This team never once passed the eye test. At no point during the season did you see a team that was actually …. good. Had moments. But nothing sustained.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, consistently inconsistent.We are actually very consistent at being who we are.
Jekyll and Hyde.
just like every recent year.
We had A LOT of stretches within games where we looked really good.This team never once passed the eye test. At no point during the season did you see a team that was actually …. good. Had moments. But nothing sustained.
Yes. Frustrating because IU can never get a group that cares enough to win the easy ones. Penn State, Ohio State, Northwestern.This team never once passed the eye test. At no point during the season did you see a team that was actually …. good. Had moments. But nothing sustained.
Yep.This team never once passed the eye test. At no point during the season did you see a team that was actually …. good. Had moments. But nothing sustained.
A joke of a non conference schedule is how. We lost to Syracuse, they were one of our harder non conference games and they have lost 15 gamesI still can’t figure out how this team has won 18 games???
They got a lot of wins early against Bob’s Barber College.I still can’t figure out how this team has won 18 games???
This is definitely a weird team, and the team has certainly had its opportunities. Seasons can come down to a few possessions or even one possession. Things tend to work out pretty well when you have a Yogi Ferrell, Oladipo, and a Calbert Cheaney. This team's biggest shortcoming is a lack of a playmaking guard or wing. Lander and Bates needed to be better than what they were for this team to be better. Rob or X are the closest things IU has to a playmaker. Other teams had a playmaker, IU didn't.
I think this team was good enough to get to the NCAA's.
At the start of last season, when whispers that Lander probably wasn’t gonna be competitive…I made a post that basically said that if Lander wasn’t able to overtake Rob and Al as the PG, it was a really bad sign for our program.This is definitely a weird team, and the team has certainly had its opportunities. Seasons can come down to a few possessions or even one possession. Things tend to work out pretty well when you have a Yogi Ferrell, Oladipo, and a Calbert Cheaney. This team's biggest shortcoming is a lack of a playmaking guard or wing. Lander and Bates needed to be better than what they were for this team to be better. Rob or X are the closest things IU has to a playmaker. Other teams had a playmaker, IU didn't.
I think this team was good enough to get to the NCAA's.
Stewart and Kopp played a lot of minutes for this team, which is a problem. Just not athletic enough or able to create their own shot. They average 6 ppg, which isn't enough production.I agree that there are no playmakers.
I would also argue that the team has zero mental and physical toughness.
Easy. Just look at the pre-conference schedule.I still can’t figure out how this team has won 18 games???