Top secret documents
- Thread starter Marvin the Martian
- Start date
I realize this is humor but hits at why I think if you were spouse of a serving President you shouldn't be eligible to run if there for 2 terms. If we are going to have term limitations that should be a factor. Does anyone really think if either Hillary or Michelle win election that Bill and Barak aren't going to have influence and that Hillary already didnt have a lot when Bill was in office? I know we have had 2 father and sons and one before term limits and some influence but not spouses.Kamalalalal vrs Killery cage match.
Hillary Clinton Boasts Of Having No Classified Documents From Her Time As President
CHAPPAQUA, NY — After revelations that former Presidents and Vice Presidents Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and even Mike Pence had violated federal law by keeping classified documents in their homes, Hillary Clinton took the opportunity to brag that she had kept no classified documents from her time...babylonbee.com
According to one site, 77.5 million decisions to classify information happened in fiscal year 2014. Lord knows how much is done now. And that is just one year. How many people does it take to do this? Color me skeptical, but I don’t believe that many documents each year are a threat to national security. If there are, we shouldn’t be producing those documents that present a threat in the first place.Once you learn government gobbledegook it's clear as a bell.Seriously, classification is a full-time job for a lot of people and they understand this stuff very, very well.
You don't think there would be a lot? We hack phone calls and computers across the world, we have human intel across the world. Even if all it gets us today is Russia's actual oil output, we don't want them to know we've broken that.
You may have gotten your first "like" from me.perhaps Trump also eliminated that requirement just by thinking it so.
This is a spooning moment.
If you are talking about the products of sigint and humint you are likely correct. But I have my doubts that each item is separately decided. I would expect one decision about that years ago.
”It was illegal for him to possess them.” Wrong. Read the law.
Well wall street said...
And then the big $ banks said...
and then K street went all, hell naw...
So then lobbyist said hold my beer
I think that is what IGW will reply anyway.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
You read it, because you're wrong.
Presidential Records (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22)
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 22) § 2201. Definitions § 2202. Ownership of Presidential records § 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records § 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records § 2205. Exceptions to restricted access § 2206. Regulations § 2207. Vice-Presidential records § Note...
www.archives.gov
"Another possibility Rofer pointed to is that Trump could have retained his nuclear “biscuit”, a piece of plastic like a credit card with the identification codes necessary for nuclear launch. Those codes would have been changed however the moment Biden took office at noon on 20 January 2021."
FBI searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home for classified nuclear weapons documents – report
Suspected presence of such files could explain why US attorney general took step of ordering FBI agents into Trump home
When deciding life and death, I have always loved the word "Almost". I always have a way out, if one of my patients die. Well, almost always.
But it always makes one sound like an expert to the laymen. Bravo Captain.
That's the best you can do? You said it was all over the media. You can't even provide one example of an outlet making the claim. Instead all you have is someone tacking it on at the end as one of several possibilities."Another possibility Rofer pointed to is that Trump could have retained his nuclear “biscuit”, a piece of plastic like a credit card with the identification codes necessary for nuclear launch. Those codes would have been changed however the moment Biden took office at noon on 20 January 2021."
FBI searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home for classified nuclear weapons documents – report
Suspected presence of such files could explain why US attorney general took step of ordering FBI agents into Trump homewww.theguardian.com
Maybe try typing it into Twitter. Theres a TON of nuclear code sh!t on Trump. Since you watch systematic propaganda how would you know? A blind squirrel could find this crap.
I was trying to be nice. It’s difficult for me . . .
You get your information from Twitter twits tweeting their ridiculous unsupported opinions?Maybe try typing it into Twitter. Theres a TON of nuclear code sh!t on Trump. Since you watch systematic propaganda how would you know? A blind squirrel could find this crap.
He claimed it was reported all over the media. Idiots on Twitter don't count.Maybe try typing it into Twitter. Theres a TON of nuclear code sh!t on Trump. Since you watch systematic propaganda how would you know? A blind squirrel could find this crap.
And there lies the reason you are so lost...I choose to follow certain journalists so I can see the truth instead of propaganda, which is what you get fed daily, therefore your whacked POV. If you run the search there are several articles about this nonsense. After glancing at this stupid thread, and all the misinformed dolt comments, its time to get it back on track with facts instead of trash. Jeeeez
And you've just confirmed yourself. Congratulations!
Now run along and get your daily dose.
In other words, no credible source reported that the classified Trump documents contained nuclear codes, but some Twitter twits pulled the idea from their bungholes to inform the easily duped Trumpster crowd who inexplicably think it’s some sort of defense for Trump. Got it, thanks for explaining.
Last edited:
Ftw has been on the war path the last few days. Nice to have another soldier in gods army.
Except that many in business and government take Twitter traffic very seriously. It’s so serious that the Twitter itself manipulated postings to favor interests of Biden and The Democrats. It’s so serious that some people are cancelled over Twitter traffic. It’s so serious that the FBI collaborated with Twitter to root out “far right” threats to national security. It’s so serious that the General Counsel for the FBI was promoted to General Counsel for Twitter.
I think Twitter is a cesspool. But many don’t, including many leftists on this forum who frequently comment about how their Twitter feed is blowing up over some something or another something.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Yea, spreading lies about the pandemic that had the potential of convincing people to take higher risks that could lead to death wasn't serious
.Some things might be a little more serious than others.
I'm very sorry that asking twitter to take down hunter dick pics was such a travesty for you. I would have thought they would have had rules against porn anyway.
I showed it was an issue and you weren't paying attention if you didn't hear all kinds of specualtion about him having nuclear codes, nuclear information, etc.
I'm not going to waste time on providing you with readily available information. I pulled that up in one search. I'm sorry if I embarrassed you. Wait - no, I"m not.
Last edited:
Isn't Twitter considered media? Doesn't the media post news reports on the media?
I said the 'media' - not a 'credible source'.
He and goat love to leave themselves an out when they're proven wrong.
It wasn't an issue at all. Baseless speculation about the Trump's classified documents containing nuclear codes among Twitter twits and their easily duped followers, and by you on here, doesn't make a non-issue an issue. I think you know that. Or are you going all in on bad faith argument again?
Trump was more obstinate (shocker). But Biden appears to have been more careless and devious.
Do they cancel each other out?
Do they cancel each other out?
I don't know what you call an 'issue'. I said there was all kinds of speculative talk about the documents - including 'nuclear codes'. I provided an example and you've admitted it was on Twitter.
You should take the L and stop while you're behind.
'Credible source' was your wording. I said it was on the media. Twitter is considered media today.
You can surely follow that.
I don’t either. I never understood why Twitter was taken so seriously by so many people. We had a thread about that a few years ago and many posters actually defended it.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
First off, 2 wrongs shouldn't cancel each other out. This isn't the 2 wrongs make a right situation.
You can argue purposely taking documents and being careless with documents are somewhat comparable (although I think it could be argued that purposely taking is worse) given that both end up with documents being taken/stolen from where they were supposed to be.
However, the part about not cooperating with returning said documents is not at all comparable and where things are very different.
There needs to be repercussions and there needs to be better safeguards to prevent it from happening in the future.
Look why argue with me??? Haven't you learned. Your'e gonna believe your sources, and I'm gonna believe mine. I don't believe anything your sources print and you don't believe mine. Yours have been there for years and are bought and paid for by every Davos attendee and mine are independent truth seekers.
Did you not see the Klaus Schwab attempted interview at Davos. Journalist..."Can I ask you a question" Schwab..."Sure what paper are you from". Journalist "Independent News". Schwab runs away. If it ain't part of the propaganda agenda they are not gonna get trapped with legit questions about what they are pushing.
Did you see the Pfizer CEO when a news source (Not Part Of the Propaganda Agenda) started asking him about side effects from the vaccine including death?????? They banned the video from every social media platform on the planet EXCEPT.....wait for it.....Twitter. Thank you ELON for not backing down from the truth!!!
So you continue on and if it gets out of line again I will back my fellow posters who haven't been swallowed by the systematic propaganda machine. Peace!
