Here's a summary of the litigation. The opinions are replete with phrases like "strained legal arguments," "the claims are without merit," "an attempt to undermine a democratic election," "no basis in fact and law," "speculative accusations," etc.
Not a single court found merit in any "irregularities" or "anomalies" argument. But you and Danny keep talking statistics, despite the fact that the courts (even Republican judges!!) didn't buy any of it. They didn't buy it because it's all bullshit which is, of course, the essence of the Trump brand.
Danny doesn't get this because, well, he's Danny. You're a lawyer, though, and should know better.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-campaign-lawsuits-election-results-2020-11