Twitter? You think Twitter is sitting in the jury box hearing all the evidence? You guys coninually post stupid claims from half-twits who just take the view that anyone who opposes Trump is a "leftist".
The FBI has always been full of Republicans. Mueller is a Republican, Weissman was appointed assistant and then chief director of the FBI's Enron task force by George Bush. The other reason Mueller chose Weissman as a key cog in the investigation into Russian influence in the 2016 (besides his FBI experience) is that Weissman was very involved in prosecuting organized crime figures.
While at the EDNY, he headed up cases vs the Gambino, Columbo and Genovese crime families. So Mueller likely felt Weissman's previous crime family experience would fit right in with an investigation of Trump.
I guess to morons on Twitter that makes him a "leftist"? The point is that whatever you think of him for going after your idol Trump (and especially Manafort), his grasp of what it takes to be able to determine whether testimony benefited the Prosecution or not is based on pretty unasailable. personal experience in thousands of prosecutions.
But you go on giving credence to nonsense from half T wits like "Lori Mills", "Matrix Forest" and "Alex Brusewitz" and wonder why you always end up wrong. Why you lose elections, why your predictions always turn up wrong, and why you persist in that kind of nonsense...
Alex Brusewitz is a genius. I guess he thinks the Prosecution is somehow unaware of Stormy's earlier claim or the fact that she changed her mind? No doubt this will catch the prosecution completely off guard, since among other facts Stormy only discusses it in her book/movie for anyone to see...