Nah, he makes a rational argument. It's one advanced by Aloha here as well.
I think he has a couple of really bad premises.
First, that “moderate” Kamala is the real Kamala. That she’s not putting on an act today, she was putting on an act in 2019.
She’s a California politician - Bay Area. I believe her a lot more when she said she wanted to ban fracking, pay for prisoners to have sex changes, have government take over health insurance, etc. than I do when she disavows those things.
Second is that the far left is on its way out of the Democratic Party. Had it not been for some party maneuvering — especially in 2020 but also in 2016 — there’s a very good chance Bernie Sanders would’ve been the Dem nominee. Even when Biden became the nominee, Sanders was given a lot of influence over the party’s platform…by his own admission.
So I disagree that Frum made a rational argument. It rests upon these kinds of false premises.
There are plenty of good arguments for a conservative not to vote for Donald Trump. But there’s not a good argument for a conservative to vote for a Kamala Harris.
No sale.