Our AI Future
- By larsIU
- The Water Cooler
- 6 Replies
I'm sure somebody said something nice about him. Clearly. That's all it takes. Ask Elon.Would he front-run something like that?
I'm sure somebody said something nice about him. Clearly. That's all it takes. Ask Elon.Would he front-run something like that?
Because he's a vindictive and childish asshole, that's why.Why would he remove Bolton’s SS detail? Don’t the Iranians want to kill him?
I heard his nickname is the Elephant ManLana Del Ray married a guy who hunts alligators for a living. Lived in a trailer I believe.
You spelled Mexico wrong.China makes the fentanyl that kills millions of Americans.
What does Musk think about Altman being part of this venture? My understanding is Musk hates OpenAI and Altman.
China makes the fentanyl that kills millions of Americans.It's not me. The law defines an enemy as someone "engaged in hostilities" with us. That might be someone Congress declares war on, it might be someone who attacks us. But it's not just someone competing with us, even dirty. ISIS is an enemy. China is an adversary.
Even if China were an enemy, Milley didn't give them aid and comfort, so it's a moot point.
Yeah, I'd probably go Gazelle. Or.....(rubs hands)Not sure I’d wear them but I do like them. Kind of like adidas campus
Howard did not author the citizenship clause. I believe it was written by Benjamin Wade. See Wade's comments at the link below.Well, here's the quote that, to me, calls it into question. It's from Sen. Jacob Howard, who authored the Citizenship Clause.
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.There are a couple ways to read that rather sloppy sentence. Was Howard intending to exclude only those children born to foreign diplomats? Or was he intending to exclude all children born to foreigners -- including those who are foreign diplomats?
Obviously, the question comes down to what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means in this context. And that was true in May 1866 when the Senate was debating this and it's true now.
It's not me. The law defines an enemy as someone "engaged in hostilities" with us. That might be someone Congress declares war on, it might be someone who attacks us. But it's not just someone competing with us, even dirty. ISIS is an enemy. China is an adversary.I would consider someone that steals from our businesses, hacks our financial & government institutions including our military, plants seeds to destroy our infrastructure, floods our market with deadly drugs, threatens to invade allies, sends spy balloons into our airspace, meddles in our elections, (should I go on?) our enemy, but you think they have to lob a missile, huh? 🙄. I guess the Soviet Union wasn’t our enemy either?
Speical order my friend. They do cost more.I don’t think Nike has any all-white dunks.
Yes, I believe he is. We knew each other from the dog park and he quit coming when he moved, as far as I can tell. But no listings for him in obituaries.Is Cosmic still with us? I was thinking you knew him personally
Why would he remove Bolton’s SS detail? Don’t the Iranians want to kill him?
Yes we’ve known that. The Vindmans are pissed too and very scared right now.
Joe, you jumped the shark on this post.....better back up the train...I'm seeing a reoccurring theme with Crazy. Is she simply pissed because she has never been asked for sexual favors? Like EVER asked? Maybe she's just wanting some hotdawg? I mean er'body needs a release once in a while, right? Maybe Ohio guy, or Mark could help to shut her up for a bit? Mark, take one for the team damnit!
![]()
I don’t think Nike has any all-white dunks.Nike Air Force Ones
Nike Dunks
They are (probably) Nikes
![]()
Pastor. As a man of the cloth I would like your opinion on something in which you are a subject matter expert.
What are your thoughts on the below sermon?
Login to view embedded media
Episcopalians amiright?
It just sucks if you go back to 2007 how good Sampson had us..His offense when he first arrived and for that era was a fun offense to watch. Then in perfect Crean fashion he became infatuated with position-less basketball without having multi position players.. Then the switching defenses in middle of possessions.
Always looking for a gimmick. Didn't have a consistent offensive or defensive philosophy. Which is one reason why he was an inconsistent coach...
This is real.You really can't be dumb enough to think that's real. Not even a good parody