Deep thoughts with IU_Hickory to leave you for the night. Now playing Delilah on the easy listening station. And remember as long as IU_Hickory is out there you can't be the dumbest person on earth!
Um no. Academia leans left. Journalism schools lean left. They graduate more students who lean left who occupy houses that lean left.
An education would do wonders for your endless stupidity.
I don't know how or where you found this board but you have single-handedly made it appreciably worse.
There isn't a single thing you post about with knowledge. Not one.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Lol how do you research it if you don't trust any sources? Lmao. You witness everything you learn first hand I am sure.
Are you really this dense? If you are, I will have to send you a private message to explain it. If you’re not, and just being a wise guy, then you know you have to critically think for yourself. At some point you realize you won’t know if you’re 100% accurate or not.
One final point to illustrate the stupidity of your comment. Do you believe the “sources” you’re listening to that apparently lets you know what you think, saw what they are reporting first hand? Or did they investigate? Do you think they formed an opinion? Do you think their editor ever over rules what they want to report? Try to actually think for yourself for once, it can be a lot of fun!!
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
My point was unless you witness something for yourself, you are still believing another source.
I didn't realize that simple concept was so hard for you to grasp.
Do you think your sources witness everything first hand? Time to think for yourself!!
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
I do think for myself. But you can stop acting like your sources are any different than our sources.
But then you wouldn't be a conservative if you weren't a hypocrite
So are you telling me “you let other decide for you” what is true and not? That’s called being a sheep. It’s really kind of sad you can’t grasp the simple concept of thinking for yourself. Maybe some day you will pull your head out of your back side and realize you have a brain and instead of listening to people paid millions to give the opinion of the network to maximize a profit for the “for profit” media company, you might actually break down the facts as presented to you and find consistencies in the story and decide what you believe is true and what isn’t.
But I guess I should expect nothing else from a person named noodle.
No “journalists” are on the left. The truth is there are very few journalists left in the world in the true sense of what the word means. 99% of them are doing opinion shows. These so called journalists are without a doubt “on the left”.
Just told Zebra we need a back-channel that can ratchet this down a little.
Now figure out a way that Putin will save enough face to not nuke anybody, and let him live a Gollum-life alone in Russia, and start up the arms race again.
I can't follow your post. On the one hand, you argue that there are few true journalists, and I don't disagree with that. But you then claim that 99% of the few remaining journalists are doing opinion shows. If they're doing opinion shows, they're not journalists.
So it appears that what you're really talking about are political pundits with influence. If you're arguing that 99% of them are on the left, that's just nonsense. Ever listen to AM talk radio? What about some of the most popular podcasters? Or how about the most-watched cable news channel, including the most-watched opinion host on cable - - you know, the pro-Putin mouth-breather who always looks confused?
The right (including the extreme right) are very well represented in media.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
This thought process that media is liberal is crazy. Fox News, News max, oann, most radio hosts, etc. Conservative nuts are well represented in media
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
I’m a teddy bear...... and a pushover. Just ask my girls. Guess it depends on the circumstances.
But Nancy says refusing to accept ballot harvesting suppresses voters …
And Every state should have ballot drop boxes …
And No voter identification should be required …
In H.B. 1
As long as the ballot boxes aren’t stuffed in the voting precincts … it must be OK.
I'm not taking any chances. It's always the quiet ones...
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Here is another magnet for the DPH, the Democratic Party of Hate.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
That is probably run by Trump lol. I am sure a lot of trumpsters would like to cuddle with their trumpy bearHere is another magnet for the DPH, the Democratic Party of Hate.
I find an obvious misspelling error a lot less of an issue than people that struggle with the proper use of the 3 twos, the Yours and the theres (best way to state it not looking for a critique, you know what I mean) along with plurality. I was merely pointing out to you that you do it occasionally too. Using women as a singular woman drives me nuts. You be you, the point was it comes from both sides, politics don't = grammar
Let’s See. H R 1 text is at https://legiscan.com/US/text/HB1/id/2331257/US_Congress-2021-HB1-Engrossed.pdf
Yes there is some exaggeration in the exact language above
There are provisions for ballot harvesting, drop boxes, and relaxation of identification requirements in HR 1
I think it is clear Nancy Pelosi has stated that representatives against HR 1 are suppressing voters.
Ballot Harvesting
- HR 1 P.199 l.24 explicitly allows 3rd persons to collect an unlimited number of ballots and submit them to election officials
- Paid (salaried) activists would be permitted to collect such ballots as long as their compensation were not based on the number of ballots collected on the behalf of others.
- HR 1 P.194 l.1: Requires states to send absentee ballot applications by mail to every registered voter 60 days in advance of the (Federal) election.
- HR 1 P.56 l.6: Requires all public facing state agencies to offer voter registration services to all clients at the time of service.
Drop Boxes
- HR 1 P.199 l.20: States are allowed, but not required, to provide drop boxes for the collection of ballots.
- HR 1 P.271 l.17: Requires States to provide secured drop boxes, (24/7 P.274 l.20) where an individual may drop off (an unlimited number of) ballots.
- HR 1 P.277 l.10 prohibits states from barring curbside voting.
Voter Identification
- HR 1 P.186 l.11: States are prohibited from defining application rules, must implement a no excuse application policy.
- HR 1 P.186 l.18: States are prohibited from requiring identification (other than a signature) to apply for an absentee ballot.
- HR 1 P.188 l.18, P.190 l.5: Election officials are required to allow voters to cure missing and mismatched signatures, within ten days of such discoveries.
- HR 1 P.56 l.6: Requires all public facing state agencies to offer voter registration services to all clients at the time of service. But, does not appear to demand states secure evidence of positive identification. (eg. the last 4 digits of a client’s SSN or signature are transmitted only if the client provided them).
I’m not Conservative nor am I Liberal. I’m not acting like I even have sources dumba$$!! Try and read. I try to put together the truth base on reasoning from within my own brain. Got it ScareCrow?!?
Whether it or not Trump boned Stormy Daniels is irrelevant. Tell me exactly why that was a story worth covering? To get him to lie? News Flash EVERY POLITICIAN IN THE HISTORY OF PLANET EARTH HAS LIED.
It all happened before he was a politician and in the history of our great country, no President has had to endure other politicians seeking out a crime on them before. It’s been endless for Trump. And what have they found? He screwed a porn star when he was younger……Ok you’re right…now what? If they’d have found anything else that was truthful and could be prosecuted, I can guarantee you they would have.
You’re assuming the so called Conservative opinion shows are actually Conservative. Again, you would have to think for yourself in order to understand. But just to clarify…Networks and newspapers 99% left. Opinion shows 50-50 at best for what you’re calling a Conservative. Real Conservatives might be 5%. My apologies. I was off 4%.
Zeke is jealous for starters and I agree whatever he did before politics between two consenting adults is irrelevant.
Whether it or not Trump boned Stormy Daniels is irrelevant. Tell me exactly why that was a story worth covering? To get him to lie? News Flash EVERY POLITICIAN IN THE HISTORY OF PLANET EARTH HAS LIED.
It all happened before he was a politician and in the history of our great country, no President has had to endure other politicians seeking out a crime on them before. It’s been endless for Trump. And what have they found? He screwed a porn star when he was younger……Ok you’re right…now what? If they’d have found anything else that was truthful and could be prosecuted, I can guarantee you they would have. And correct me if I’m wrong, the proof in a court of law has never been presented to the public?
He gave the money to his attorney. It may be a loop hole but let’s be serious here, WTF was she all of the sudden telling everyone? Money? Black mail? Paid by someone else? She didn’t just decide to tell everyone because of her high character and morals. Her lack of character (I know it’s based on her being a porn star, forgive my close mindedness)is the only fact we know for sure.He gave her money simply because he is just a caring guy and knew she needed it
So Whether or not Trump boned Stormy Daniels is irrelevant. Tell me exactly why that was a story worth covering? To get him to lie?
And He had “relations” with Ms Daniels long before he was a politician. There is no concrete proof he paid her off. Since it’s run the media cycle, nobody cares (like you all pretended) because it doesn’t help you politically and there is nothing there. So again why was this a story? Did he not cut the crusts off his bread at home when he promised he would too?
It would of helped if conservatives weren't trying to be the party of morals for decades.
Family first is the current iteration.
Particularly the evangelical wing of the republican party has been the ones who have been the moral police over the decades.
So when the party of 'holier than thou morality' goes 100% all in on a guy that is, umm, the opposite of that stance you're going to get some slack and not taken seriously.
Trump was busted banging a porn star while his wife was preggo with Baron.
That's not very Christian living or family first.
All irrelevant to my point. But if you want me to explain what happened, here goes. Most of the people you’re saying are Holier than thou don’t really believe nor portray themselves that way. In other words, Bob from the Midwest just wants to keep his daughter from thinking it’s ok to actually be the next Stormy Daniels. Which is why they prefer the Religious candidates. Let’s not get into Religion and all of that because we probably agree on 98% of morals whether we’re highly Religious or Atheist (which btw is also a Religion By definition). The political Religious are FAR from the same people as the Bob’s from the Midwest. But the Bob’s need someone to represent them so they vote. It turns out many “Religious” politicians aren’t. The media blasts them and their opponents paint all Religious people with the same brush.
Along comes Trump, (who is actually more moral than he gets credit for in many areas of his life) who has many human ,flaws as we all do, he doesn’t proclaim to be overly Religious but does just enough of the Political stuff to please the base. He makes it vague enough so the media doesn’t have a lot to grab on to , the rest of his political stances align very well with the right and voila, he has a formula to get on the Republican ticket.
it turns out he’s very effective at getting things accomplished, the Bobs from the Midwest finally have a voice and the left goes insane because not only can’t they take it, they’re scared sh!tless because he’s beating them ALL. THe Bobs finally realize the only way to get what they want, which is a foundation of morality and a country that allows for Freedom and an opportunity to work hard, not make excuses and you will likely succeed, is to do what the left has been doing for a LONG LONG time. You don’t always have to agree with 100% of everything in regards to morals that your politician believes but if what he’s doing will get ultimately get you back to what you want, then the END WILL JUSTIFY THE MEANS!!! You picking up what I’m setting down Mr Olinsky?
On a separate note, most people of Religion know they aren’t perfect but they strive to be better every day. The only way to get there is by having a strong moral foundation knowing you will fail at times. Forgive yourself and others and don’t judge people in most instances and you’ll be alright. Peace and good night, I’m done responding.
How do you differentiate between a "so-called conservative opinion show" and an "actual conservative opinion show" or "real conservatives" versus "what I'm calling a conservative?" And where are you pulling these percentages from?
Seriously, I have no idea what the fvck you're talking about and it's not because I'm unable to think for myself. Are you boozed up? Your writing is incoherent.
No thinking for yourself was gone long ago Goat I have no clue what you are trying to say but do carry on
It’s because you can’t think outside of what your fvcking spoon fed d!ckhe&d. You’re an absolute moron and should be embarrassed to call yourself a human. Try this, I know it’s hard because you will have to look something up, take a look at how many opinion pundits used to be either highly conservative or highly liberal….it’s quite a few. MOST OF THEM are all in it for the money. So I listen and I decide based on the consistency of their opinion if they are a “real conservative “ or not. There you go sweet cheeks, it’s how smart people think for themselves!!
