"Had to look up “replacement theory.”Had to look up “replacement theory.”
I think i have heard sociologists and statisticians argue about when whites would become a non-majority (>50%) in the US population my whole life. It was never treated as racist theory - just math and birth rates.
When did the focus shift to a theory of “intent” versus “natural progression” - and more important - why, and what was the mode of change?
I’ll go first. I do not believe there is a “plan”
to “replace” white people. I do believe some folks are stirring up division and hatred on the basis of, and between, racial groups, and the weak minded help them by believing internet BS and helping it along with false claims of false racism. And you wind up with social media radicalizing blacks and whites to hate each other.
So the better question for society is who is doing it and why?
I’ll go first. Politicians, for votes, in the libraries, on campus and public schools, aided by anti-capitalist, drug-addled Woodstock Nation educators?
I think i have heard sociologists and statisticians argue about when whites would become a non-majority (>50%) in the US population my whole life. It was never treated as racist theory - just math and birth rates."
I guess I'll accept this on face value as true since you maintain it to be so. Maybe you don't watch Tucker or even Fox?
But he's got the most watched show on the most watched cable network, so his audience is pretty vast. And as this video demonstrates, "replacement theory" is one of his most widely discussed topics. So it's safe to assume that a large portion of his audience doesn't have to look it up the way you did...
Some on the Right on this board seem to characterize the board's lefties as "out of touch" and not living in the real world. These same folks never seem to be attuned to Fox News, and in your case have never heard of topics like "the replacement theory". So maybe the out of touch critique is just as applicable to those on the Right as it is seemingly applied to the board's Left. Curious as to how enlightening you find the content of this video, as far as awakening you to possible extremism masquerading as mainstream news?
Now assuming you watched the video, does Tucker's application and use of "replacement theory" strike you as the benign sociologist/statistician model of math and birth rates. Do you think the kid in New York took his cue from people like Tucker, or mathematicians and statisticians? I realize you guys have never heard of 4 chan, but the kid starts his manifesto out talking about how his radicalization began when he started to immerse himself in 4 chan during the pandemic...