Damn, as someone who has testified before 6 judges in my "side gig" as a scientific expert witness, that would be a dream.
One time in the District of Florida, one generic pharma company was suing another one, claiming that the competitor's product was less pure than it was claimed to be.
How can you tell how pure something is? Analytical chemistry, including chromatography, where you get traces like this and each "bump" stands for a pure compound. No extra "bumps" means high purity.
Pretty simple.
I was up to explain this to the judge and the lawyers sought to qualify me as a witness.
She said "OK, as long as he doesn't talk about any of those
graph thingies. That is a waste of my time".
I guess another expert had tried to explain chromatography earlier in the trial and really confused her. I had to ditch all of the figures we were going to show and just explain, in words, that I had looked at the data and I can definitely estimate product purity as such-and-such.
She didn't want to know why, or how. That was too tough for her.
I have seen some similarly science-phobic judges, but she takes the cake.