Says Penn State, Rutgers, Iowa, Wisconsin, OSU, etc. Oh, and TJD and Lander would qualify as top 50 players. There isn't a whole lot of difference between the players rated outside the 5*-150, other than exposure. What this team needs is continuity. Upperclassmen with the right character build the program. When your upperclassmen and best players are your hardest working players and leaders, you tend to have a solid program. We will start to see the effects of that next year (if the season gets played). What did all the contending teams in the B10 have in common last year? Upperclassmen PG and at least one solid upperclass big. A team is only as strong as its weakest link, and top 50 doesn't matter if they aren't a team player.
We need multiple top 50 players to contend for the big ten.