself. You know nothing of our scientific method and are a total partisan ignorant hack. Questioning things, uncover the unknown. I hope your prostate gets inflammed and you simply say... That can't be, it's been studied.
You’re way too defensive. You weren’t one of the guys that did the repeatedly debunked study.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhyisIUBBcursed
You’re way too defensive. You weren’t one of the guys that did the repeatedly debunked study.
My original post was not to defend any study, yet to admire never accepting "todays truth" as gospel. I quite explicitly said that questioning things, leads to new learning, that maybe/ probably we never had the intelligence to ask a specific question to begin with. RFK very well may be a loon. But if so, so was Tesla, Marconi, Edison, Eienstein...
We have a KNOWN higher autism rate. WHY?
 
My original post was not to defend any study, yet to admire never accepting "todays truth" as gospel. I quite explicitly said that questioning things, leads to new learning, that maybe/ probably we never had the intelligence to ask a specific question to begin with. RFK very well may be a loon. But if so, so was Tesla, Marconi, Edison, Eienstein...
We have a KNOWN higher autism rate. WHY?
I wouldn’t compare RFK to any of those guys.
 
I wouldn’t compare RFK to any of those guys.
Okay, but I think you're diggin in a hole that I didn't have a shovel in to begin with.
WE have an issue. It needs to be looked at with different eyes than who potentially created it to start with. New eyes, are not a bad thing.
 
My original post was not to defend any study, yet to admire never accepting "todays truth" as gospel. I quite explicitly said that questioning things, leads to new learning, that maybe/ probably we never had the intelligence to ask a specific question to begin with. RFK very well may be a loon. But if so, so was Tesla, Marconi, Edison, Eienstein...
We have a KNOWN higher autism rate. WHY?
Do you have a clue how many actual real scientific studies by…. You know…. Actual real scientists have been done disproving the link between vaccines and autism? I don’t know why we’re so fvcked up as a society, but I’m pretty sure Pfizer didn’t cause it. You know what is actually true? When dumb fvckers don’t vaccinate because they believe hacks who find a friend’s medical coat and spew nonsense, morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases skyrockets. I always figured population control would occur due to famine, nuclear war, etc…. The good news is dumbassery will take care of it
.
 
OHHHHHH In my 56 years of circling the sun, I have never found one scientific study that was the end all be all. There is ALWAYS new things to learn, that were either unknowns prior, or we weren't even smart enough to understand to ask a specific question.

So, in your apparent very short sighted, ability to simply accept "today's" word as definitive, all answering and never to be questioned again.
YOU, go Fvck youself. You know nothing of our scientific method and are a total partisan ignorant hack. Questioning things, uncover the unknown. I hope your prostate gets inflammed and you simply say... That can't be, it's been studied.
And my prostate is just fine. Thanks for your concern.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Do you have a clue how many actual real scientific studies by…. You know…. Actual real scientists have been done disproving the link between vaccines and autism? I don’t know why we’re so fvcked up as a society, but I’m pretty sure Pfizer didn’t cause it. You know what is actually true? When dumb fvckers don’t vaccinate because they believe hacks who find a friend’s medical coat and spew nonsense, morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases skyrockets. I always figured population control would occur due to famine, nuclear war, etc…. The good news is dumbassery will take care of it
.
Can a study actually disprove a link? No it can't. It can only NOT FIND a link.
You are PRETTY sure that Pfizer .......... I never trust and ALWAYS question a message board warrior that PRETTY much is confident. If someone has a knife to your genitals, how PRETTY much confident are you that they won't stop you from breading? Kinda PRETTY much, really PRETTY much, or totally sure and willing to see how it ends up? ?
You all trust your nutz, in a system that is designed to have repeated additional studies because there is NO ANSWER that is ever definitive. EVER!
You are fighting me, because we have a problem, that you can't explain and apparently are okay with simply accepting, and I am simply saying that asking more questions is a good thing.
I don't like telling anyone to go fvck themselves, but there are times that it is required.
 
Can a study actually disprove a link? No it can't. It can only NOT FIND a link.
You are PRETTY sure that Pfizer .......... I never trust and ALWAYS question a message board warrior that PRETTY much is confident. If someone has a knife to your genitals, how PRETTY much confident are you that they won't stop you from breading? Kinda PRETTY much, really PRETTY much, or totally sure and willing to see how it ends up? ?
You all trust your nutz, in a system that is designed to have repeated additional studies because there is NO ANSWER that is ever definitive. EVER!
You are fighting me, because we have a problem, that you can't explain and apparently are okay with simply accepting, and I am simply saying that asking more questions is a good thing.
I don't like telling anyone to go fvck themselves, but there are times that it is required.
You are a deranged human being. I hope you live alone in the woods and haven’t procreated
 

Vaccine critic’s apparent selection to head HHS autism study shocks experts​

Like RFK Jr., David Geier has long clung to debunked assertions, scientists say​

Measles and tetanus vaccine vials
Vernon Bryant/The Dallas Morning News via AP
helen-b-avatar-small2-80x80.png

By Helen Branswell
March 26, 2025
Senior Writer, Infectious Diseases
News that a major player in the anti-vaccine community may have been tasked by the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a study looking for a link between immunizations and autism has been met with incredulity and dropped jaws among vaccine experts and others familiar with the anti-vaccine movement.
The apparent choice of David Geier — who does not have a medical degree and who was disciplined by the State of Maryland’s Board of Physicians for practicing medicine without a license — to conduct a study looking for the link that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long asserted exists, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, struck many as a surreal choice.
ADVERTISEMENT

Geier and his father, a physician who lost his medical license in multiple states, promoted claims that use of the preservative thimerosal in vaccines led to an increase in autism diagnoses. A raft of studies has refuted the allegation, and autism rates have not declined in the more than 20 yearssince thimerosal was phased out of most vaccines in the United States. For a time, the two treated autistic children with unproven therapies, including a drug licensed for prostate cancer that induces chemical castration.
It’s possible there’s been a worse-than-Kennedy Cabinet pick in my lifetime, but no one is coming to mind. Maybe Matt Gaetz for AG, but that nomination was ultimately withdrawn.
 
It's my understanding that the level of autism in America is much greater than the rest of the world. As in any investigation/ questioning of current procedures and processes, the initial correlation may be incorrect, but if the conversation causes new finding, then it was a successful exercise! It's not important to enter an investigation with a correct opinion, it's only important that the end findings uncover new, provable conclusions.
Polio.
 
The question however still to be answered by the the thread title is:

Do any of RFK’s defenders still believe he’s not anti-vax?​


I understand @Joe_Hoopsier believes the study should commence, and he’s entitled to his opinion. But do you defend RFK is not anti-vax? And do you support his choice to head the study?
 
The question however still to be answered by the the thread title is:

Do any of RFK’s defenders still believe he’s not anti-vax?​


I understand @Joe_Hoopsier believes the study should commence, and he’s entitled to his opinion. But do you defend RFK is not anti-vax? And do you support his choice to head the study?
Thank you for trying to get this back on the rail. I doubt it will and I doubt too many Trumpers will jump in and support this nonsense because it’s truly indefensible
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT