I'm too dumb to understand. How can you sell if buying is blocked?No.... but nobody is closed out from selling. They are just blocking buying
I'm too dumb to understand. How can you sell if buying is blocked?No.... but nobody is closed out from selling. They are just blocking buying
Haha. Robinhood has shut down additional purchase of GME stock. Cue the conspiracies that an owner of Robinhood is Citadel which bailed out Melvin Capital.
I think technically, neither selling nor buying is blocked, but rather, opening new positions is blocked. So people with short positions can buy, and people with long positions can sell. And, of course, that limitation is only placed on people on those platforms, so others can provide the necessary bids. Most likely, the "others" are the institutional investors who are trying to get out of this mess.I'm too dumb to understand. How can you sell if buying is blocked?
I'm too dumb to understand. How can you sell if buying is blocked?
At the least I hope this throws some light on some of the naked corruption people knew was there but probably couldn’t entirely understand or prove.The pitchforks and torches may be intended as a joke, but when those crazy poor people talk about burning everything to the ground, this is the kind of thing that sets them off.
I'm too dumb to understand. How can you sell if buying is blocked?
I think technically, neither selling nor buying is blocked, but rather, opening new positions is blocked. So people with short positions can buy, and people with long positions can sell. And, of course, that limitation is only placed on people on those platforms, so others can provide the necessary bids. Most likely, the "others" are the institutional investors who are trying to get out of this mess.
This is why I just handed my shit over to a guy I'd come to trust (and who was well thought of by others) and told him to invest it as if I was his dad. So far he's done me good.The market maker who sits in between a buyer/seller does all of the direct buying/selling (taking the difference between the ask/bid price). So in this case the market maker was buying shares from robinhood accounts, but not selling any shares to them.
That seems like a flawed analogy on his part. The Redditors do not seem to be making false or misleading statements. To the contrary, they have announced to everyone what they are doing.
Here's more nuanced analysis by someone more knowledgeable than me:
I think that in modern markets you could even do a bit better than that and have a completely honest pump-and-dump:
The point here is that it is at least theoretically possible that no one buys stock for any reason other than “hey it’s a fun pump.” That is, no one is deceived about the fundamentals (there’s no fake news about the company), and also no one is deceived about the technicals. No one says “huh this stock is up on a lot of good buying pressure, I should buy some”; everyone who buys says “hey this stock is up because it’s being pumped, and if I get in now I might still get out before it collapses, and that’ll be fun.” It is “respect the pump” as a quasi-mystical mantra.
- I show up on Reddit and say “hey let’s pump GameStop.”
- We all buy GameStop, knowing that we’re just doing it for the pump, with no real or fake catalyst for the stock to go up.
- It goes up, because we bought a lot of it.
- Other people see us doing this, read my Reddit post, know we are pumping the stock, and also buy it, because we seem to be having fun, and they like fun too.
- Eventually some of us get bored and start selling and the price collapses.
I bet the SEC would say that’s market manipulation, but I am not so sure. I suppose we did our trading “for the purpose of inducing the purchase or sale of such security by others,” but not by deceiving them about what’s going on. “Join us in a fun game of chicken,” was our basic message here. Did we try “to create or effect a price or price trend that does not reflect legitimate forces of supply and demand”? Who’s to say what’s “legitimate”? Surely the price did not reflect expectations about future cash flows, but just as surely the price reflected supply and demand: We all wanted to own it because we were having fun, so the price went up.
Or, simply announce that they are shorting the stock, which itself can drive the price down if it’s a significant player.Or another way to look at it, they are the reddit and more effective version of a bald guy who has silly bells and whistles going off on his daily TV show saying "BUY THIS STOCK!!!!!"
I have yet to see an argument that separates the two in my mind. CNBC is a TV station full of analysts saying, "you should buy this stock because of X, Y, Z" Seems to me the DFV guy on reddit did his homework and said, "The people who shorted the GME stock are way over extended. If you purchase the stock now and hold it it is undervalued and these guys are going to have to pay up which will drive up the price leading to a nice profit for you."
There are people at hedge funds looking for those kind of buys all the time. They buy these short positions, leak a bunch of info to CNBC and other market watchers about how the stock is overvalued because of X, Y, Z and then reap the benefits off the downward pressure on the stocks price. Turn about is fair play.
I can’t wait for the movie.
There are multiple avenues of approach to attacking Lyin’ Ted. Her fainting couch approach is lame AF.Anyone other than Ted Cruz, I'd agree with you immediately. Since it's Ted Cruz, I...really need to think about this one.
This short squeeze isn't the only thing that Janet is looking into.Buy Crypto before GI Joe kills the dollar value and makes the paper worthless.
You might be right, but I'm not willing to give Ted that rope without consideration.There are multiple avenues of approach to attacking Lyin’ Ted. Her fainting couch approach is lame AF.
OMG they put him back out there after an earlier egg laying?!? Good lordHe killed it on CNBC earlier. Hahaha
He's dodging the liquidity questions while they're actively drawing "several hundred million" on their credit lines.OMG they put him back out there after an earlier egg laying?!? Good lord
Redditors are profiting from GameStop stock going up, which is understandable. My question is, who’s reaping the billions in profits from the short-sale losses? When someone sells short, who buys short? Who’s the lender?
WTF does any of this have to do with MTIOTF?
Do the lenders lend for the interest rate only or are they betting the stock will go up? Don’t they lose when it goes down? Seems like a great deal for them. Gain interest if the stock goes down. Gain interest plus capital gain if it goes up.I assume the major investment banks, likely those that ipo’d the company. Technically any brokerage could have shares available for loan. It will be very interesting.
Do the lenders lend for the interest rate only or are they betting the stock will go up? Don’t they lose when it goes down? Seems like a great deal for them. Gain interest if the stock goes down. Gain interest plus capital gain if it goes up.
The funny thing for Me is how Hedge Funds are complaining about this. Anytime you Short a Stock, in theory you are accepting the risk of almost Unlimited Loss. The higher the stock Price goes the worse the position becomes, and the more it costs you to get out from under. If another Hedge Fund or Investment Company kept buying shares of the Stock based upon their Research and Conclusions and the Price rose like this it would be just part of doing business. What ticks them off is Joe The Plumber, Mike Main Street and other Ordinary People have found a way to gather and exchange information to Trade a Stock. It's as if they think this is a game for a limited number of Players, and how dare these ignorant bumpkins show up to play their Game and beat them at it.
JDB..“If they are all egging each other on using a social-media platform, they are effectively engaged in a crowdsourced pump-and-dump scheme,” said Daniel Hawke, a partner at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP.
The traders “are making no effort to conceal their apparent intent to manipulate the price of the stock,” added Mr. Hawke, a former chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s market abuse unit.
![]()
GameStop Stock Surge Tests Scope of SEC’s Manipulation Rules
The frenzy for GameStop shares has played out on public websites where investors exhort others to buy shares and options, which could make it easier for regulators to levy claims of manipulation.www.wsj.com
I'm not sure this is necessarily the tendie-loving basement dwellers doing of and by themselves.The funny thing for Me is how Hedge Funds are complaining about this. Anytime you Short a Stock, in theory you are accepting the risk of almost Unlimited Loss. The higher the stock Price goes the worse the position becomes, and the more it costs you to get out from under. If another Hedge Fund or Investment Company kept buying shares of the Stock based upon their Research and Conclusions and the Price rose like this it would be just part of doing business. What ticks them off is Joe The Plumber, Mike Main Street and other Ordinary People have found a way to gather and exchange information to Trade a Stock. It's as if they think this is a game for a limited number of Players, and how dare these ignorant bumpkins show up to play their Game and beat them at it.
JDB..
Saw an interesting note today on another site.
It talked about the Whales counterfeiting stock to attempt short term attacks upon companies to drive them down to the point of going out of business. The post said there is a term for this; 'Strategic-fails-to-deliver".
Can you educate me on this little tactic?
I don't know..the article was not complete..I'll work a little harder to find out...just wondered if you knew the term...thanksI have not heard of this, is the site confusing naked shorts with counterfeiting or claiming some of it is?
What I can't figure out is why Robinhood would side with the hedge funds/institutional investors. Their whole brand was setup for smaller investors, hence the name. What a way to go down.
They definitely having some explaining to do. Probably in court.
Apparently their CEO (who looks like he's 15 and lives in his mom's basement) will be on Capitol Hill soon. Should be entertaining.I think Robinhood’s motivation was “oh shit now we are going to get sued and the SEC may hammer is too”.
Hold the line, ape.Meanwhile GME down to $118 per share lol
Can sellers 'sell stock that doesn't exist?I have not heard of this, is the site confusing naked shorts with counterfeiting or claiming some of it is?
Can sellers 'sell stock that doesn't exist?