Aren't you just so cute! Donny in his diaper , what grade do you actually teach? Preschool doesn't really count. Also plenty of Biden on video creeping on young girls that obviously don't like it.
I think we have several true Trumpsters here, but I've thought Lucy was a lib playing a cartoon version of a conservative from the start. He/she has slipped up occasionally to convince me. I have no idea which liberal he is though. I don't have the time to do the detective work.
Aloha, good going. You being on to Lucy reminds of how the Great Rockfish once described me.
Old and naive.
Why do you think the poster is new? You don't recognize the telltale signs on that one?Actually it's a journalism school. The lion's share of journalists and journalism schools are left biased. They used to own the Saint Pete Times and now own Tampa Bay Times - current incarnation. You don't read ANYTHING that doesn't have a left bias. That the new poster is new makes me have 100 % more faith in him than ANYTHING you post with your hyper partisan bullshit. What's the latest readings from Republicans R Evil? Left wing journalists co-opted your brain.
As for the "content" of your post re some bibliography I don't care. I was commenting on politfact having a bias. I don't think you read anything that doesn't have a bias.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.www.allsides.com
Fact Check Bias Chart & Ratings
The AllSides Fact Check Bias Chart™ reveals the media bias of top fact checkers, such as Snopes, Politifact, FactCheck.org and more.
Welcome back, IGBAT!
It took 2 minutes to say "Trump supporters are a cult"?
It's funny how it's the same small group of Facebook/Twitter people who just always have the scoop of the century. Think of all of the damning voter fraud evidence that's going to come out. Somehow those that know chose Mike Lyndell with this incredible, earth shattering evidence.
SMH
We all know it's human nature to be blinded by personal bias and we all have to be careful to not look for affirmation instead of information.... because the affirmation business is extremely lucrative to those peddling it right now.
In other words, we are all susceptible to misinformation, schemes and scams when we so want to believe it, and scammers know it.
People's bullshit meters have been broken for a while lately.
First question to ask 'how likely is this to be true, really, how likely is this?'
Then ask 'what had to happen for this to be true?'. Is there a somewhat basic logical answer, then it adds credibility. If it's some insanely complicated and elaborate scheme that had to happen then....yeah it's most likely just bullshit.
It's not complicated. Similar to identifying liars. When a person is telling the truth they will in general be quick and concise. A liar will go on and on with some elaborate justification as they try to convince you that they are not lying.
People need to recognize bullshit when they see it because it's going to get worse as flat out doctoring becomes harder to recognize. Soon doctored videos with digitally altered identification marks will be the thing.
It's going to get worse and we are going to be more reliant on our bullshit meters along with reputable sources that we can trust.
In other words, Lord help us.
This is not Tom Cruise, it's an example of a deep fake technology that's getting better every year.
Can you imagine how social media influencers will use this?
Right. The word "darling" was the troubling part of your post.
I've met Zeke. Nice gal. Good people. But I wouldn't want to fvck with her.
Please tell us where the line between the three is and what qualifies you to make it?
My own. I don’t let others tell me what to think. I think for myself. I research it and decide what is true and what is not. And then if there isn’t enough information, I reserve judgement until there is.
Fair enough. What are your go-to sources when you're doing your research? And how are you able to determine what is true and what is not? Serious question. By all appearances we're not on the same page; I'd like to understand how you arrive at the conclusions you do.
Last edited:
You "decide" what is true and what is not? LOL
Sometimes the truth is never discovered in a person's lifetime.
Many times what once appeared to be the truth is later proven wrong or only partially true.
Jimmy Kimmel who got famous wearing blackface and making fun of Malone. His show should move to MSNBC
This here be Karl Malone and whatever else he would say basically buffoning a black man. He should be buried to a stockroom somewhere. He is a person I'd punch in the face , I dont know if he could be a bigger hypocrite. Came to fame on The Man Show with things like that and girls jumping on trampolines. Gets a job he should never have and then after making outrageous amounts of money for a 7 11 clerk ( no offense @UncleMark) ceiling of intelligence is on crying about health insurance for whatever problem his kid had/has. He is actually the picture of liberalism
He's a typical media whore who will take whatever position he needs to take to make money.
I've said many times on here I agree with Carlson on a lot, but some of his positions piss me off, such as now with Ukraine.
But yes, he's out for ratings, just like Bill O'Reilly was. The difference, I think, is that Kimmel was about as politically uncorrect as you can get with the Man Show. And now, he's nothing if not politically correct. Carlson and O'Reilly haven't done the same 180.
However, yes, they're all media whores.
If you like good looking women and want a pretty straight shooting commentator, check out Shannon Bream on Fox. Extremely hot and a pretty good interviewer - I rarely hear her inject her own opinions. Bret Baier, while not a woman and therefore not hot, is a pretty objective reporter also - his show is more news, with little opinion, except the panel he has on, which usually consists of 2 conservatives and 1 lib.
Is he some guy that does black face and parodies African Americans in the name of humor? I really have no idea who this is but sounds like you do?
Checks all the Fox boxes -- pretty and blonde.
Shannon Bream - Google Search
www.google.com
But if you've paid any attention, I have a type. She doesn't fit.
Edit to add: My favorite pretty blonde news gal is Margaret Hoover. She does a Firing Line reboot on PBS. She comes from the right, too.
She, Margaret, may have started right, but she's not now. She is.... fetching, I'll say that.
I don't know that I have a 'type'. I suppose I've gone for the dark haired ones, but probably because I couldn't get the blonds.
Shannon is very religious. Not a negative, necessarily, but more of a challenge.
She's plenty hot, no question. I just prefer my fantasies have at least a teensy bit of plausibility, that's all.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Actually it's a journalism school. The lion's share of journalists and journalism schools are left biased. They used to own the Saint Pete Times and now own Tampa Bay Times - current incarnation. You don't read ANYTHING that doesn't have a left bias. That the new poster is new makes me have 100 % more faith in him than ANYTHING you post with your hyper partisan bullshit. What's the latest readings from Republicans R Evil? Left wing journalists co-opted your brain.
As for the "content" of your post re some bibliography I don't care. I was commenting on politfact having a bias. I don't think you read anything that doesn't have a bias.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
Fact Check Bias Chart & Ratings
The AllSides Fact Check Bias Chart™ reveals the media bias of top fact checkers, such as Snopes, Politifact, FactCheck.org and more.
Hyper partisan bs....pot meet kettle.
Journalists only look left to you because you are so far right. All a matter of perspective I guess
