ADVERTISEMENT

Atlantic just released all the texts this a.m. and it is not good

There are two elements here. There's the sensitivity of the information, which obviously raises concerns, but there's also the official and novel nature of it. Using these apps to, say, recap with the group what you talked about in a meeting is one thing. But updating the group with new information or making/cascading decisions raises record-keeping concerns, too. That's probably why the policy is to use them only in limited circumstances.
They couldn't even use it to recap that meeting based on the subject matter. It is more "Hey JD, I have something to talk to you about. Are you near a high level?" That is the type of message you can send on Signal. If he responded, "I am free at noon." That is giving his schedule a bit and so would be sensitive but it isn't classified info.

They messed up. I think Hegseth should at least be reprimanded and Waltz should probably be bounced.

IUWBB over UWash

I think coach has been great for the last decade.
But she's seen these teams that our real contenders for a title..
And Indiana is stuck in gear...Meaning Good enough..Is not good enough !
Only problem is..I'm not sure Bloomington is that.. I must go there destination....
Still lots lots of positivity going forward with this program..👍
Just add another Mckenzie Holmes sprinkle in a Ali Patburg and a Grace Berger and all is well .

Atlantic just released all the texts this a.m. and it is not good

I will limit this to Hegseth as he is squarely in an area I can speak specifically about. Every DoD civilian employee is required to complete training on a yearly basis as to handling of different types of classified information, from CUI all the way up to PPI. All of those are considered sensitive and would run the gamut from your boss's phone number (PII) up to state secrets. Government phones come with the same texting ability as the phone in your hand. What they are saying is not to use iPhone messenger, use the signal app if you are having any discussions. Sensitive would include sharing the direct contact information of a base commander. Things that are publically available can be considered sensitive when it is being passed from one government worker to another.

Hegsett is a former officer and has likely had an even more in depth briefing than a typical DoD civilian. He absolutely knows that you CANNOT transmit the information he did over Signal or any other off the shelf app out there. @Aloha Hoosier is 100% accurate in his description of the different methods they have available to have this level of discussion. Giving times, type of aircraft, target data, etc. before an attack increases the risk involved for our service members. This was an absolute shit show of a **** up on Hegseth's part. He has to be the example to the people he leads and every single one of them knows that there was no way in hell he didn't know he was in the wrong sharing that data. It doesn't matter one damn bit what CISA has to say because DoD is very clear on the rules, he would be facing termination, fines, and potentially jail if he wasn't a political appointee. The political operatives in both parties have gotten really loose with INFOSEC and it needs to stop. What Hegseth shared could literally get people killed.

So I won't be as nice. Conservatives, there is no ifs, ands, or buts around this. They ****ed up. They need to issue their mea culpas. They need to stop using these apps to try and skirt FOIA and Presidential Record keeping laws. There isn't a needle to thread here.
Hegseth claiming what he posted is unclassified is a lie. Everyone in DoD knows their boss is a liar. The CENTCOM four star commander knows his immediate boss is a liar and he’s probably mad enough to eat nails over this.
  • Like
Reactions: swman

Purdue and Kentucky in Indianapolis

How was it valid to claim that McNeese sucks? They beat Clemson, the #5 seed in the region. If anything, that suggests that McNeese was under-seeded. Remember, Clemson was in the E8 last year and tied for 2nd in the ACC this year. That hardly suggests that McNeese beat a bad team. If anything, the results demonstrate that the Committee should have ranked McNeese higher than they did.
is valid to claim you suck
  • Haha
Reactions: kkott

Atlantic just released all the texts this a.m. and it is not good

Karoline Leavitt: The “Signal Hoax” is all Jeffrey Goldberg’s fault.
These people must want this shit to stay in the news. They attacked the guy so he said screw it and released more info. All they had to do was take responsibility…people are forgiving in most instances. Get the facts out fast for all to see. Quit being cowards.

Josh Dix rated ahead of Tucker and Reneau?

More guys than not have "blossomed" after leaving Woodson's IU program.

I obviously have no basis for this assertion, other than watching the games, and a handful of what I think are pretty credible accounts on how Woodson coaches the team on a daily basis... But I can't help but come back to what I believe to be true... Woodson spent very, very little time teaching his players how to play basketball the "right way". Rather, he spent most of his time on plays, principles, talking down to them about being "better"...

I use my own AJ Guyton experience as a potential example for a guy like Mgbako, and how he looked to everyone in an IU uniform.

I played in the IU recruits barnstorming tour AJ's year. Mike Lewis, Jason Collier, Luke Jimenez, ARE, etc... Practiced against them a lot in that summer, played games against them... And me being an enormous IU fan, I came away from that summer thoroughly unimpressed with Guyton as a prospect. What I saw was a disinterested, undisciplined, very skilled player. Didn't have the benefit of social media, to see how good he was in HS. But Lewis, Collier obviously, even Jimenez, were MUCH more impressive to me, at the time.

Knowing what I know now...I was just seeing "open gym" AJ. Not what a real game situation AJ would be...not what Bob Knight coached AJ would be...obviously.

I think Mack, under Woodson, was more often than not, just "Open gym Mack"... because that's basically how Woodson coached him. If he goes to a coach and program that will demand he does the fundamental things, better... we'll see a completely different Mack next year. And at which point, with his size and shooting abilities, I wouldn't say making an NBA team is out of the question some day.
a guy like tucker I could agree with you on, I think MM just lacks the athleticism to ever play in the NBA level. in some ways we were a very talented team this year in other ways you break them down individually a lot of the guys had major flaws.

Banks and Gunn put up good numbers this year, but on bad teams or in a bad conference I don't think either one of them would have contributed at IU this past season.

Reneau, MM, Rice, Carlyse and possibly Cupps are major d1 starter type talents. will be very interesting to follow how they do at their new destinations. We may say damn Woodson screwed up with these guys or we may say damn Woodson did a decent job with this bunch.

At the end of day, it was Woodson's roster and being a bubble team is not acceptable.

Atlantic just released all the texts this a.m. and it is not good

But the language they use -- "sensitive information" -- does clearly imply official government business...be it the Department of the Interior or otherwise. As I said, I don't think that anybody would consider cookie recipes and T-ball schedules to be sensitive.
I will limit this to Hegseth as he is squarely in an area I can speak specifically about. Every DoD civilian employee is required to complete training on a yearly basis as to handling of different types of classified information, from CUI all the way up to Top Secret. All of those are considered sensitive and would run the gamut from your boss's phone number (PII) up to state secrets. Government phones come with the same texting ability as the phone in your hand. What they are saying is not to use iPhone messenger, use the signal app if you are having any discussions. Sensitive would include sharing the direct contact information of a base commander. Things that are publically available can be considered sensitive when it is being passed from one government worker to another.

Hegsett is a former officer and has likely had an even more in depth briefing than a typical DoD civilian. He absolutely knows that you CANNOT transmit the information he did over Signal or any other off the shelf app out there. @Aloha Hoosier is 100% accurate in his description of the different methods they have available to have this level of discussion. Giving times, type of aircraft, target data, etc. before an attack increases the risk involved for our service members. This was an absolute shit show of a **** up on Hegseth's part. He has to be the example to the people he leads and every single one of them knows that there was no way in hell he didn't know he was in the wrong sharing that data. It doesn't matter one damn bit what CISA has to say because DoD is very clear on the rules, he would be facing termination, fines, and potentially jail if he wasn't a political appointee. The political operatives in both parties have gotten really loose with INFOSEC and it needs to stop. What Hegseth shared could literally get people killed.

So I won't be as nice. Conservatives, there is no ifs, ands, or buts around this. They ****ed up. They need to issue their mea culpas. They need to stop using these apps to try and skirt FOIA and Presidential Record keeping laws. There isn't a needle to thread here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT