Masters is starting to surge and he has not even been funded yet by the gop that will start soon. Again victory dances over July push polls will not age well by November as this happens every cycle. The common theme as a certain poster likes to say is Trump candidates are starting to surge and will continue to surge.
NEW ARIZONA POLL by Emerson SENATE (D) Mark Kelly 47% (+2) (R) Blake Masters 45% GOVERNOR
(R) Kari Lake 46% (=) (D) Katie Hobbs 46%
PRESIDENT (R) Donald Trump 44% (+3) (D) Joe Biden 41% 627
LV | 09/06-07 | R36/D33/I31
Masters will win. Kelly was up by almost 10 against McSally at this time last election before only winning by 2 and that was only because the GOP abandoned her. She was an awful candidate but would have won with funding.
At this point, I'm seriously starting to wonder if one, or maybe both of you aren't just less obvious versions of Lucy and her parody posting. bailey literally cited a poll which leans GOP, and has a 3% edge of Pubs polled over Dems and a 5% edge over Independents to claim Masters is "surging". he's still losing in a poll with that sort of bias and utilizing an outdated "likely voters" model which is completely irrelevant post-roe, and you describe him as "surging"?
How far behind would he be with a more realistic 33/33/33 sampling? I mean we've already had actual elections post-Roe which basically demonstrate how outdated this model is for this particular midterm season. Post Roe, Dems have exceeded Biden's 2020 numbers in all 4 special elections, as well as the abortion ballot issue in Kansas.
June 28, 2022 | Nebraska 1st | R+17 | R+5 | D+12 |
Aug. 9, 2022 | Minnesota 1st | R+15 | R+4 | D+11 |
Aug. 23, 2022 | New York 19th | R+4 | D+2 | D+6 |
Aug. 23, 2022 | New York 23rd | R+15 | R+7 | D+9 |
| Post-Dobbs average | R+13 | R+3 | D+9 |
The first # is partisan lean, and the second is actual vote. The third is margin swing, which favored Dems in all Post- Roe races. The Pubs still won some of the races, but by far less votes than the lean (esp in a "red wave") would suggest. The swing means far more Dems turned out to vote than either history or the districts partisan component would indicate. That means a LOT of people who didn't fit into the category of "likely voter" but were in fact REGISTERED voters turned out to vote.
That alone points out the irrelevance of "likely voter" models because the whole basis behind "likely voters" is the concept that voters whose candidate lost the POTUS two years earlier will be angry and will turn out in greater numbers than the voters who support the current Admin and are complacent and unmotivated...
Before Roe that was valid, one of the main reasons Biden's approval numbers were so low was because his favorability among Dems was low to coordinate with his numbers among Pubs. But Biden's numbers among Dems is up around 90% and the enthusiasm gap with was double digits has basically disappeared, which takes away the inherent advantages Pubs had 6 months ago and undercuts the whole basis for "likely voter" models. Not only does Emerson utilize likely voter, but they also weighed this model to Pubs +3, and at this stage that seems ridiculous.
If Masters were "surging", he wouldn't change his positions. And he didn't change his positions on the basis of "push polls". Here is a good indicator of exactly why Masters is desperately trying to reinvent himself- a survey of Latinos in AZ...
"A whopping 80% of Arizona Latinos support keeping abortion legal,
regardless of their personal beliefs."
“Abortion has become more salient,” said Gary Segura, president and co-founder of BSP Research, the firm that conducted the poll, with 80% of Latino voters saying the procedure should be legal. That sentiment is high between men and women, with 83% and 78% agreeing it’s wrong to make abortion illegal and take that choice away.
This is important because many Latinos are Catholic and pro-life – something Republicans sought to capitalize on when courting them. That became problematic with the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Another deal breaker?
Latinos won’t vote for candidates backed by white supremacists or who participated in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, the survey shows."
The most extensive poll of Arizona Latino voters yet this year reveals surprising results about abortion and the lack of voter outreach.
www.yahoo.com