This is the only topic in which I will accept the expert card being played.I can assure you, you're wrong.
I defer to you, Sir.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the only topic in which I will accept the expert card being played.I can assure you, you're wrong.
Of all the things in which to be an expert and I get this.This is the only topic in which I will accept the expert card being played.
I defer to you, Sir.
@BradStevens both of you go to the soccer thread and watch the video noodle posted on one minute of silence. i swear i cant stop watching it and laughingOf all the things in which to be an expert and I get this.
Fitting.
Nobody loves a fat girl, but oh how a fat girl can love.I can assure you, you're wrong.
I can name all 48 states.I can name all 192 countries. In under ten minutes. Working on the capitals.
Were you even born before 1959?I can name all 48 states.
So her financial planning advice is have 6 months of cash stashed in your house.
She’s pathetic.
Or she has a bug out bag and a one way plane ticketSounds like she's a Dave Ramsey disciple.
Don’t you all keep a stash in a tub of duck feed?Or she has a bug out bag and a one way plane ticket
Can you find for me where Ramsey says keep six months of green cash most likely with no tax paid on it in your house?Sounds like she's a Dave Ramsey disciple.
A great many places really.Don’t you all keep a stash in a tub of duck feed?
@UncleMark do you believe the two of them always evened up with thousands of cash they stored in their homes?Can you find for me where Ramsey says keep six months of green cash most likely with no tax paid on it in your house?
Diversification, Moderation, and OversimplificationDiversification.
@UncleMark do you believe the two of them always evened up with thousands of cash they stored in their homes?
Doesn’t everyone?Or she has a bug out bag and a one way plane ticket
Doesn’t everyone?
Passports, IDs, Glock.
So it’s okay for crooks to determine who should be prosecuted?I don't know and really don't care. Their personal lives and finances have no bearing on Trump's guilt or innocence. That said, they were fvcking stoopid and deserve to be shamed and ridiculed. If dumb was a felony I'd charge them.
Where we’re going we don’t need roads . . . . Or bitcoin.Bitcoin.
You forgot bitcoin.
Reality?Where we’re going we don’t need roads . . . . Or bitcoin.
I just checked in to see what condition my condition is in.Reality?
I have caches of bitcoin, 20 $5 bills for the dullards who won't accept bitcoin and ammo for each of the 4 firearms I'll have on my person stashed in PVC tubes along all of my 12 possible routes of egress from the city.Doesn’t everyone?
Passports, IDs, Glock.
Nothing like being properly prepared.I have caches of bitcoin, 20 $5 bills for the dullards who won't accept bitcoin and ammo for each of the 4 firearms I'll have on my person stashed in PVC tubes along all of my 12 possible routes of egress from the city.
Amen brother. Amen.Nothing like be properly prepared.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.Reality?
If you go just by the name Belize, it's easy to confuse it's location with regards to South or Central America. Up until I garduated high school it was known as British Honduras, which provides more of a geographical clue... At least for more of the US population in general...I know where Belize is. I think it’s considered to be South America but I’m not 100% certain.
It's weird how two different people can see things entirely differently. I thought her dad's (John Floyd) answer, esp when he mentioned the racial discrimination he encountered when he tried to use credit cards in a restaurant in the 60s was a slam dunk. I even predicted that would happen, because I knew by her passion she wasn't lying...
She's a prosecutor, not a judge. She has no role in determining guilt or inocense, and I doubt she will even actually prosecute in court. I don't think that was even designed to be Wade's role, he's more of a behind the scenes organizer...Sure it does. Would you be OK being prosecuted by someone who has flagrantly violated the law like they have?
The corrupt have brought the charges - she compained on it - and that makes all the charges against him suspect.
That's good.... a lot of people in this country probably don't know where Texas, California, or any other state is located.Yeah I was wrong on S America. But I did know exactly where it was on the map.
I can name the capitol of Indiana.I can name all 48 states.
You're just going to leave us hanging like that?That's good.... a lot of people in this country probably don't know where Texas, California, or any other state is located.
Carmel?I can name the capitol of Indiana.
More specifically…3Up?Carmel?
And they are both smarter than Trump’s attorneysI don't know and really don't care. Their personal lives and finances have no bearing on Trump's guilt or innocence. That said, they were fvcking stoopid and deserve to be shamed and ridiculed. If dumb was a felony I'd charge them.
A mountain??!!!Where we’re going we don’t need roads . . . . Or bitcoin.
The Grand Jury hears one side. When was the last time any Grand Jury voted to not charge someone.She's a prosecutor, not a judge. She has no role in determining guilt or inocense, and I doubt she will even actually prosecute in court. I don't think that was even designed to be Wade's role, he's more of a behind the scenes organizer...
And as she pointed out yesterday she isn't on trial. As far as I know there are no alledged violations of any GA criminal codes. So I'm not sure how she violated the law. One of the defense attorney's tried to bring up a claim that Wade had committed "adultery", and McAfee practically laughed him out of court...
The defendants were all investigated by a Special Grand Jury who in turn recomended that some of them face actual indictment before a Grand Jury. The Special Grand Jury even recomended more indictments (like for Rudy and Graham) than the Grand jury eventually handed down. If the claim is that Wade wasn't "qualified" the fact that he was able to secure both sets of indictments sort of refutes that claim. And presumably if Wade isn't qualified to perform the job at the proper level of quality, that would benefit, not be a source of hardship for the accused...
The Grand Jury decides if charges are warranted. They base that off of the prosecutions ability to present their evidence that a crime was committed. I could be wrong, but I think whenever a prosecution concludes not to pursue a case it's largely based on the possibility that they don't feel they could secure an indictment from a Grand Jury. So often times weak cases don't even make it to a Grand Jury stage and are unceremoniously dropped...The Grand Jury hears one side. When was the last time any Grand Jury voted to not charge someone.
Grand juries are a rubber stamp and even your own leftists dupes recognize that.The Grand Jury decides if charges are warranted. They base that off of the prosecutions ability to present their evidence that a crime was committed. I could be wrong, but I think whenever a prosecution concludes not to pursue a case it's largely based on the possibility that they don't feel they could secure an indictment from a Grand Jury. So often times weak cases don't even make it to a Grand Jury stage and are unceremoniously dropped...
So I'd say if a prosecution decides to convene a Grand Jury and seek an indictment, at a minimum the prosecution feels they have a solid case. Obviously a prosecutor who decides to take a case to a Grand Jury and fails to secure an indictment may have their abilities questioned. It happens, but I think when it's does it's just basically noted that the GJ adjourned.
Obviously for these final defendants two seperate GJs decided that there was a degree of likelihood that crimes occurred and that the accused committed those crimes. No idea what Wade and Willis sleeping together has to do with any of that, and the fact that Wade was able to navigate getting the case thru two seperate GJ procedures would seem to at least cast doubts on claims he wasn't qualified.
That criticism would seem to apply if he had NOT been able to obtain such solid indictments. And remember he also secured very advantageous plea agreements from at least 3 or 4 of the indicted. So the idea that he was in over his head strikes me as silly...
It's a complicated RICO case. Wade doesn't have experience within that particular, but Fani has successfully prosecuted several, including a high profile case vs a drug gang. To this point, I'd say the case is in very capable hands and the citizens of GA are getting their money's worth from the folks chosen to prosecute the case.
And ex-Gov Barnes put it very succinctly when he was asked why he turned down the position later offered to Wade. He said as a Gov he endured 4 years of being surrounded by bodyguards and he didn't want to live like that for the rest of his life...
He's an ex (Dem) Governor who currently doesn't feel the need to be protected by security. But he knows that if he were to accept the Special Prosecutors position it would never again be safe enough for he or his family to travel around without security. What does that say about the defendants and the type of people that "support" them?
Trump seems to attract the stoopids. And in GA that "ability" seems to extend to his co-defendants as well...And they are both smarter than Trump’s attorneys