It was negated by Guilfoyle, who looks like that record Cappie pic somebody posted the other day, if you had run over the fish few times with a mulching mower
Trump/Vance 2024
- Thread starter dbmhoosier
- Start date
She was on when I went to bed. She's horrifying.
Plenty of places where Vance has mentioned him.
But he's just one of several postliberals /new right / alt right that seem to influence Vance's philosophy.
I wouldn't really say Babe (although very pretty), but 100% take home to Mom, Have a wonderful life for a few years and then give her a house as you get too comfortable and screw the whole thing up.
Elon supposedly speaking tonight. The Hulk will speak right before Trump.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Do they have Hercules on the docket? Sorbo is always hilarious when he spews politics.
It should be noted that Trump ran on reinvigorating the rust belt in 2016 as well but other than toting a couple new factory openings, I don’t think there were huge tangible results during his term.
Bottom line. Those good paying factory jobs are not coming back en masse without full government control of the means of production. It’s mostly lip service, which is nothing new from either party.
Yale law. Litigator. Awful
You said you were going to be home by ten.
No I said midnight
I have it in my notes
I don’t know
Where were you
just went to chop house
Nowhere else
No
Phone tracker says downtown
Bitch
What’s the plan for the weekend.
I have a tournament
Seriously? When.
It’s fri night through Sunday night. Depends on how we do
Do you remember in law school. You talked about being a senator one day. Or maybe even president. Bc you wanted to help people
In your link Yarvin said our democracy denigrated into a corrupt oligarchy run by elites. Is there any doubt that there is substantial truth in that? Look how Congress passes legislation if you doubt the point. Money and power control instead of debate and compromise. Important bills are crammed with special perks which are the product of money, special interests and influence peddling.
Vance is a consequential choice because he sees what needs to be seen and addresses it. I don’t think this is new conservatism but instead is pulling conservatism back from the model that has developed in the recent past. Politics, including conservatism, needs to pull back from considering what is beneficial to the money and power in politics and focus, at least in part, on those without money and power.
Established politics of all stripes brought economic policy and trade agreements that left many Americans in the dust, by outsourcing jobs overseas, unfair trade agreements ,hollowing out our manufacturing base, and encouraging skilled and unskilled immigration to provide labor at lower costs. Conservatives supported this in the name of “free markets”. As Vance clearly noted, free markets don’t mean squat to those In small town America who can barely pay for food, shelter, clothes, transportation, and health care with a single paycheck. All of this is overlaid with addictions and drug use which soak up much cash in addition to the social problems.The Democrats want to fix this with more subsidies, more economic controls, more regulations, counterproductive green hogwash, in other words more government. Trump and Vance have a different idea— build the economies of rural America. Trump started with the USMCA, but there is a lot to do. The first thing is to recognize the problem.
Hey, CoH. I hope you saved your "Trump/Pence" signs. They're still good. All you need to do is change two letters.
Elon musk and hulk hogan is a rock star combo. I like when hogan gets dressed up but still wears his head rag. All that money and he could have just gotten hair sewn in. He was obviously conscious of his loss. Very strange.
Why you want to squish everything like this under the definition of conservatism is again puzzling to me.
Trump and Vance wanting to “build the economies of rural America” via govt policy IS “more government,” by the way. Tariffs, for example, aren’t zero govt.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
I take it you don't work in Corporate america. I am not putting photos of coworkers on the net. Just taking the photo is probably in the harassment 101 portion of yearly compliance training. A couple of them have become good friends. So fo! If you prefer, I'll scour the internet for photos and put their pictures here and say they are co-workers. I can join the fake news craze.
Tell us you have your own business without telling us you have your own business 🤣🤣
I don’t think tariffs are inherently liberal or conservative. Conservatives resist government control and planning because both of those inhibit individual control and planning. Tariffs may or may not.
Anyway . . . Economics and politics can never be ideologically pure.
The immigration thing is a disaster. when these guys get in office tightened border policies are great but are we going to see Black vans of feds scouring the streets to find immigrants to deport. What could go wrong?
Yeah, I don’t care where you get the photos.
"Vance is a consequential choice because he sees what needs to be seen and addresses it."
Well here's a ringing endorsement from someone else who echos your opinion and is a huge Vance fan...
“He’s in favor of peace, he’s in favor of ending the assistance that’s being provided [to Ukraine], and we can only welcome that because that’s what we need – to stop pumping Ukraine full of weapons, and then the war will end.”
I'll let people take a stab at guessing who is praising ol' JD here. Anyone want to hazard a guess? (no cheating)...
As for all of your musings about Trump/Vance prioritizing"rural America", some of the provisions in Project 2025 have very negative ramifications for rural citizens. Esp family farms...
Project 2025 to rural America: Let them eat cake (without a nutrition label) • Arkansas Advocate
These proposals explicitly advise that rural communities can expect “second class,” maybe just “third class,” treatment.
arkansasadvocate.com
Pathetic post."Vance is a consequential choice because he sees what needs to be seen and addresses it."
Well here's a ringing endorsement from someone else who echos your opinion and is a huge Vance fan...
“He’s in favor of peace, he’s in favor of ending the assistance that’s being provided [to Ukraine], and we can only welcome that because that’s what we need – to stop pumping Ukraine full of weapons, and then the war will end.”
I'll let people take a stab at guessing who is praising ol' JD here. Anyone want to hazard a guess? (no cheating)...
As for all of your musings about Trump/Vance prioritizing"rural America", some of the provisions in Project 2025 have very negative ramifications for rural citizens. Esp family farms...
Project 2025 to rural America: Let them eat cake (without a nutrition label) • Arkansas Advocate
These proposals explicitly advise that rural communities can expect “second class,” maybe just “third class,” treatment.
I don’t give a damn who says what. A worthwhile point is a worthwhile point. Period.
I didn’t comment on Ukraine.
I don’t give a damn about Project 2025 either. If I agree with some or any of it, I might say so.
Vance was not in my top 3 for VP. But that doesn’t disqualify him from making valid points.
Like Kamala calling Joe a racist and then signing on as VP
I wouldn't have expected Youngkin to be very excited after he lost our as VP.
I still think he'd be a better VP pick, but JD came off pretty well in his speech last night. He has a compelling personal story and I like his wife - not in a hot way, but she seems very grounded and from a solid family.
SC, why do you say Dems are communists and not socialists?
Do you think they are the same?
At the convention stage of an election both Trump and Biden will be focused on winning the election.
IMO the selection of Vance and rhetoric about rebuilding small towns is primarily to put the electoral votes of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michian, Wisconsin, and maybe Minnesota in the Trump win column.
Does anyone really believe Trump or anyone else can somehow alter the factors which have the economic demise of the rust belt small towns? Heck, I read a book predicting this some sixty years ago and it happened. Gradually but surely.
