.
And Arkansas could just foul the shit out of us because you know we weren’t making any FTs.
they couldn’t make a lay up anyway, why foul.
.
And Arkansas could just foul the shit out of us because you know we weren’t making any FTs.
This post is silly. Arkansas got 4 points from IU fouling trying to catch up. Everything else being the same except 6 more made FT, IU would-be been up 68-67 at the point they started sending Arkansas to the line at the end.The FT excuse is silly...had we made 6 more to shoot at 80% as a team...we still lose by 1
We have played bad for weeks. Remember the nebraska game at home. This team is not getting better but major rebuilds take a decade I guess.The FT excuse is silly...had we made 6 more to shoot at 80% as a team...we still lose by 1
Not like we lost to Evansville or Utah at home. Go ask UK how they feel/felt.This team has no Alpha! Plus Arkansas shot out their ass!
Not like we lost to Evansville or Utah at home. Go ask UK how they feel/felt.
It’s called college basketball, shit happens
Ugly loss. But still time to make amends.
Oh c’‘mon!!!
I’ve got a suggestion for you:
Keep the “shit happens” excuse on speed dial because you will be using that one a LOT this year. Every game will be “shit happens.”
This isn’t some anomaly. This is bad coaching and bad trends in play about every game since Florida State. Only reason we beat ND is because they have no more than like 6 guys that can play. They are s triage ward.
No development. Dumb play. Terrible fundamentals.
Face the facts: the last 2 coaches IU have had were hired on the basis of a couple flukes in the NCAA tournament.
Oh c’‘mon!!!
I’ve got a suggestion for you:
Keep the “shit happens” excuse on speed dial because you will be using that one a LOT this year. Every game will be “shit happens.”
This isn’t some anomaly. This is bad coaching and bad trends in play about every game since Florida State. Only reason we beat ND is because they have no more than like 6 guys that can play. They are s triage ward.
No development. Dumb play. Terrible fundamentals.
Face the facts: the last 2 coaches IU have had were hired on the basis of a couple flukes in the NCAA tournament.
Settle down.. breathe. This isn’t life or death. Show me even 3 teams in current top 25 who hasn’t lost a shit show game (other than Auburn and SDSU who are undefeated. And don’t say Gonzaga cause they lost to UM team that lost 3/5 last games
Question for you:
Archie has been here for 2.5 years.
What aspects are getting better?
Every team is allowed a shit show.
The difference is that this guy has had several and despite winning some of them, his teams make the same mistakes continuously..
Like I said, keep your “oh well,shit happens” excuse handy because it is happening a whole bunch this year.
The sad truth is that Archie may be worse than Crean and that is saying a lot.
I won’t bother to engage on the results of today. Instead, I’d like to know if you think 2 1/2 years is enough time to infuse a program with the coach’s culture and, if so, what is that culture that Miller has created? When you or a college basketball fan or an opposing coach thinks of IU, what are their impressions? What do you see when you look at the program 2 1/2 years into Miller’s tenure? What do opposing fans, coaches and observers see? What do you think recruits see? What is the undeniable culture, the calling card of the program? And, if you can’t answer that now, when will you be able to?I asked you to show me a top 25 team that hasn’t lost a shit show game.
No matter last year, previous year.
In the here and now. But you can’t, and won’t, and just rip on Archie
Goto UK rivals (before they beat UL). Unbelievably there were tons of die hard KATS who were saying Calipari has lost it. Worst UK team since 2012-13 when they didn’t make the NCAA
CALIPARI IS ONE OF THE BEST COACHES/RECRUITERS EVER in recent modern NCAA basketball.
and yet, since they started 8-3, with two really bad losses at home ( way worse than ARK over IU) they are talking about firing him.
Really?
So go ahead, Fire Archie in your mind.
It’s what feeble minded people do who live and die on EVERY SINGLE GAME
I won’t bother to engage on the results of today. Instead, I’d like to know if you think 2 1/2 years is enough time to infuse a program with the coach’s culture and, if so, what is that culture that Miller has created? When you or a college basketball fan or an opposing coach thinks of IU, what are their impressions? What do you see when you look at the program 2 1/2 years into Miller’s tenure? What do opposing fans, coaches and observers see? What do you think recruits see? What is the undeniable culture, the calling card of the program? And, if you can’t answer that now, when will you be able to?
NOWow... that’s a lot of Qs!!!! I couldn’t even begin to answer all those Qs in one post. I can tell you aren’t happy. You want answers I can’t possibly give in one setting. I’ve shared my opinions many times, feel free to read my past posts. Not sunshine or hater, but def more positive than negative.
Just like I was with IU football when I said 8-9 wins was possible back in September when i was called a CTA apologist (see Big Red Crimson). IU won 8 games in CTA third year.
All I can is this year is still a body of work TBD for IUBB. However I will say the culture for IUBB is pretty damn good when you have a stud like TJD, as a frosh, along with Armaan, clearly buying into CAM system. That cannot be denied.
Try not to lose anymore sleep on this.
Wow... that’s a lot of Qs!!!! I couldn’t even begin to answer all those Qs in one post. I can tell you aren’t happy. You want answers I can’t possibly give in one setting. I’ve shared my opinions many times, feel free to read my past posts. Not sunshine or hater, but def more positive than negative.
Just like I was with IU football when I said 8-9 wins was possible back in September when i was called a CTA apologist (see Big Red Crimson). IU won 8 games in CTA third year.
All I can is this year is still a body of work TBD for IUBB. However I will say the culture for IUBB is pretty damn good when you have a stud like TJD, as a frosh, along with Armaan, clearly buying into CAM system. That cannot be denied.
Try not to lose anymore sleep on this.
NO
Are you really telling people to try not to lose anymore sleep on this? You literally have the last reply to every thread on my computer screen. If anyone needs to relax it's certainly you. Go to bed. I am.
NO
Are you really telling people to try not to lose anymore sleep on this? You literally have the last reply to every thread on my computer screen. If anyone needs to relax it's certainly you. Go to bed. I am.
That wasn’t me. You’re confused defending miller in 30 threads. Go to bed. I trust you’re going to need your energy for big ten play.lol you asked like 15 questions. And your mad I responded?
All I can is this year is still a body of work TBD for IUBB. However I will say the culture for IUBB is pretty damn good when you have a stud like TJD, as a frosh, along with Armaan, clearly buying into CAM system. That cannot be denied.
Honestly, not trolling here. But what is this CAM system you speak of? I’m not sure what we’re trying to do on offense. Please elaborate.
I know I'm not the poster you responded to, but here's my take: 2.5 years is enough time build your program identity and culture, if the players you inherit are apt to buy in to that identity and culture.I won’t bother to engage on the results of today. Instead, I’d like to know if you think 2 1/2 years is enough time to infuse a program with the coach’s culture and, if so, what is that culture that Miller has created? When you or a college basketball fan or an opposing coach thinks of IU, what are their impressions? What do you see when you look at the program 2 1/2 years into Miller’s tenure? What do opposing fans, coaches and observers see? What do you think recruits see? What is the undeniable culture, the calling card of the program? And, if you can’t answer that now, when will you be able to?
You tell me. CAM culture is TJD having one of the best freshman seasons in NCAA. Dare say better than Romeo, who had zippo leadership. TJD is a leader amongst boys he plays against.
Wow... that’s a lot of Qs!!!! I couldn’t even begin to answer all those Qs in one post. I can tell you aren’t happy. You want answers I can’t possibly give in one setting. I’ve shared my opinions many times, feel free to read my past posts. Not sunshine or hater, but def more positive than negative.
Just like I was with IU football when I said 8-9 wins was possible back in September when i was called a CTA apologist (see Big Red Crimson). IU won 8 games in CTA third year.
All I can is this year is still a body of work TBD for IUBB. However I will say the culture for IUBB is pretty damn good when you have a stud like TJD, as a frosh, along with Armaan, clearly buying into CAM system. That cannot be denied.
Try not to lose anymore sleep on this.
IU's defense, by the metrics, has improved each year, including this year, so far. We don't know where it will peak.
His offense remains a concern. The metrics on that suggest that the O has been nearly identical every year
We haven’t necessarily played bad, though. We play bad at times, usually in the second half and don’t snap out of it. We get away from what’s working and when the other team gains momentum and makes 3s we try to match with a 3 and that’s not what we do well. Almost all of our 3 attempts should come when the defense collapses on Trayce and he passes it out to someone that is open, set, and ready to shoot. We gave away this game. It better be the last one.We have played bad for weeks. Remember the nebraska game at home. This team is not getting better but major rebuilds take a decade I guess.
You tell me. CAM culture is TJD having one of the best freshman seasons in NCAA. Dare say better than Romeo, who had zippo leadership. TJD is a leader amongst boys he plays against.
I know I'm not the poster you responded to, but here's my take: 2.5 years is enough time build your program identity and culture, if the players you inherit are apt to buy in to that identity and culture.
Miller didn't inherit that. His culture and identity is focused on defense. That requires consistent effort, discipline, and the ability to defend without fouling. His seniors are: a headcase hero-baller with no discipline and inconsistent effort, and a foul prone big with no lateral quickness. His juniors are: an athletic swing man with no jumper who finally bought in on D this year, and a lithe combo guard who can't handle the ball well enough to play point, and doesn't defend well. Plus, a transfer big who is limited athletically.
Given their unsuitability to Miller's style, I'd say 2.5 years isn't enough time. IU's defense, by the metrics, has improved each year, including this year, so far. We don't know where it will peak.
His offense remains a concern. The metrics on that suggest that the O has been nearly identical every year, and probably not good enough to achieve IU's stated goals. I need to see something new there. I think we know, for sure, by the end of year 4 whether he can get kids that play how he wants them to play and succeed doing it.
This post is silly. Arkansas got 4 points from IU fouling trying to catch up. Everything else being the same except 6 more made FT, IU would-be been up 68-67 at the point they started sending Arkansas to the line at the end.
Maybe IU would-be been up 17 instead of 11 earlier in the half which could've had more of a psychological effect. Or maybe not. It just would've been a different game if they made the FTs.
You're right that it certainly wouldn't have guaranteed a win. Doesn't really matter because they did miss a bunch of FT, did lose a double digit lead in the 2nd half (again), and did lose.
I know I'm not the poster you responded to, but here's my take: 2.5 years is enough time build your program identity and culture, if the players you inherit are apt to buy in to that identity and culture.
Miller didn't inherit that. His culture and identity is focused on defense. That requires consistent effort, discipline, and the ability to defend without fouling. His seniors are: a headcase hero-baller with no discipline and inconsistent effort, and a foul prone big with no lateral quickness. His juniors are: an athletic swing man with no jumper who finally bought in on D this year, and a lithe combo guard who can't handle the ball well enough to play point, and doesn't defend well. Plus, a transfer big who is limited athletically.
Given their unsuitability to Miller's style, I'd say 2.5 years isn't enough time. IU's defense, by the metrics, has improved each year, including this year, so far. We don't know where it will peak.
His offense remains a concern. The metrics on that suggest that the O has been nearly identical every year, and probably not good enough to achieve IU's stated goals. I need to see something new there. I think we know, for sure, by the end of year 4 whether he can get kids that play how he wants them to play and succeed doing it.
Our kenpom o-rating has been at 109 both years prior, and is again this year. The d-rating has fallen each year...from maybe 98 to 95 to 93 this year.could you please post the metrics you are referring to? My impression is that our offense is much better this year (compared to last), but that our defense is worse? Am I mistaken?
No I'm not. Look at the efficiency score, not the rank.Ya, your making things up. IUs d was 32 last year and 58th this year according to “metrics”. That is almost 100% worse.
Review the efficiency score, not the rank.You flip flopped the metrics if you’re using Kenpom. The offensive metrics have improved , which is impressive considering we still can’t shoot 3s. The defensive metrics have dropped to 58th (32nd last year).
I know I'm not the poster you responded to, but here's my take: 2.5 years is enough time build your program identity and culture, if the players you inherit are apt to buy in to that identity and culture.
Miller didn't inherit that. His culture and identity is focused on defense. That requires consistent effort, discipline, and the ability to defend without fouling. His seniors are: a headcase hero-baller with no discipline and inconsistent effort, and a foul prone big with no lateral quickness. His juniors are: an athletic swing man with no jumper who finally bought in on D this year, and a lithe combo guard who can't handle the ball well enough to play point, and doesn't defend well. Plus, a transfer big who is limited athletically.
Given their unsuitability to Miller's style, I'd say 2.5 years isn't enough time. IU's defense, by the metrics, has improved each year, including this year, so far. We don't know where it will peak.
His offense remains a concern. The metrics on that suggest that the O has been nearly identical every year, and probably not good enough to achieve IU's stated goals. I need to see something new there. I think we know, for sure, by the end of year 4 whether he can get kids that play how he wants them to play and succeed doing it.
No I'm not. Look at the efficiency score, not the rank.
Correct. It's right next to the rank.Effciency score on kenpom? or what site has this?
Correct. It's right next to the rank.
That number is adjusted for strength of schedule, so that argument isn't valid.Gotcha, I am not sure but I think that is because we have only played about 5 games so far (real opponents) If we had PUs schedule I would guess that number would be way worse. I would gladly bet you that that number is worse than it is right now at the end of the season. Hell I will bet you it is worse than last years.
Couldn't agree more. Butler makes much better coach hirings than IU. That's where we are as 2019 comes to a close. Anyone arguing otherwise is simply stuck in 1987.Oh c’‘mon!!!
I’ve got a suggestion for you:
Keep the “shit happens” excuse on speed dial because you will be using that one a LOT this year. Every game will be “shit happens.”
This isn’t some anomaly. This is bad coaching and bad trends in play about every game since Florida State. Only reason we beat ND is because they have no more than like 6 guys that can play. They are s triage ward.
No development. Dumb play. Terrible fundamentals.
Face the facts: the last 2 coaches IU have had were hired on the basis of a couple flukes in the NCAA tournament.
Review the efficiency score, not the rank.
Not having the right players for his system is CAM's fault. No way around that fact.I know I'm not the poster you responded to, but here's my take: 2.5 years is enough time build your program identity and culture, if the players you inherit are apt to buy in to that identity and culture.
Miller didn't inherit that. His culture and identity is focused on defense. That requires consistent effort, discipline, and the ability to defend without fouling. His seniors are: a headcase hero-baller with no discipline and inconsistent effort, and a foul prone big with no lateral quickness. His juniors are: an athletic swing man with no jumper who finally bought in on D this year, and a lithe combo guard who can't handle the ball well enough to play point, and doesn't defend well. Plus, a transfer big who is limited athletically.
Given their unsuitability to Miller's style, I'd say 2.5 years isn't enough time. IU's defense, by the metrics, has improved each year, including this year, so far. We don't know where it will peak.
His offense remains a concern. The metrics on that suggest that the O has been nearly identical every year, and probably not good enough to achieve IU's stated goals. I need to see something new there. I think we know, for sure, by the end of year 4 whether he can get kids that play how he wants them to play and succeed doing it.
Our kenpom o-rating has been at 109 both years prior, and is again this year. The d-rating has fallen each year...from maybe 98 to 95 to 93 this year.
I am going off memory, might be off by a point or two...