I meant Mark Cuban no comparison to trump. None.
Look him up, follow him on twitter. Watch what he did to help field-manage the problems it the PPP loan forgiveness program.
We need a third party cleansed of the hypocritical stench currently interwoven into the two shitholes we have.
I'm not interested in Cuban. That's why I asked why you think he's perfect.
Bill Gates has done more, particularly in the field of medicine so why not Gates for president?
Daniel Snyder came into money the same way Cuban did, maybe Snyder should consider it.
Bezos is trying to own the world, why not let him try being president?
Look I was all over Perot in 92. He spoke my language. Was a third party self made billionaire but more importantly he actually formed a third party cleansed of the hypocritical stench at the time.
He would have been a f#$king disaster in hindsight.
Hell he couldn't take the public scrutiny of his campaign and flaked out halfway through it when he had momentum.
For these guys it seems it's more about the glorification based on a very simple and vague political platform.
The critical failure to these outsiders is that to be successful, they have to actually use political skills...which means work with a wide array of strong personalities where in this case are 100% against you since you just strolled in with zero political relationships built. Compare that to starting their own business and getting their way with little resistance.
It's a totally different world of influence. Entrepreneurs are naturally entrepreneurs because they don't want to deal with politics.
Koch ran in the 70's. Perot in the 90's. Forbes ran in the 00's.
Billionaire candidates running as an outsider are not new. All were eventually seen as loonies. Only one got elected and he's likely to go down in history as the worst president of all time.
Like I said, if Cuban wants to go into politics then run for mayor, senator or governor and see if he likes it and is good at it.
Of course that wouldn't interest him.