I am a bit lost as to the responses in this thread. A person simply stated his/her opinion of an IU player and what he/she (for ease in the rest of this post, I am going to assume it is a him) believes might have motivated a grad transfer QB to come to Indiana. While no one is required to agree with him, why the personal attacks? Is he an IU fan? I don't know and I really don't care. Nothing he has stated should be viewed as anything more than his opinions of players and their abilities. Seems like a football message board is a good place to discuss such things, without folks ratcheting up the side attacks. I will review his posts, but nothing I can remember from his posts are way out in left field. Some do have concerns as to whether Ramsey has the arm to get us wins in more than half of the big ten games. That's a fair concern. You don't have to agree, but it is fair opinion. It is also fair to have the opinion that the graduate transfer would not be at IU unless there were some concerns with existing QBs. Doesn't mean you have to agree with that either, but debate the issue and avoid the name calling and attempts to devalue a poster by challenging his loyalty. Boy this board has changed. It's not a problem for someone to have an opinion that contradicts your own. It's acceptable for folks to not always wear the rose colored glasses. Just make your points as to why someone is, in your opinion, wrong. By the way, anyone who discusses a players ability is not, in my opinion, taking personal shots at the player. It is just his opinion of the talent of an IU player. It's an IU football board, seems a fair place to be able to discuss opinions as to talent levels.