Unbelievable
- Thread starter dbmhoosier
- Start date
It would really behoove you to stop being arrogant when you're also being stupid.
What post? I didn't see it?
Sorry I don't follow you around like you follow me around.
F*ck off, DANC. I responded directly to your question, don't get dismissive like you are too good to read answers to questions you post. I'm out.
As usual, you were caught in a lie and now you're leaving in a huff. You never cited the actual law in this thread and I wasted 10 minutes going back over it to make sure.
Fvck off youself.
I literally cited the US code for you. Read the f*cking thread you stupid f*cking idiot.
Oh, and I'm not leaving in a huff. I'm leaving this conversation because if I keep talking to you, I'm going to ban a paying member, and then you'll have to wait to beg stoll to let you back in. Let's see if he overturns my banning decisions the way I don't overturn his many banning decisions.
Post #81 in this thread.
Unbelievable
Where in the law does it say you can't do it in a 90 day quiet period? 52 US 20507(c)(2)
indiana.forums.rivals.com
I can't even. Maybe if just once he'd come back and admit he was wrong.Post #81 in this thread.
Unbelievable
Where in the law does it say you can't do it in a 90 day quiet period? 52 US 20507(c)(2)
I see 30 days - I don't see 90, dumb mothervcker.
EDIT: I do see 90 days, but it's regarding SYSTEMIC removal. This process was not systemic, dumbass.
"
(A)
A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
I didn't see the post. But you haven't proved shit, you fake blowhard.
I'm honored you'd put me in the same category as CoH, who owns you on this board.
Try reading for a change.
I see 30 days - I don't see 90, dumb mothervcker.
Your edit should be "I see now, I admit I was wrong all along." But it isn't, because you're an arrogant ass.
I said I didn't see it. So sorry. But you and Mark are still wrong about the 90 days. Because you cannot admit you're wrong.
What do you think would make it illegal? And what does “barely legal” mean (in this context, Aloha…in this context)?
Thank you for continuing to make a fool of yourself. Your presence here makes the rest of us look smarter.
The judge must be too then, since that is the basis for his ruling. You and COH should arrange for Trump to appoint you to the bench.
The world would be a far better place.
We're talking one judge, Mark. There is a problem when a judge - not a court - can stop the state from performing its legal duties. Especially where there is a process to correct any errors.
Soon my friend. It won't matter what these crazy Marxists believe much longer. We're winning so big.
Man I am glad you don’t have to call me an arrogant ass now that I’ve become the nicer me. 😂
I see 30 days - I don't see 90, dumb mothervcker.
EDIT: I do see 90 days, but it's regarding SYSTEMIC removal. This process was not systemic, dumbass.
"
(A)
A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
What is missing for it to be systemic? A quick look at definitions and several say it is "according to a plan". Here are two at the top of my search:
done or acting according to a fixed plan or system; methodical.
Systematic describes something that is planned out and careful. In your systematic search for your mother's car keys, you start in one room, looking everywhere from bottom to top before moving to the next room. Use the adjective systematic to describe things that are orderly and efficient.
You are arrogant, stupid, and a serial liar. That makes you a tremendously obnoxious and worthless poster.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Game Preview: Indiana vs. Louisville - notes, storylines, TV
- Latest: ZachBrowning